Advertisement

OpenBIM Based IVE Ontology: An Ontological Approach to Improve Interoperability for Virtual Reality Applications

  • Anne-Solene Dris
  • Francois Lehericey
  • Valerie Gouranton
  • Bruno Arnaldi
Conference paper

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an ontology improving the use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) models as a virtual interactive environment (IVE) generator. The result is not only the ability to create a bidirectional link between the informed 3D database and the virtual reality application, but to automatically generate object-specific functions and capabilities according to their taxonomy. We present the results based on the Risk-Hunting training application. In this context, the notions of weight, object handles and, scheduling of the construction are essential for the immersion of the future trainee and educational success.

Keywords

Building information modeling (BIM) Ontology Virtual and augmented reality Interoperability 

References

  1. 1.
    National Research and Safety Institute—INRS.: Statistiques Prvention. Available at: http://www.inrs.fr/actualites/statistiques-BTP-2014.html (2014)
  2. 2.
    Ho, C.L., Dzeng, R.J.: Construction safety training via e-Learning: learning effectiveness and user satisfaction. Computers and Education. Elsevier Ltd, 55(2), 858–867 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gao, Y., Gonzalez, V.A., Wing Yiu, T.: Serious games versus traditional tools in construction safety training: a review, 6(July), 653660 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barot, C., Lourdeaux, D., Burkhardt, J.M., Amokrane, K., Lenne, D.: V3S: A virtual environment for risk-management training based on human-activity models. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environ. 22(1), 1–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verna, D.: Virtual reality and tele-operation: a common framework. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI) Emergent Computing and Virtual Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 499–504 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fuchs, P., Moreau, G., Guitton, P. (eds.): Virtual Reality: Concepts and Technologies. CRC Press (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cherrett, T., et al.: Making training more cognitively effective: Making videos interactive. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 40(6), 11241134 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kozak, J.J., et al.: Transfer of training from virtual reaality. Ergonomics, 777–784 (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dris, A.-S., Gouranton, V., Arnaldi, B. : Integration concept and model of Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) for interactive virtual environments Integration concept and model of Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) for interactive virtual environments (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Technical report, KSL-01-05, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gruber, T. R.: Substantial revision of paper presented at the International workshop on formal ontology. Int. J. Hum. Comp. Stud. 43, 907–928 (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raja, R.A., Issa, Mutis, I.: Ontology in the AEC Industry: A Decade of Research and Development in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tibaut, A., et al.: Ontologizing the Heritage Building Domain, 10754(January) (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Costin, A., Eastman, C.: Requirements for Ontology Development in the AECO Industry. In: LC3 2017: Volume 1—Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3), July 4–7, 2017, Heraklion, Greece, pp. 553–540 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lenat, D., Guha, R.: Building large knowledge-based systems: Representation and inference in the cyc project. Artif. Intell. 61(1), 41–52. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(93)90092-P (1990).
  16. 16.
    Swartout, B. et al.: Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies. Proc. Tenth Workshop Knowl. Acquisition Knowl. Syst. 138–148. Available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Toward+Distributed+Use+of+Large-Scale+Ontologies#0 (1997)
  17. 17.
    Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., Jansweijer, W.: The KACTUS view on the “O” Word. IJCAI workshop on basic ontological issues in knowledge sharing, (October 2012), 159–168. Available at: http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl (1996)
  18. 18.
    Gomez-Perez, A., Fernandez, M., De Vicente, A.J.: Towards a method to conceptualize domain sure, Y., Staab, S., Struder, R.: (2001) On-To-Knowl. Methodol. Handb. Ontol. 117–132. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_6 (1996)
  19. 19.
    Fernandez, M., Gomez-Perez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. AAAI-97 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering. Stanford University (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beetz, J., Van Leeuwen, J., De Vries, B.: IfcOWL: A case of transforming EXPRESS schemas into ontologies. Ai Edam 23(1), 89–101 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gibaud, B, et al.: OntoSPM an ontology of surgical process modeling. URL: https://medicis.univ-rennes1.fr/activities/theme1/projects/ontospm (2016)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Solene Dris
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francois Lehericey
    • 1
  • Valerie Gouranton
    • 2
  • Bruno Arnaldi
    • 2
  1. 1.Vinci ConstructionRueil-MalmaisonFrance
  2. 2.Univ. Rennes, INSA Rennes, Inria, IRISA, CNRSRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations