Advertisement

Assessing the Potential of Energy Retrofitting and Renewables in the Campus of Lund University

  • Yurui Huang
  • Yuchen Yang
  • Vahid M. NikEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

Several concerns about energy have been discussed during recent decades, such as the shortage of traditional energy resource, increase of energy price and destruction of the living environment. To solve these problems, sustainable development of energy become a preferential task all around the world. Under current circumstances, applying energy saving measures and using renewable energy resource are two of the best choices. The goal of this study is to assess the potential of applying energy saving measures and adding renewable energy resource for the campus of Lund University in Sweden. Energy consumption simulations towards representative buildings were performed for both current and future climatic conditions, meanwhile, investigating the potential of adding solar and wind energy. For energy saving perspective, results show that adding insulation material to old walls, adjusting heating and cooling set points, applying high-efficient heat recovery system, and adding shading devices would have significant effects. Effects of future climatic conditions on heating and cooling energy consumption are considerable. From adding renewable energy resources perspective, results show that the campus of Lund University have enough potential to applying solar and wind energy resources by installing PV systems and small-scale wind turbines. Besides, future climatic condition would not have huge or certain influence on renewable energy applications.

Keywords

Energy retrofitting Renewable energy sources Climate change 

References

  1. 1.
    A. Atzeri, F. Cappelletti, A. Gasparella, Internal versus external shading devices performance in office buildings. Energy Procedia, 463–472(2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Baharwani, N. Meena, A. Sharma, R. Stephen, P. Mohanty, Comparative performance assessment of different solar PV module technologies. Int. J. Innov. Eng. Technol. 5(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Berggren, M. Wall, Thermal bridges in passive houses and nearly zero-energy buildings, in 4th Nordic Passive House Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Compagnon, Solar and daylight availability in the urban fabric, Energy Buildings, 321–328 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Cuce, Role of airtightness in energy loss from windows: experimental results from in-situ tests. Energy Buildings, 449–455(2017, 3 15)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Higgins, A. Foley, The evolution of offshore wind power in the United Kingdom. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 37, 599–612 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Huang, Y. Yang, Assessing the potential of applying energy saving measures and renewable energy resources in the campus of Lund University. Master thesis in Energy-efficient and Environmental Buildings, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Sweden (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IEA. Technology roadmap—wind energy. Paris: IEA (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Jensen, Hygrothermal Analysis of Retrofitted Buildings in the campus of Lund university. Master thesis in Energy-efficient and Environmental Buildings, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Kanters, M. Wall, The impact of urban design decisions on net zero energy solar buildings in Sweden. Urban, Plann. Transp. Res. 2 (1), 312–332 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Karlsson, M. Gustafssona, M. Rönnelidc, L. Tryggd, CO2 emission evaluation of energy conserving measures in buildings connected to a district heating system-case study of a multi-dwelling building gin Sweden. Energy, 341–350 (2016, 9)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kraftringen. Kraftringen. Retrieved 2012, from https://www.kraftringen.se/Privat/solceller/solkartan/ (2012)
  13. 13.
    S. Langer, G. Bekö, E. Bloom, A. Widheden, L. Ekberg, Indoor air quality in passive and conventional new houses in Sweden. Build. Environ. 92–100 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V.M. Nik, Making energy simulation easier for future climate—Synthesizing typical and extreme weather data sets out of regional climate models (RCMs). Appl. Energy, 177, 204–226 (2016, 9 1)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V.M. Nik, E. Mata, A. Sasic Kalagasidis, J.-L. Scartezzini, Effective and robust energy retrofitting measures for future climatic conditions—Reduced heating demand of Swedish households. Energy Buildings, 176–187 (2016, 7 1)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V.M. Nik, Application of typical and extreme weather data sets in the hygrothermal simulation of building components for future climate—A case study for a wooden frame wall. Energy Build. 154, 30–45(2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.T.D. Perera, V.M. Nik, D. Mauree, J.-L. Scartezzini, Electrical hubs: an effective way to integrate non-dispatchable renewable energy sources with minimum impact to the grid. Appl. Energy 190, 232–248 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.T.D. Perera, V.M. Nik, D. Mauree, J.-L. Scartezzini, An integrated approach to design site specific distributed electrical hubs combining optimization, multi-criterion assessment and decision making. Energy 134, 103–120 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Rolland, B. Auzane, The potential of small and medium wind energy in developing countries. Alliance for Rural Electrification position paper 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Stevanović, Optimization of passive solar design strategies: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy, 177–196 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Thorstensson, Small-scale Wind Turbines- Introductory market study for Sweden. Master thesis in International Project Management, Chalmers university of technology, Sweden (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureHuzhou UniversityHuzhouChina
  2. 2.Division of Building Physics, Department of Building and Environmental TechnologyLund UniversityLundSweden
  3. 3.Division of Building Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil EngineeringChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations