Epilogue: Control(ling) Space
The concluding chapter exposes the problematic nature of surveillance culture shored up in architectural frames and through the built environment. Drawing on the environment narratives of surveillance to a point of conclusion, where the blurring of public and private, interior and exterior can be elucidated, the conclusion progresses the collection’s focus from the examples contained here, to a more global and overarching analysis, drawing on the issues at the heart of this study—the impact of being viewed—on human categories.
- Herzog, T. (2010). The Banality of Surveillance: Michael Haneke’s Caché and Life After the End of Privacy. Modern Austrian Literature, 43, 25.Google Scholar
- Monahan, T. (2010). Surveillance in the Time of Insecurity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Opine. (2018, March). Surveillance in Cities: Peter Marx and Allan Alexander Opine. Planning Report. https://www.planningreport.com/2018/03/26/surveillance-cities-peter-marx-allan-alexander-opine. Accessed 28 July 2018.
- Pasternack, A. (2016, November 29). Laura Poitras Films The Architecture of Surveillance – And Projects Films on It Too. https://www.fastcompany.com/3066080/laura-poitras-and-the-architecture-of-surveillance. Accessed 28 July 2018.
- Tate Modern. https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/exhibition/exposed/exposed-voyeurism-surveillance-and-camera-exhibition-guide. Accessed 28 July 2018.
- Zelen, R. (2018, April 13). How Surveillance Cities Are Evolving. https://www.planetizen.com/news/2018/04/98197-how-surveillance-cities-evolving. Accessed 28 July 2018.