Advertisement

Vertical Examination of Residential Patterns in Whitechapel

  • Shlomit Flint Ashery
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

The bottom-up micro-resolution research of Whitechapel recognises real dynamic processes operating as a generator to vertical micro-integration. This study has found that despite Whitechapel’s appearance as a patchwork of a cultural mosaic, economic activity and class relations, there is also a strong but latent vertical inner order. This vertical differentiation mechanism is based on identity and groups’ affiliation and is recognised, adjusted to and obeyed by residents of all groups. This research provides two new concepts to the database of design integration of absorption neighbourhoods. The first is the micro-resolution of the procedure of creation of the vertical pattern at the individual building level, and the second is ‘vertical micro integration’; an idea describing bottom-up initiation of minorities groups to create ‘semi-private’–‘semi-public’ community space, by which they can integrate with other groups in a compact urban area.

Keywords

Vertical pattern Vertical differentiation Economic segregation Informality Residential choices 

References

  1. Adey P (2013) Secure the volume/volumen. Polit Geogr 34:52–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allum PA (1973) Politics and society in post-war Naples. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Benenson I, Omer I, Hatna E (2002) Entity-based modeling of urban residential dynamics—the case of Yaffo. Tel-Aviv Environ Plann B 29:491–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blunt A (2008) The ‘skyscraper settlement’: home and residence at Christodora House. Environ Plann A 40:550–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruch EE, Mare RD (2006) Neighborhood choice and neighborhood change. Am J Sociol 112(3):667–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brumann C (2012) Re-uniting a divided city. In: Brumann C, Schulz E (eds) Urban spaces in Japan: cultural and social perspectives. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coing H (1966) Rénovation urbaine et changement social. Les Éditions Ouvrières, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Corder GW, Foreman DI (2009) Comparing variables of ordinal or dichotomous scales: spearman rank‐order, point‐biserial, and biserial correlations. Nonparametric Stat Non-Stat Step-by-Step Approach 122–154Google Scholar
  9. Cottineau C, Hatna E, Arcaute E, Batty M (2016) Diverse cities or the systematic paradox of urban scaling laws. Comput Environ Urban Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deutsche R (1991) Boys town. Environ Plann D: Soc Space 9:5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elden S (2013) Secure the volume: vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Polit Geogr 34:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flache A, Hegselmann R (2001) Do irregular grids make a difference? Relaxing the spatial regularity assumption in cellular models of social dynamics. J Artif Societies Soc Simul 4(4)Google Scholar
  13. Fossett MA (2006) Ethnic preferences, social distance dynamics, and residential segregation: theoretical explorations using simulation analysis. Math Sociol 30(3–4):185–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glass R (1989) Cliches of urban doom. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham S (2010) Laboratories of war: surveillance and US-Israeli collaboration in war and security. In: Zureik E, Lyon D, Abu-Laban Y (eds) Surveillance and control in Israel/Palestine: population, territory and power. Routledge, New York, pp 133–152Google Scholar
  16. Graham S (2011) The new military urbanism. In: Bridge G, Watson S (eds) The New Blackwell companion to the city. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 121–133Google Scholar
  17. Graham S (2015) Luxified skies: how vertical urban housing became an elite preserve. City 19(5):618–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham S (2016) When life itself is war: the urbanization of military and security doctrine. In: Simpson D, Jensen V, Rubing A (ed) The city between freedom and security: contested public spaces in the 21st Century. Birkhäuser VerlagGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham S, Hewitt L (2012) Getting off the ground: on the politics of urban verticality. Prog Hum Geogr 37:72–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haraway D (1988) The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud 14:575–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris A (2015) Vertical urbanisms: opening up geographies of the three-dimensional city. Prog Hum Geogr 39(5):601–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Iceland J (2004) Beyond black and white: metropolitan residential segregation in multi-ethnic America. Soc Sci Res 33(2):248–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ireson A (ed) (2000: 701) City levels. Birkhauser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaffe E (2011) The world’s next 20 tallest skyscrapers. The Atlantic cities. Available at http://www.theatlanticcities.com/design/2011/12/worlds-20-tallest-skyscrapers/775/
  25. Lamster M (2011) Castles in the air. Sci Am 305:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laquerbe J (1967) La population des quartiers historiques à Montpellier. Economie Meridionale 60(4):1–7Google Scholar
  27. Leontidou L (1990) The Mediterranean city in transition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lichtenberger E (1970) 53–8) The nature of European urbanism. Geoforum 4:45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maloutas T (2007) Segregation, social polarization and immigration in Athens during the 1990s: theoretical expectations and contextual difference. Int J Urban Reg Res 31(4):733–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maloutas T, Karadimitriou N (2001) Vertical social differentiation in Athens: alternative or complement to community segregation? Int J Urban Reg Res 25(4):699–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maloutas T, Arapoglou VP, Kandylis G, Sayas J (2012) Social polarization and de-segregation in Athens. In: Maloutas T, Fujita K (eds) Residential segregation in comparative perspective. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 257–283Google Scholar
  32. McNeill D (2005) Skyscraper geography. Prog Hum Geogr 29(1):41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nissel H (2010) Global capital, neoliberal politics and terrains of resistance in Vienna. In: Banerjee-Guha S (ed) Accumulation by dispossession: transformative cities in the new global order. Sage, New Delhi, pp 55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pacione M (2001) Urban geography: a global perspective. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roche D (1987) The people of Paris: an essay in popular culture in the 18th century. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Saitluanga BL (2017) Vertical differentiation in urban space: a case of Aizawl city. Singap J Trop Geogr 38(2017):216–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith N, Williams P (1986) Gentrification of the city. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Von Collani E, Dräger K (2001) Binomial distribution handbook for scientists and engineers. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  39. Weizman E (2011) The least of all possible evils: humanitarian violence from Arendt to Gaza. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Wessendorf S (2014) Commonplace diversity: social relations in a super-diverse context. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  41. White P (1984) The West-European city. A social geography. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiles W (2014) The chaos and tangled energy of living cities. Aeon magazine. Available at http://aeon.co/magazine/living-together/the-chaos-and-tangled-energy-ofliving-cities/. Accessed 20 July 2014
  43. Yuen B (2011) Liveability of tall residential buildings. In: Yuen B, Yeh AGO (eds) High-rise living in Asian cities. Springer, New York, pp 129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and EnvironmentBar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  2. 2.Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA)University College London (UCL)LondonUK

Personalised recommendations