Integrating Mental Health into a Primary Care System: A Hybrid Simulation Model

  • Roberto AringhieriEmail author
  • Davide Duma
  • Francesco Polacchi
Part of the AIRO Springer Series book series (AIROSS, volume 1)


Depression and anxiety appear to be the most frequently encountered psychiatric problems in primary care patients. It has been also reported that primary care physicians under-diagnose psychiatric illness in their patients. Although collaborative care has been shown to be a cost-effective strategy for treating mental disorders, to the best of our knowledge few attempts of modelling collaborative care interventions in primary care are known in literature. The main purpose of this paper is to propose a hybrid simulation approach to model the integration of the collaborative care for mental health into the primary care pathway in order to allow an accurate cost-effectiveness analysis. Quantitative analysis are reported exploiting different and independent input data sources in order to overcome the problem of the data appropriateness. The analysis demonstrates the capability of the collaborative care to reduce the usual general practitioner overcrowding and to be cost-effective when the psychological treatments have a success rate around the \(50\%\).


Mental health Collaborative care pathway Cost effectiveness Discrete event Agent based Hybrid simulation 


  1. 1.
    Afzali, H., Karnon, J., Gray, J.: A critical review of model-based economic studies of depression: modelling techniques, model structure and data sources. PharmacoEconomics 30(6), 461–482 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Afzali, H.H.A., Karnon, J., Merlin, T.: Improving the accuracy and comparability of model-based economic evaluations of health technologies for reimbursement decisions: a methodological framework for the development of reference models. Med. Decis. Mak. 33(3), 325–332 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aringhieri, R., Duma, D., Fragnelli, V.: Modeling the rational behavior of individuals on an e-commerce system. Oper. Res. Perspect. 5, 22–31 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aringhieri, R., Tànfani, E., Testi, A.: Operations research for health care delivery. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(9), 2165–2166 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borshchev, A.: The Big Book of Simulation Modeling. Multimethod Modeling with AnyLogic, vol. 6 (2013). ISBN 978-0-9895731-7-7Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., Audin, K.: Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the core-om. Br. J. Psychiatry 180, 51–60 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferrari, S., Galeazzi, G., Mackinnon, A., Rigatelli, M.: Frequent attenders in primary care: impact of medical, psychiatric and psychosomatic diagnoses. Psychother. Psychosom. 77(5), 306–314 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gili, M., Luciano, J., Serrano, M., Jimnez, R., Bauza, N., Roca, M.: Mental disorders among frequent attenders in primary care: a comparison with routine attenders. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 199(10), 744–749 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glied, S., Herzog, K., Frank, R.: Review: the net benefits of depression management in primary care. Med. Care Res. Rev. 67(3), 251–274 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Layard, R., Bell, S., Clark, D., Knapp, M., Meacher, M., Priebe, S., et al.: The depression report: a new deal for depression and anxiety disorders. LSE London (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marino, M., Gnavi, R., Rusciani, R., Spadea, T., Migliardi, A., Costa, G.: Caratteristiche dell’utenza del MMG in Italia e determinanti dell’accesso. I dati dell’indagine Multiscopo “Salute 2005”. In: Prima Conferenza Italiana sulle Cure Domiciliari, Roma, maggio 2011Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nuijten, M.: The selection of data sources for use in modelling studies. PharmacoEconomics 13(3), 305–316 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Üstün, T., Sartorius, N. (eds.): Mental Illness in General Health Care: An International Study. Wiley (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watkins, K., Cuellar, A., Hepner, K., Hunter, S., Paddock, S., Ewing, B., de la Cruz, E.: The cost-effectiveness of depression treatment for co-occurring disorders: a clinical trial. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 46(2), 128–133 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Aringhieri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Davide Duma
    • 1
  • Francesco Polacchi
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità degli Studi di TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.Università degli Studi di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations