Advertisement

Surveillance, Sousveillance, and the Uncanny Domestic Architecture of Black Mirror

  • Luke ReidEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Addressing the extent to which contemporary screen culture and social media have become increasingly enmeshed with corporate and state-run surveillance technologies, I consider the ways in which Charlie Brooker’s dystopian anthology series Black Mirror posits data-mining and “sousveillance” as processes of uncanny domestic architecture. By way of these technologies, the subject is depicted as “dwelling” within virtual realities constructed by streams of information culled from social media platforms and “smart” devices. That the materials for these architectures have been willingly generated by the subject suggests the internalisation of the panoptical eye, as well as an architecture of control existing neither inside nor outside traditional architecture but, more sinisterly, in topological and symbiotic collusion with it. Black Mirror suggests that our virtual selves have lives of their own, existences realised through self-surveillance, identities “housed” within forms of architecture that uncannily unsettle conventional notions of self, place, and home.

Bibliography

  1. Albrechtslund, A., & Ryberg, T. (2011). Participatory Surveillance in the Intelligent Building. Design 27(3), 35–46. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41261942. Accessed 1 Jan 2018.
  2. Augé, M. (2008). Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity (2nd ed.). Translated from French by J. Howe. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  3. Brolin, B. C. (1976). The Failure of Modern Architecture. London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar
  4. Burgin, V. (2002). Jenni’s Room: Exhibitionism and Solitude. In T. Y. Levin, U. Frohne, & P. Weibel (Eds.), CTRL [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother (pp. 228–235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. CNNMoney. (2017). Black Mirror Creator: We Replaced the Supernatural with Tech. [Online Video] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggwCdrX-QYU. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.
  6. Coleman, N. (2014). The Problematic of Architecture and Utopia. Utopian Studies, 25(1), 1–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/utopianstudies.25.1.0001. Accessed 15 Apr 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colomina, B. (1992). The Split Wall: Domestic Voyeurism. In B. Colomina (Ed.), Sexuality and Space (pp. 72–128). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  8. Colomina, B. (1994). Privacy and Publicity: Modern Architecture as Mass Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Corbusier. (1986). Towards a New Architecture. Translated from the French by F. Etchells. New York: Dover Publications, PDF (Online). Available at: https://monoskop.org/images/b/bf/Corbusier_Le_Towards_a_New_Architecture_no_OCR.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2018.
  10. “Crocodile”. (2017). Black Mirror, Streaming Video, Netflix. Available at: https://www.netflix.com
  11. de Certeau, M. (1988). The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated from the French by S. Rendall. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Delahaye, J. (2018, January 8). Black Mirror ‘Crocodile’ Location Revealed as Viewers Floored by the Breathtaking Snowy Landscapes. Mirror [Online]. Available at: https://www.mirror.co.uk/travel/europe/black-mirror-crocodile-filming-location-11791798. Accessed 3 Mar 2018.
  13. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/778828. Accessed 18 Mar 2018.
  14. Dernbach, R. (2018). The Uncanny of Surveillance: Architectures of Hyperactive Incapacity in Nikolaus Geyrhalter’s Abendland and Falk Richter’s Unter Eis. In A. Ring, H. Steiner, & K. Veel (Eds.), Architecture and Control (pp. 46–64). Boston: Brill. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com. Accessed 17 Mar 2018.
  15. “Fifteen Million Merits”. (2011). Black Mirror, Streaming Video, Netflix. Available at: https://www.netflix.com
  16. McQuire, S. (2008). The Media City: Media, Architecture and Urban Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Rice, C. (2007). The Emergence of the Interior: Architecture, Modernity, Domesticity. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Rowe, C., & Koetter, F. (1978). Collage City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Steiner, H., & Veel, K. (2011). Living Behind Glass Facades: Surveillance Culture and New Architecture. Surveillance & Society, 9(1/2), 215–232. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org. Accessed 18 Mar 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. “The Entire History of You”. (2011). Black Mirror, Streaming Video, Netflix. Available at: https://www.netflix.com
  21. Thorne, S. (2012). The Cleaving of House and Home: A Lacanian Analysis of Architectural Aesthetics. Master’s Thesis, The University of Western Ontario. Available at: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1014. Accessed 27 Jan 2018.
  22. Trigg, D. (2012). The Memory of Place: A Phenomenology of the Uncanny. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Urban, F. (2012). Tower and Slab: Histories of Global Mass Housing. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Vidler, A. (1992). The Architectural Uncanny: Essays in the Modern Unhomely. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Widrich, M. (2015). ‘I’ll Be Your Mirror’: Transparency, Voyeurism and Glass Architecture. In: H. Steiner & K. Veel (Eds.), Invisibility Studies: Surveillance, Transparency and the Hidden in Contemporary Culture (pp. 43–59). Bern: Peter Lang AG, International Academic Publishers. Available at: http://web.b.ebscohost.com. Accessed 18 Mar 2018.
  26. Zizek, S. (2002). Big Brother, or, the Triumph of the Gaze over the Eye. In T. Y. Levin, U. Frohne, & P. Weibel (Eds.), CTRL [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother (pp. 224–227). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations