Advertisement

Ethics Advisor on Research Projects

  • Roberto CippitaniEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

According to EU law, freedom of research is considered as a fundamental right (see Article 13 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union).

However, to achieve the objective of building the European Research Area (‘ERA’) it is necessary to face the risks arising from scientific research and innovation.

In order to reinforce the protection of fundamental rights within the ERA, Europe has to develop a system of shared values.

In particular, EU is identifying and elaborating ‘ethical fundamental principles’, that is to say, legal provisions as well as other kinds of rules (e.g. those established by case law, codes of practice, and opinions of ethics committees), whose scope is the protection of fundamental interests that may be affected by techno-science.

The EU takes into consideration the need to respect ethical rules, especially within the funding of the Framework Programmes, such as the present Horizon 2020.

According to the documents of the European Commission, the consortium of beneficiaries of a research programme should be supported by experts to ensure that it complies appropriately with ethical requirements.

In particular, the consortium is requested to appoint one or more ‘ethics advisors’.

The role of an ethics advisor is to provide the partnership as a whole, its bodies (steering committees, general assembly, etc.) and each beneficiary, with advice on specific issues or general opinions about the ethical aspects of the research activities, including the regulations adopted by the body of the consortium.

References

  1. Andorno, R. (2013). Principles of international bio law: Seeking common ground at the intersection of bioethics and human rights. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Busnelli, F. D. (2010). Towards a ‘European Bioethics’? Ethically Speaking, 14, 11.Google Scholar
  4. Cippitani, R. (2012). El Derecho de la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Rome-Perugia: ISEG.Google Scholar
  5. Cippitani, R. (2015). Academic freedom as a fundamental right. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Higher Education Advances, HEAd’15, Universitat Politècnica de València.Google Scholar
  6. Hunter, D. (2007). Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mathieu, B. (2009). La bioéthique. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
  8. Molina del Pozo, C. F. (2009). El Derecho comunitario y la I+D+T. Hacia el diseño de un perfil para el futuro. Madrid: UAH.Google Scholar
  9. Monnier, S. (2009). Les comités d’éthique et le droit: Eléments d’analyse sur le système normatif de la bioéthique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversità degli Studi di PerugiaPerugiaItalia

Personalised recommendations