Advertisement

Suárez on the Metaphysics of Habits

  • Dominik PerlerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action book series (HSNA, volume 7)

Abstract

Suárez pursues a realist strategy when explaining habits: they are real qualities of the soul, acting as real causes and producing real activities. This chapter analyzes this thesis, examining it within the framework of Suárez’s metaphysics of the soul. It looks at the way he explains the necessity of habits, their generation, their co-operation with faculties, and their gradual changes. It emphasizes that habits are not simply “occult qualities,” as many early modern critics thought, but entities that play an important role. They are powers that make it possible to produce a wide range of activities in a quick and effortless way. Suárez’s realist theory of habits aims at explaining how they produce activities and why they must be accepted as parts of a complex network of psychic powers. A theory dispensing with habits would simply accept the existence of some activities as a brute fact.

Keywords

Suárez Habit Soul Faculty Disposition Mental act Habituation Form Hylomorphism Aristotelianism 

References

Primary Literature

  1. Francisco Suárez. 1861. Disputationes metaphysicae, ed. Carolus Berton. 2 vols. Opera Omnia 25–26. Paris: Vivès.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1978–1991. De anima, ed. Salvador Castellote. 3 vols. Madrid: Zubrini & Editorial Labor.Google Scholar
  3. Thomas Aquinas. 1952. Summa theologiae, ed. Petrus Caramello. 6 vols. Turin: Marietti.Google Scholar
  4. Thomas Hobbes. 1991. Leviathan, ed. Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Adams, Marilyn McCord. 1987. William Ockham. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Biard, Joël. 2012. Science et nature: La théorie buridanienne du savoir. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  3. Carruthers, Peter. 2006. The Architecture of the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Boer, Sander W. 2013. The Science of the Soul. The Commentary Tradition on Aristotle’s De anima, c. 1260–c. 1360 Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Des Chene, Dennis. 2000. Life’s Form: Late Aristotelian Conceptions of the Soul. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2013. From Habits to Traces. In A History of Habit: From Aristotle to Bourdieu, ed. Tom Sparrow and Adam Hutchinson, 121–131. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  7. Hutchison, Keith. 1982. What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution? Isis 73: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 1991. Dormitive Virtues, Scholastic Qualities, and the New Philosophies. History of Science 29: 245–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johansen, Thomas K. 2014. Parts in Aristotle’s Definition of Soul: De anima books I and II. In Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz, ed. Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler, 39–61. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Knuuttila, Simo. 2015. Suárez’s Psychology. In A Companion to Francisco Suárez, ed. Victor M. Salas and Robert L. Fastiggi, 192–220. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  11. Leduc, Christian. 2014. Leibniz et les qualités occultes. Studia Leibnitiana 46: 187–205.Google Scholar
  12. Löwe, Can L. 2014. Gregory of Rimini on the Intension and Remission of Corporeal Forms. Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 81: 273–330.Google Scholar
  13. Maier, Anneliese. 1968. Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie: Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik 2. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
  14. Nadler, Steven. 1998. Doctrines of Explanation in Late Scholasticism and in the Mechanical Philosophy. In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers, 513–552. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pelletier, Jenny E. 2013. William Ockham on Metaphysics: The Science of Being and God. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  16. Penner, Sydney. 2013. Free and Rational: Suárez on the Will. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perler, Dominik. 2014. Suárez on Consciousness. Vivarium 52: 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2015. Faculties in Medieval Philosophy. In The Faculties: A History, ed. Dominik Perler, 97–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rozemond, Marleen. 2012. Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez’s Soul. In The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez, ed. Benjamin Hill and Henrik Lagerlund, 154–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmid, Stephan. 2015. Efficient Causality: The Metaphysics of Production. In Suárez on Aristotelian Causality, ed. Jakob Leth Fink, 85–121. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shields, Christopher. 2014. Virtual Presence: Psychic Mereology in Francisco Suárez. In Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, ed. Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler, 199–218. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Tuttle, Jacob. 2016. Suárez’s Non-Reductive Thory of Efficient Causation. Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4: 125–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations