Upgrading of a Typical Norwegian Existing Wooden House According to the EnerPHit Standard

  • Bozena Dorota HrynyszynEmail author
  • Laurina Cornelia Felius
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)


The building sector has a key role to play in implementing the EU energy efficiency objectives. Around 40% of the energy consumption and a third of CO2 emissions comes from buildings. With the adoption of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings throughout the EU from 2020 onwards, these figures will be reduced in a perceptible and sustainable way [1]. To achieve such a significant reduction before 2030 with the current low new built rate, a comprehensive effort on upgrading existing buildings is necessary. Thus, we should aim for more optimized refurbishment solutions, in addition to building new and more energy efficient buildings. Upgrading existing buildings to higher energy standards is usually far more difficult than obtaining the same standards in new buildings. In many cases, upgrading to the nZEB-level [2] is unlikely to be cost effective. Thus, the Passive House Institute has published the international EnerPHit Standard for retrofit of existing buildings [3]. This article compares the Norwegian energy standards with the international EnerPHit Standard for retrofitting. The article also analyses the upgrade potential of a typical Norwegian wooden house from 1960 to 70 by following the EnerPHit Standard using the “step-by-step” method. Two different programs are used for energy simulation: The Passive House Planning Package and SIMIEN. Furthermore, the article briefly discusses how building automation can be used as a next step to increase energy efficiency. Upgrading of a typical Norwegian wooden house from 1960 to 70 is not free from challenges, but it is possible to achieve the EnerPHit Standard following the “step-by-step” method.


Effective energy use Retrofit Building simulation Building automation 


  1. 1.
    IEA Homepage, in Energy Climate and Change; World Energy Outlook Special Report (2015), Last accessed Jan 2017
  2. 2.
    PHI Homepage, PassREg Final report Passive House Regions with Renewable Energies. (Passive House Institute Dr. Wolfgang Feist, 2015), Last accessed Aug 2017
  3. 3.
    PHI Homepage, Criteria for the Passive House, EnerPHit and PHI Low Energy Building Standard, Last accessed Nov 2016
  4. 4.
    Zeno Bastian: Passive House Institute Introduces New an Updated Building Certification Criteria, Editor, Passive House Institute, Germany 7. Passivhus Norden Copenhagen (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Standard Norge, NS 3700:2013 Kriterier for passivhus og lavenergibygninger-Boligbygninger (Standard Norge, Lysaker, 2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Standard Norge, NS 3701:2012 Kriterier for passivhus og lavenergibygninger-Yrkesbygninger (Standard Norge, Lysaker, 2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Standard Norge, NS-EN 15232:2012 Bygningens energiyttelse- Innvirkning ved bruk av bygningsautomation og bygningsadministrasjon (Standard Norge, Lysaker, 2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    PHI Homepage, Step by Step Retrofits with Passive House Components. In: Editor, Zeno Bastian (2016), Last accessed Jan 2017
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Knut Ivar Edvardsen, Trond Ramstad, Håndbok 53 Trehus. SINTEF Byggforsk, 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nasjonalmuseet, Den Norske Stats Husbank Type 131, Last accessed 12 July 2017
  12. 12.
    Passive House Institute, Passive House Planning Package (PHPP, Version 9)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Programbyggerne ANS, SIMIEN (Version 6.005), Last accessed 28 Aug 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bozena Dorota Hrynyszyn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laurina Cornelia Felius
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations