Advertisement

Experimental Comparison of Performance Between Single and Dual Core Energy Recovery Ventilation Systems

  • Boualem OuaziaEmail author
  • Ganapathy Gnanamurugan
  • Chantal Arsenault
  • Heather Knudsen
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

In cold climates, the defrost strategies of the dominant conventional single core heat/energy recovery ventilators (HRVs/ERVs) involve the recirculation of exhausted (return) warm air across the heat exchanger core and back into the supply air for the house. In harsh cold climates, this type of defrost strategy can undermine ventilation performance. A dual core ERV design could overcome this issue by providing continuous ventilation. It has a potential to perform better than a conventional single core unit and meet the rigorous requirements for operation in the Canada’s North. This paper provides an experimental comparison of the efficiency between single and dual core ERVs using the twin houses at the Canadian Centre for Housing Technology (CCHT) as a test bed. The side-by-side testing also provided valuable data to measure the impact of the installation of a dual core ERV in a real residential application. Both houses were operated identically and monitored for a range of winter weather conditions. Changes in test house performance due to the innovative dual core design were observed and compared to the performance of the reference house. The parameters that were compared include: efficiency, airflow, indoor temperature and relative humidity, and energy consumption. This paper discusses the effectiveness of the dual core design ERV, energy use of the house and the ventilation rate.

Keywords

Energy recovery ventilator Dual core Residential Cold climate 

References

  1. 1.
    C. Zaloum, Technical advice to task force on Northern mechanical ventilation equipment design and testing (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Nasr, M. Fauchoux, R. Besant, C. Simonson, A review of frosting in air-to-air energy exchangers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30, 538–554 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.G. Phillips, R.E. Chant, D.R. Fisher, V.C. Bradley, Comparison of freezing control strategies for residential air-to-air heat recovery ventilators. ASHRAE Transactions 95(2), 484–490 (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.G. Phillips, D.R. Fisher, R.E. Chant (1992) Freezing-control strategy and air-to-air energy recovery performance. ASHRAE J. 44–49Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ANSI, ASHRAE 62.2, Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, 2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R-2000 Homes Standard (2014) Natural Resources CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.C. Swinton, H. Moussa, R.G. Marchand, Commissioning twin houses for assessing the performance of energy conserving technologies, VIII Integration of Buildings Envelopes (Clearwater, Florida, 2001), pp. 1–10Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.K. Ouazia, M.C. Swinton, M. Julien, M. Manning, Assessment of the enthalpy performance of houses using energy recovery technology. ASHRAE Trans. 112(1), 26–33 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Canadian centre for Housing technology (CCHT). www.ccht-cctr.gc.ca
  10. 10.
    ANSI, ASHRAE Standard 84, Method of testing Air-to-Air Heat/Energy Exchangers (ASHARE, Atlanta, GA, 2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    CAN/CSA-C439, Standard Laboratory Methods of Test for Rating the Performance of Heat/Energy Recovery Ventilators. Canadian Standard Association (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ANSI/AHRI Standard 1060 (1-P), in Performance rating of Air-to-Air Heat/Energy Exchangers for Energy Recovery Ventilation equipment. Air-conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boualem Ouazia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ganapathy Gnanamurugan
    • 1
  • Chantal Arsenault
    • 1
  • Heather Knudsen
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Council CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations