Advertisement

Leisure Visitor’s Responses to Natural History Dioramas

  • Eirini GkouskouEmail author
  • Sue Dale Tunnicliffe
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the responses of leisure visitors who had chosen to visit a museum with natural history dioramas. Different ‘voices’ are heard from different visitors and during a visit constituent members influence what each other says because constructing meaning about the world is a social activity but their a reflection on the experience is individual as they leave. The visitor’s prior knowledge and the visitor’s interest in the exhibit, all have the potential to influence the visitor’s attitudes and responses to the exhibits. Some adults were asked questions at the diorama whilst other responses were from written responses on the questionnaire provided at the exit. The opinions of visitors to the dioramas were elicited through a questionnaire. They were asked to describe the ‘story’ of the diorama. There was a variation in responses depending on the age of the visitors. Young people’s responses were very factual and short whereas pensioners talked of memories such as working in one of the countries portrayed. Many visitors also related to what they had seen in the media.

Keywords

Visitor Dioramas Response Museum Natural history Agenda 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Director and staff and Susan Johnson of Quex Park for their help and enthusiasm in supporting this project.

References

  1. Adams, J. (2007). The historical context of science and education at the American museum on natural history. Culture Science Education, 2, 393–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos. York.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(1), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, D., Hilke, D., Kramer, R., Abrahams, C., & Dierking, L. (1997). Summative evaluation research: How thing fly- National Air and Space Museum. Unpublished evaluation report. Annapolis: Science Learning Incorporated.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, D., Lucas, K., & Ginns, L. (2003). Theoretical perspective on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. De Clercq, J. S. (2005). Museums as a mirror of society: A Darwinian look at the development of museums and collections of science. In P. Tirell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd conference of the International Committee for University Museums and Collections (pp. 57–65). Oklahoma: UMAC Publication.Google Scholar
  8. DeWitt, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2010). Supporting student learning: A comparison of student discussion in museums and classrooms. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diamond, J. (1991). Prototype interactive exhibits on rocks and minerals. Curator, 34(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, J. (2000). Moving toward innovation: Informal Science Education in University Natural History Museums. Curator, 43(2), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doering, Z. D., & Pekarik, A. J. (1996). Questioning the entrance narrative. Journal of Museum Education, 21(3), 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eshach, H. (2006). Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falk, J. (2009). Identity and museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek: Left Coast.Google Scholar
  16. Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  17. Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2009). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 8(5), 744–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falk, J., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors ‘agendas on museum learning. Curator, 41(2), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. (2009). Surrounded by science. Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fleer, M. (1994). Fusing the boundaries between home and child care to support children’s scientific learning. Research in Science Education, 26, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman, A. (2010). The evolution of the science museum. Physics Today, 63(10), 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilbert, J., Watts, M., & Osborne, J. (1985). Eliciting student views using an interview- about- instances technique. In L. West & L. A. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure & conceptual change. Orlando: Academic Press Inc..Google Scholar
  23. Griffin, J. (1998). Learning science through practical experiences in museums. International Journal of Science Education, 2(6), 655–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the student in school groups. Science Education, 88(1), 60–70.Google Scholar
  25. Groundwater-Smith, S., & Kelly, L. (2010). Learning outside the classroom: A partnership with a difference. In Α. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education (pp. 179–191). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hein, G. (1998). Learning in the museum. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Henderson, T., & Atencio, D. (2007). Integration of play, learning and experience: What museum afford young people. Early Childhood Education, 35, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofstein, A., & Rosenfield, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holmes, J. (2009). A cloud expedition at dioramas. In A. Scheersoi and S. D. Tunnicliffe (Eds.), The important role of natural history dioramas in biological learning (pp. 15–16). ICOM Natural History Committee Newsletter. No 29.Google Scholar
  30. Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1994). Who goes to museums? In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The educational role of the museum (pp. 47–60). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, S. (2015, March 26). Personal interview.Google Scholar
  32. Kelly, L., & Fitzgerald, P. (2011). Cooperation, collaboration, challenge: How to work with the changing nature of educational audiences in museums. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive enquiry (pp. 77–88). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Langebek, R. (2011). L’ amenagement des collections d’ Histoire naturelle aux XVLL et XIX siecles. La Lettre d L’ OCIM, 134, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, L. (2004). An emerging research framework for studying informal learning and schools. International Journal of Science Education, 88, 71–82.Google Scholar
  35. Mathewson, D. (2001). Museums and school: An analysis of the education ‘game’. Paper presented in the 18th Biennial Conference of the Australian Association, Canberra.Google Scholar
  36. McManus, P. (1988). Good companions: More on the social determination of learning- related behavior in science museum. International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, 7, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miglietta, A., Belmonte, G., & Boero, F. (2008). A summative evaluation of science learning: A case study of the marine biology museum “Pietro Parenzan”. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mironer, L. (1996). Les musees d’histoire naturelle dans une typologie des musees. La Lettre de L’ OCIM, 55, 67–71.Google Scholar
  39. Monhardt, L., & Monhardt, R. (2006). Creating a context for the learning on science process skills through picture books. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moussouri, T. (1997). Family agendas and family learning in hands-on museums. Unpublished doctoral thesis. UK: University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  41. Packer, J. (2008). Beyond learning: Exploring visitors’ perceptions of the value and benefits of museum experience. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paris, S., Yambor, K., & Packard, B. (1998). Hands- on biology: A museum school university partnership for enhancing students’ interest and learning in science. The Elementary School Journal, 98(3), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patrick, G. P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2013). Zoo talk. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piscitelli, B., & Anderson, D. (2001). Young children’s perspectives of museum settings and experiences. Museum Management and Curatorship, 19(3), 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piscitelli, B., McAndle, F., & Weier, K. (2003). Beyond looks and learns: Investigating, implementing and evaluating interactive learning strategies for young children in museums. Final Report, QUT-Industry Research Project. Brisbane, Australia: Centre for applied studies in early childhood, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  46. Powell-Cotton Museum. (2015a). Gallery 1. Retrieved from http://www.quexpark.co.uk/museum/museum-galleries/gallery-1.html. Last accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  47. Powell-Cotton Museum. (2015b). Gallery 2. Retrieved from http://www.quexpark.co.uk/museum/museum-galleries/gallery-2.html. Last accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  48. Powell-Cotton Museum. (2015c). Gallery 3. Retrieved from http://www.quexpark.co.uk/museum/museum-galleries/gallery-3.html. Last accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  49. Powell-Cotton Museum. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.quexpark.co.uk/museum. Last accessed 29 May 2016.
  50. Ramey-Gassert, L. (1997). Learning science beyond the classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rix, C., & McSorley, J. (2010). An investigation into the role that school- based interactive science centers may play in the education of primary- aged children. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robertson, H. L. (2015). The caring museum: New models of engagement with ageing. Edinburgh: Museums Etc.Google Scholar
  53. Schmitt-Scheersoi, A., Vogt, H., & Naumann, C. (2002). The development of situation interests in an informal learning environment- a visitor evaluation study in an educational exhibition on individuality. Proceedings from the IVth ERIDOB conference biology education for the real world, 22–26 October, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
  54. Tran, L. (2007). Teaching Science in Museums: The pedagogy goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91(2), 278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1995). Talking about animals: studies of young children visiting zoos, a museum and a farm. Unpublished PhD thesis. London: King’s College.Google Scholar
  56. Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. (1999). Building a model of the environments: How do children see animals? Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Scheersoi, A. (2011). Natural history dioramas. Dusty relics or essential tools for learning. In A. Fillippoupoliti (Ed.), Science exhibitions: Communication and evaluation (pp. 186–217). Edinburgh: Museum Etc.Google Scholar
  58. Tunnicliffe, S. D., Lucas, A. M., & Osborne, J. F. (1997). School visits to zoos and museums: A missed educational opportunity? International Journal of Science Education, 19(9), 1039–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of East LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.University College London (UCL), Institute of EducationLondonUK

Personalised recommendations