Advertisement

Technology Transfer Professional

  • Valentina Colcelli
Chapter

Abstract

For the purposes of the chapter, Technology Transfer Professionals are defined as intermediaries between technology suppliers and users who deal with ready-to-use technologies or technologies which have already been patented. Over the past 35 years, the commercialisation of academic research has become an increasingly prominent aspect of university activity. The participation of universities in technology transfer (TT) endeavours, mainly through the patenting and licensing of research results, serves as an important trigger for a re-evaluation of the nature of the profession of academic scientists in light of the knowledge-based society grounded in the Lisbon Strategy.

References

  1. Adunmo, K. A. (2011). The European Research Area (ERA): Science, knowledge, research & innovation. Towards Europe 2020. Diritto e processo, 9–38.Google Scholar
  2. Amalya, L. O., & Adi, S. (2017). Shifts in the organization and profession of academic science: The impact of IPR and technology transfer. Journal of Professions and Organization, 4(1), 36–54.Google Scholar
  3. Benassi, M., D’Angelo, A., & Guido Geenen, G. (2012). IP intermediaries in Europe: A web content analysis. Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, 19(4), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2013). Academic faculty in university research centers: Neither capitalism’s slaves nor teaching fugitives. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(1), 88–120.Google Scholar
  5. Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science–industry collaborations: Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy, 32(6), 887–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cippitani, R., & Gatt, S. (2009). Legal developments and problems of the Bologna Process within the European higher education area and European integration. Higher Education in Europe, 385–397.Google Scholar
  7. Conti, G., Granieri, M., & Piccaluga, A. (2011). La Gestione del Trasferimento Tecnologico. Strategie, Modelli e Strumenti. Milano: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davey, T., Baaken, T., Galán-Muros, V., & Meerman, A. (2011). Study on the cooperation between higher education institutions and public and private organisations in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, DG Education and Culture.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2007). The European research area: New perspective (Green Paper 4 April 2007).Google Scholar
  10. European Knowledge Transfer Report. (2013). [pdf Document]. Retrieved from https://vdocuments.site/documents/european-knowledge-transfer-report-2013.html
  11. Keeling, R. (2006). The Bologna Process and the Lisbon Research Agenda: The European Commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse. European Journal of Education.Google Scholar
  12. Minniti, A., & Venturini, F. (2017). The long-run growth effects of R&D policy. Research Policy, 46(1), 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Polanyi, M. (1990). La conoscenza personale. Verso una filosofia post-critica. Milano: Rusconi.Google Scholar
  14. Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu, G. (2003). Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research CouncilIFAC InstituteSesto Fiorentino, FirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations