Detecting Falls-from-Height with Wearable Sensors and Reducing Consequences of Occupational Fall Accidents Leveraging IoT

  • Onur DoganEmail author
  • Asli Akcamete
Conference paper


Labor intensive and hazardous nature of the construction activities plays an important role on the increase of the amount of accidents and fatalities on sites. One of the most important sources of fatalities occurring on construction sites is falls-from-height (FFH). Despite the various efforts for the solution over decades, the yearly statistics still indicate high amount of fatalities and severe injuries due to FFH accidents on construction sites. Medical literature emphasize that the time passed after the accident is a critical factor for avoiding preventable deaths and permanent disabilities of trauma patients. The objective of this study is to timely detect FFH accidents on construction sites by using a wearable device and to provide a real-time notification to the emergency medical team (EMT) leveraging Internet-of-Things (IoT). This is expected to maintain the earliest possible medical intervention on site in order to help reducing fatal and severe consequences of FFH accidents for construction workers. Test results of the system evaluation show that the fall is detected correctly and the alert message is sent to the prescribed addresses with 100% sensitivity. The system has shown a good accuracy for true detection of the fall height with an overall error rate of 10.8%. Another metric which shows the detection of the disconnected network time of the system has been surveyed and the results are accurate with an overall error rate of 3.16%.


Occupational health and safety Falls-From-Height Internet of things (IoT) Wearable sensors and devices Data acquisition 


  1. 1.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics: 2014 Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (revised data) (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics: Fatal Occupational Injuries by Industries and Event or Exposures - all United States (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, W., Yang, H., Chew, D.A.S., Yang, S.H., Gibb, A.G.F., Li, Q.: Towards an autonomous real-time tracking system of near-miss accidents on construction sites. Autom. Constr. 19, 134–141 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Commonly Used Statistics,
  5. 5.
    Nadhim, E.A., Hon, C., Xia, B., Stewart, I., Fang, D.: Falls from height in the construction industry: a critical review of the scientific literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 13, 638 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siddiqui, S.: US construction worker fall accidents: Their causes and influential factors., (2014)
  7. 7.
    Chan, A.P.C., Wong, F.K.W., Chan, D.W.M., Yam, M.C.H., Kwok, A.W.K., Lam, E.W.M., Cheung, E.: Work at height fatalities in the repair, maintenance, alteration, and addition works. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 134, 527–535 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harmsen, A.M.K., Giannakopoulos, G.F., Moerbeek, P.R., Jansma, E.P., Bonjer, H.J., Bloemers, F.W.: The influence of prehospital time on trauma patients outcome: a systematic review. Injury 46, 602–609 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Locker, T., Morris, F.P.: Pre-hospital Care, Triage and Trauma Scoring. Surg. 21, 197–201 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vermesan, O., Friess, P.: Internet of things applications—From research and innovation to market deployment. (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Swan, M.: Sensor Mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 1, 217–253 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Want, R., Schilit, B.N., Jenson, S.: Enabling the internet of things. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif). 48, 28–35 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Razzaque, M.A., Milojevic-Jevric, M., Palade, A., Clarke, S.: Middleware for internet of things: a survey. IEEE Int. Things J. 3, 70–95 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Awolusi, I., Marks, E., Hallowell, M.: Wearable technology for personalized construction safety monitoring and trending: review of applicable devices. Autom. Constr. 85, 96–106 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pannurat, N., Thiemjarus, S., Nantajeewarawat, E.: Automatic fall monitoring: a review. Sensors (Basel). 14, 12900–12936 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lara, O.D., Labrador, M.A.: A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 15, 1192–1209 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou, Z., Irizarry, J., Li, Q.: Applying advanced technology to improve safety management in the construction industry: a literature review. Constr. Manag. Econ. 31, 606–622 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skibniewski, M.: Research trends in information technology applications in construction safety engineering and management. Front. Eng. Manag. 1, 246 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marks, E.D., Teizer, J.: Method for testing proximity detection and alert technology for safe construction equipment operation. Constr. Manag. Econ. 31, 1–11 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Teizer, J.: Wearable, wireless identification sensing platform: self-Monitoring Alert and reporting technology for hazard avoidance and training (SmartHat). J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 20, 295–312 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhong, D., Lv, H., Han, J., Wei, Q.: A practical application combining wireless sensor networks and internet of things: safety management system for tower crane groups. Sensors 14, 13794–13814 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mubashir, M., Shao, L., Seed, L.: A survey on fall detection: principles and approaches. Neurocomputing 100, 144–152 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seo, J., Han, S., Lee, S., Kim, H.: Computer vision techniques for construction safety and health monitoring. Adv. Eng. Inform 29, 239–251 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Delahoz, Y.S., Labrador, M.A.: Survey on fall detection and fall prevention using wearable and external sensors. Sensors (Switzerland). 14, 19806–19842 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dzeng, R.J., Fang, Y.C., Chen, I.C.: A feasibility study of using smartphone built-in accelerometers to detect fall portents. Autom. Constr. 38, 74–86 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fang, Y.C., Dzeng, R.J.: Accelerometer-based fall-portent detection algorithm for construction tiling operation. Autom. Constr. 84, 214–230 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Abbate, S., Avvenuti, M., Bonatesta, F., Cola, G., Corsini, P., Vecchio, A.: A smartphone-based fall detection system. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 8, 883–899 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Akhavian, R., Behzadan, A.H.: Smartphone-based construction workers’ activity recognition and classification. Autom. Constr. 71, 198–209 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Habib, M., Mohktar, M., Kamaruzzaman, S., Lim, K., Pin, T., Ibrahim, F.: Smartphone-Based Solutions for Fall Detection and Prevention: Challenges and Open Issues. Sensors 14, 7181–7208 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Risser, D., Bönsch, A., Schneider, B., Bauer, G.: Risk of dying after a free fall from height. Forensic Sci. Int. 78, 187–191 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations