Advertisement

Acts and Dispositions in John Buridan’s Faculty Psychology

  • Jack ZupkoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action book series (HSNA, volume 7)

Abstract

John Buridan (ca. 1300–1361) uses the concepts of actus and habitus in his psychology to explain the difference between actual or occurrent thoughts and the dispositions to think those same thoughts. But since mental qualities are immaterial, Buridan must finesse his account of material qualities to save the psychological phenomena. He argues that thoughts and dispositions are really distinct from the human soul and from each other, and that because a thought and its corresponding disposition are different kinds of quality, we cannot say that they differ merely in terms of intensity. This leaves him with the unresolved problem of explaining how one kind of psychological quality can be caused by another that is qualitatively distinct from it.

Keywords

Act/Actual Alexander of Aphrodisias Disposition Habit Intensification/Diminution John Buridan John of Mirecourt Memory Modes Potency/Potential Species Thinking/Thought 

References

Primary Literature

  1. Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. Jonathan Barnes. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chartularium Universitatis parisiensis. 1889–1897. Ed. Heinrich Denifle and Emile Chatelain. 4 vols. Paris: Delalain.Google Scholar
  3. John Buridan. 2001. Summulae de dialectica. Trans. Gyula Klima. Yale Library of Medieval Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2015. Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam), libri I–II, ed. Michiel Streijger and Paul J.J.M. Bakker. Introduction by Johannes M.M.H. Thijssen. “A Guide to the Text” by Edith D. Sylla. History of Science and Medicine Library 50/Medieval and Early Modern Science 25. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. ———. Forthcoming. Quaestiones in libros Aristotelis De anima secundum tertiam sive ultimam lecturam. [Critical edition and English translation: book 1 edited and translated by Peter Hartman; book 2 edited by Peter Sobol and translated by Gyula Klima; book 3 edited and translated by Jack Zupko.] 3 vols. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Pseudo-Buridan. 1991. Quaestiones de anima, ed. Benoît Patar, Le traité de l’âme de Jean Buridan (De prima lectura): Édition, étude critique et doctrinale. Louvain: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Kretzmann, Norman. 1977. Socrates is whiter than Plato begins to be white. Noûs 11 (1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Long, A.A., and D.N. Sedley, eds. and Trans. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Maier, Anneliese. 1958. Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik, Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik 5. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
  4. Thijssen, J.M.M.H. 1998. Censure and Heresy at the University of Paris, 1200–1400. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Zupko, Jack. 2003. John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth-Century Arts Master. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2017. Intellect and intellectual activity in Buridan’s psychology. In Critical essays on the psychology of John Buridan, Historical-analytical studies on nature, mind, and action, ed. Gyula Klima, vol. 3, 183–192. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArtsUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations