Advertisement

Structural Diplomacy: Development, Participation and Governance

  • Yolanda Kemp Spies
Chapter

Abstract

This final substantive chapter of the book deals with a hybrid approach rather than a distinct diplomatic mode. Structural diplomacy is geared—in purpose as well as methodology—towards the terms of interaction in the international system. It confronts the discrepancies between notions of global ‘democracy’ and the actual, entrenched hierarchies of power. The chapter focuses therefore on the perennial power-diplomacy nexus. Spies recounts how, in recent decades, the Global South has assumed agency in addressing systemic flaws in world order. She explains the role of middle powers in providing norm entrepreneurship (inter alia as concerns equity in the forums of global governance) and the intriguing diplomacy of emerging powers who are using the ‘rules of the game’ to challenge the architecture of global power.

Sources Used

  1. Acharya, A. (2008, September 17–20). Regional Worlds in a Post-Hegemonic Era. Keynote Speech, 3rd GARNET Annual Conference, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
  2. African Union (AU). (2005, March 7–8). The Common African Position on the Proposed Reform of the United Nations: “The Ezulwini Consensus”. Executive Council of the African Union, 7th Extraordinary Session, Addis Ababa. Ext/Ex.Cl/2 (VII).Google Scholar
  3. Annan, K. (2000, April 3). We the Peoples. Secretary-General’s Statement to the United Nations General Assembly on the Occasion of His Delivery of the Millennium Report. New York, NY. Internet Web-Site. Accessed on 25 September 2000. http://www.un.org/millennium/sg/report/state.htm.
  4. Annan, K. (2005, March 21). In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All. Report of the Secretary-General Prepared for the General Assembly’s Millennium + 5 Summit. New York.Google Scholar
  5. Associated Press (AP), Beijing. (2017, July 11). China Sends Forces to 1st Military Base Abroad, in Djibouti. ABC News. Available at http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/china-dispatches-military-personnel-djibouti-base-48564707.
  6. Australia, Commonwealth of Minister of Foreign Affairs. (2014, June 18). The New Aid Paradigm. Media Release. Available at http://foreignminister.gov.au/releases/Pages/2014/jb_mr_140618.aspx.
  7. Ban Ki-Moon. (2008, November 29). Secretary-General Calls for Genuine, ‘Elastic Multilateralism’ to Tackle Global Challenges Simultaneously. UN Press Release at the International Conference on Financing for Development, Doha.Google Scholar
  8. Barston, R. P. (2006). Modern Diplomacy (3rd ed.). London: Pearson and Longman.Google Scholar
  9. BBC. (2015, January 13). The Man Who Opened India’s First Call Centre. BBC News, Magazine: ‘Witness’. http://www.bbc.com/news/av/magazine-30729450/the-man-who-opened-india-s-first-call-centre.
  10. Bellamy, A. J. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect and Australian Foreign Policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 64(4), 432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boutros-Ghali, B. (1994, May 6). An Agenda for Development. Report by the Secretary-General of the United Nations. A/48/935.Google Scholar
  12. Bradlow, D. (2012, March 9). We Must Lead in Putting Africa First. Mail and Guardian. Available at http://mg.co.za/article/2012-03-09-we-must-lead-in-putting-africa-first.
  13. BRICS. (2011, April 14). Sanya Declaration. BRICS Leaders Meeting, Sanya, Hainan, China. Available at https://www.saiia.org.za/images/stories/research/chap/sanya_declaration_brics_april_2011.pdf.
  14. Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Calvert, S., & Calvert, P. (1996). Politics and Society in the Third World: An Introduction. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Chapnick, A. (2000). The Canadian Middle Power Myth. International Journal, 55(2) (Spring), 188–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Committee for the Abolition of the Third World Debt (CADTM). (2016). Internet Home Page of the CADTM. http://cadtm.org/Heavily-Indebted-Poor-Countries.
  19. Cooper, A. F. (2009). Middle Powers: Squeezed Out or Adaptive? Public Diplomacy Magazine, 2 (Summer), 29–34.Google Scholar
  20. Cooper, A. F., Higgott, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (Eds.). (1993). Relocating Middle Powers. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, A. F., Hocking, B., & Maley, W. (2008). Introduction: Diplomacy and Global Governance: Locating Patterns of (Dis)Connection. In A. F. Cooper, B. Hocking, & W. Maley (Eds.), Global Governance and Diplomacy: Worlds Apart? London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Copeland, D. (2013, August). Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation. Policy Paper, Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Cox, R. (1989). Middlepowermanship, Japan and Future World Order. International Journal, 44(4), 823–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Mello, E. B. (2014, January–June). New Independent Foreign Policy, a Matter of Emphasis. Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations, 3(5), 245–269.Google Scholar
  25. Ditchley Foundation. (2010, March 4–6). A Note by the Director, Following a Conference on The Functions and Purposes of Modern Diplomacy, Ditchley. http://www.ditchley.co.uk/conferences/past-programme/2010-2019/2010/modern-diplomacy. Accessed on 29 January 2013.
  26. European Commission. (2017). ACP—The Cotonou Agreement. Internet Website of the European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/regions/african-caribbean-and-pacific-acp-region/cotonou-agreement_en. Accessed on 30 June 2017.
  27. Evans, G. (2011, June 29). Middle Power Diplomacy. Inaugural Edgardo Boeninger Memorial Lecture by Gareth Evans at the Chile Pacific Foundation, Santiago. Internet: http://www.gevans.org/speeches/speech441.html. Accessed on 11 August 2014.
  28. Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, 16(Summer), 3–18.Google Scholar
  29. G8. (2000, July 21–23). Communiqué Following the 26th Summit by the Leaders of the G8. Okinawa. http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/summit/2000/documents/index.html. Accessed on 7 July 2017.
  30. G8. (2002, July 27). Africa Action Plan. Summit of the Heads of State and Government of the G8. Kananaskis. www.g7.utoronto.ca/summit/2002kananaskis/africaplan.html.
  31. G20. (2008, November 15). Declaration of the Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy. Washington, DC. http://www.un.org/ga/president/63/commission/declarationG20.pdf. Accessed on 6 July 2017.
  32. G20. (2009, September 24–25). Leaders’ Statement. G20 Pittsburgh Summit. Accessed via Internet on 9 June 2010, at http://www.g20.org/Documents/pittsburgh_summit_leaders_statement_250909.pdf.
  33. G20. (2010, November 12). Seoul Development Consensus for Shared Growth. G20 Leaders’ Summit in Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
  34. Geldenhuys, D. (2006). South Africa’s Role as International Norm Entrepreneur. In W. Carlsnaes & P. Nel (Eds.), In Full Flight: South African Foreign Policy After Apartheid. Midrand: Institute for Global Dialogue.Google Scholar
  35. Gilboa, E. (2009). The Public Diplomacy of Middle Powers. Public Diplomacy Magazine, 2(Summer), 22–28.Google Scholar
  36. Haass, R. N. (2008, May/June). The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow US Dominance? Foreign Affairs, 87(3), 44–56.Google Scholar
  37. Habib, A., & Selinyane, N. (2006). Constraining the Unconstrained: Civil Society and South Africa’s Hegemonic Obligations in Africa. In W. Carlsnaes & P. Nel (Eds.), In Full Flight: South African Foreign Policy After Apartheid (pp. 175–181). Midrand: Institute for Global Dialogue.Google Scholar
  38. Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2006, July). The UN and Regional Organisations in Global Security: Competing or Complementary Logics? Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 12(3), 227–232.Google Scholar
  39. Hocking, B. Melissen, J. Riordan, S., & Sharp, P. (2013, April). Whither Foreign Ministries in a Post-Western World? Clingendael Policy Brief No. 20, Clingendael Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Holbraad, C. (1984). Middle Powers in International Politics. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huntington, S. P. (1999, March/April). The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs, 78(2), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Inoue, C. Y. A., & Vaz, A. C. (2012). Brazil as ‘Southern Donor’: Beyond Hierarchy and National Interests in Development Cooperation? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(4), 507–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jordaan, E. (2003, November). The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing Between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers. Politikon, 30(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luck, E. C. (2006). UN Security Council: Practice and Promise. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Mahathir, M. (1999, October 26). Speech by the Prime Minister of Malaysia to the Africa-Asia Business Forum. Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  46. Mahbubani, K. (2013). Multilateral Diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Malone, D. M. (2013). The Modern Diplomatic Mission. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mudida, R. (2012). Emerging Trends and Concerns in the Economic Diplomacy of African States. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy, 1(1), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. New Zealand, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2011). United Nations Handbook 2011/2012. Wellington: MOFAT.Google Scholar
  50. New Zealand, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2014). Official Website. http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Foreign-Relations/1-Global-Issues/Disarmament/0--Nuclear/0-new-agenda-coalition.php. Accessed on 7 August 2014.
  51. Nganje, F. (2013, May). Decentralised South-South Cooperation and South Africa’s Post-conflict Support in Africa: What Role for SADPA? Africa Institute of South Africa Policy Brief No. 87.Google Scholar
  52. Nolte, D. (2007, May 7–12). How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics. GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg. Paper Prepared for Delivery at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  53. Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). (2006, September 11–16). Plan of Action: 2006–2009. Policy Adopted by the XIV Summit of Heads of State or Government of the NAM. Havana.Google Scholar
  54. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Information Note: History of the 0.7% ODA Target. (Original Text from DAC Journal 2002, 3(4), III-9–III-11; Revised March 2016.) Internet Website of the OECD. https://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/ODA-history-of-the-0-7-target.pdf. Accessed on 19 July 2017.
  55. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017a). The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness: Five Principles for Smart Aid. OECD Internet Website. Available at http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiveness/45827300.pdf.
  56. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017b). Global Relations, Key Partners. Website of the OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org/globalrelations/keypartners/. Accessed on 25 July 2017.
  57. Qobo, M. (2011, September). Emerging Powers and the Changing Global Environment: Leadership, Norms and Institutions. SAIIA Occasional Paper. No. 91.Google Scholar
  58. Shaw, T. M, Cooper, A. F., & Chin, G. T. (2009, April). Emerging Powers and Africa: Implications for/from Global Governance? Politikon, 36(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, G. S. (2011, May). G7 to G8 to G20: Evolution in Global Governance. CIGI G20 Papers No. 6.Google Scholar
  60. Spies, Y. K. (2008, May). The Multilateral Maze and (South) Africa’s Quest for Permanent United Nations Security Council Representation. Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 1, 96–122.Google Scholar
  61. Spies, Y. K. (2010). South Africa’s Multilateral Challenges in a ‘Polypolar’ World. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 45(4), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stimson Centre. (2011, February). Forging a 21st-Century Diplomatic Service for the United States Through Professional Education and Training. Report for the Henry L. Stimson Center, American Foreign Service Association, and American Academy of Diplomacy.Google Scholar
  63. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2017). SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. Website of SIPRE. Avaliable at https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex. Accessed on 25 July 2017.
  64. Stuenkel, O. (2016). The BRICS: Seeking Privileges by Constructing and Running Multilateral Institutions. Global Summitry, 2(1), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. The Hindu. (2013, November 25). Indian Diplomacy Has Delivered in Spite of Frugal Means: NSA. Available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/indian-diplomacy-ha.
  66. Transparency International. (2016). Website of Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016. Accessed on 1 November 2017.
  67. Ungerer, C. (2007). The ‘Middle Power’ Concept in Australian Foreign Policy. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 53(4), 538–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. United Nations (UN). (2004, December). A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. Report of the Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, A/59/565.Google Scholar
  69. United Nations (UN). (2017, September 12). United Nations Day for South-South Cooperation: Background. Official Website of the UN. Available at http://www.un.org/en/events/southcooperationday/background.shtml.
  70. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (1992, December 11). Question of Equitable Representation on and Increase in the Membership of the Security Council. Resolution. 47/62.Google Scholar
  71. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2000, September 8). United Nations Millennium Declaration. Resolution 55/2, Adopted by the United Nations Millennium Summit of Heads of State or Government. New York.Google Scholar
  72. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2009, December 1–3). Report of the High-Level United Nations Conference on South-South Cooperation. Nairobi. A/CONF.215/2.Google Scholar
  73. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2015a, July 13–16, 27). Addis Ababa Action Agenda. Outcome Document of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Endorsed by the General Assembly in Its Resolution 69/313.Google Scholar
  74. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2015b, September 25). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar
  75. United Nations News Service. (2008, November 29). In Doha, Ban Urges ‘Bold’ Steps to Prevent Financial Turmoil Becoming Human Crisis. Published On-Line on by the UN News Centre. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=29125#. Accessed on 25 July 2017.
  76. Varghese, P. (2013, November 7). The Challenges of Multilateralism. Sir James Plimsoll Lecture, Delivered by the Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia. https://www.dfat.gov.au/media/speeches/department/131107-plimsoll.html#site-header.
  77. Vella, G. F. (1998, February). Opening Address by Dr. G. F. Vella, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Environment of Malta, to the International Conference on Modern Diplomacy, Malta. In J. Kurbalija (Ed.), Modern Diplomacy. Malta: Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, University of Malta.Google Scholar
  78. Vickers, B. (2012 b). Towards a New Aid Paradigm: South Africa as African Development Partner. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(4), 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vom Hau, M., Scott, J., & Hulme, D. (2012). Beyond the BRICs: Alternative Strategies of Influence in the Global Politics of Development. European Journal of Development Research, 24, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2014). Rethinking Global Governance? Complexity, Authority, Power, Change. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. What’s In Blue. (2013, October 18). Security Council Elections: Options After Saudi Arabia Rejects Its Seat. http://www.whatsinblue.org/2013/10/security-council-elections-options-after-saudi-arabia-rejects-its-seat.php. Accessed on 21 October 2013.
  82. Wilson, D., & Purushothaman, R. (2003, October 1). Dreaming with BRICS: The Path to 2050. Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper (99).Google Scholar
  83. Wilson, D., & Stupnytska, A. (2007). The N-11: More Than an Acronym. In J. O’Neill (Ed.), BRICS and Beyond (Chapter 11). Goldman Sachs Global Economics Research Paper Collection.Google Scholar
  84. Woods, N. (2010, January). Global Governance After the Financial Crisis: A New Multilateralism or the Last Gasp of the Great Powers? Global Policy, 1(1), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Woolcock, S., & Bayne, N. (2013). Economic Diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yolanda Kemp Spies
    • 1
  1. 1.University of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations