Advertisement

Improving the Indoor Climate and Energy Saving in Renovated Apartment Buildings in Estonia

  • Anti HamburgEmail author
  • Targo Kalamees
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

Energy saving is one of the driving forces in renovation of buildings. Ideally, energy savings should cover the cost of renovation. For purposes of cost efficiency, energy use before and after renovation should be known as accurately as possible. If the energy saving target is too ambitious, energy use after renovation could increase notably and, vice versa, if the target is too low, renovation may not be feasible. In this study we analyze how well the energy saving targets are achieved in renovated apartment buildings in Estonia. The analysis is based on measurements and simulations of indoor climate and energy use in 20 comprehensively renovated apartment buildings. A professional designer and consultant have made an energy audit and design solution before the renovation. Our task was to check the energy audit and compare target and real energy use. We found out that in most cases energy auditors have not assessed existing structures and ventilation correctly, and that basic energy audits should be more detailed in order to assess the existing buildings’ energy consumption. Energy saving targets after renovation were also overoptimistic. Based on our research the Estonian energy renovation grant scheme was upgraded.

Keywords

Energy saving Energy audit Renovation Apartment buildings 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article was supported by the Estonian Centre of Excellence in Zero Energy and Resource Efficient Smart Buildings and Districts, ZEBE, grant TK146, funded by the European Regional Development Fund, and by the Estonian Research Council, with Institutional research funding grant IUT1−15. Authors would also like to Fund Kredex for cooperation and financial support for our research work.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Csoknyai, S. Hrabovszky-Horváth, Z. Georgiev, M. Jovanovic-Popovic, B. Stankovic, O. Villatoro et al., Building stock characteristics and energy performance of residential buildings in Eastern-European countries. Energy Build. 132, 39–52 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    2016/0381 (COD), Amending Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the Energy Performance of Buildings (Brussels, European Commission, 2016). Accessed 30 Nov 2016Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Baek, S. Park, Policy measures to overcome barriers to energy renovation of existing buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 3939–3947 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Kuusk, T. Kalamees, Retrofit cost-effectiveness: Estonian apartment buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 44(8), 920–934 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Kurnitski, A. Saari, T. Kalamees, M. Vuolle, J. Niemelä, T. Tark, Cost optimal and nearly zero energy performance requirements for buildings in Estonia. Est. J. Eng. 19(3), 183–202 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Arumägi, T. Kalamees, Analysis of energy economic renovation for historic wooden apartment buildings in cold climates. Appl. Energy 115, 540–548 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Niemelä, R. Kosonen, J. Jokisalo, Cost-effectiveness of energy performance renovation measures in Finnish brick apartment buildings. Energy Build. 137, 60–75 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Ferreira, M. Almeida, A. Rodrigues, Cost-optimal energy efficiency levels are the first step in achieving cost effective renovation in residential buildings with a nearly-zero energy target. Energy Build. 133, 724–737 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Saari, T. Kalamees, J. Jokisalo, R. Michelsson, K. Alanne, J. Kurnitski, Financial viability of energy-efficiency measures in a new detached house design in Finland. Appl. Energy 92, 76–83 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Bonakdar, A. Dodoo, L. Gustavsson, Cost-optimum analysis of building fabric renovation in a Swedish multi-story residential building. Energy Build. 84, 662–673 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Rose, K. Kuusk, K.E. Thomsen, T. Kalamees, O.C. Mørck, The economic challenges of deep energy renovation: differences, similarities, and possible solutions in Northern Europe—Estonia and Denmark. ASHRAE Transactions 122(1), 58–68 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Branco, B. Lachal, P. Gallinelli, W. Weber, Predicted versus observed heat consumption of a low energy multifamily complex in Switzerland based on long-term experimental data. Energy Build. 36, 543–555 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Calì, T. Osterhage, R. Streblow, D. Müller, Energy performance gap in refurbished German dwellings: lesson learned from a field test. Energy Build. 127, 1146–1158 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Majcen, L. Itard, H. Visscher, Actual heating energy savings in thermally renovated Dutch dwellings. Energy Policy 97, 82–92 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Kalinic, M. Krarti, Evaluation of measurement and verification procedures for retrofit savings using calibrated energy building models, in ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, vol. 2. (ASME, 2010), pp. 363–373Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Toode, T.A. Kõiv, Investigation of the domestic hot water consumption in apartment buildings. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Eng. 11(3), 207–214 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Simson, A. Mikola, T.-A. Koiv, The impact of air pressure conditions on the performance of single room ventilation units in renovated multi-storey apartment buildings. Int. J. Vent. 10(11), 227–236 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations