Advertisement

Neoliberal Governmentality and Ethico-politics of Power

  • Dilek Karal
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a detailed discussion and literature review of theoretical concepts and common themes covered in the book. The concepts of governmentality, disciplinary power, bio-power, and ethico-politics of power are introduced in a genealogical line of thought. The author builds her theoretical arguments on the works of Michel Foucault, Mitchell Dean, Gilles Deleuze, Nicolas Rose and Xavier Inda. In this chapter the author presents a theoretical foundation for her critique on modern immigration and asylum policies. The author argues that ethico-political power is an intrinsic part of neoliberal governmentality and immigration and asylum policymaking processes. She claims that ethico-political power is not only a discursive power, however, it is also prominent in the institutional practices of states and organizations. Genealogy of power is presented in the chapter in line with different forms of states, emphasizing the linkage between rise of ethico-political power in policymaking and the weakening of the welfare state ideal. Withdrawal of the social state has led to individuals and communities being substituted for states or international actors as the responsible bodies.

References

  1. Abrahamsen, R. (2004). The Power of Partnerships in Global Governance. Third World Quarterly, 25, 1453–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrighi, G. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Bashford, A. (2006). Global Bio-politics and the History of the World Health. History of the Human Sciences, 19, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best, J. (2007). Why the Economy Is Often Exception to Politics as Usual. Theory, Culture & Society, 24, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigo, D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, S. (2001). Class Struggle and the Global Overaccumulation of Capital. In R. Albrittron, M. Etoh, R. Westra, & A. Zuege (Eds.), Phases of Capitalist Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Cruikshank, B. (1999). The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. London: Cornel University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Danzelot, J. (1988). The Promotion of the Social. Economy and Society, 17(3), 395–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danzelot, J. (1991). The Mobilisation of Society. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 169–179). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  11. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Dean, H. (2006). Social Policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3–7.Google Scholar
  14. Dyer-Witheford, N., & Gruneau, R. (1993). Between the Politics of Production and the Politics of the Sign: Post-Marxism, Postmodernism and ‘New Times’. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 13, 69–91.Google Scholar
  15. Ferguson, J. (1990). Anti-politics Machine: Development, Depolitization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1978a). History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1978b). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College De France 1977–78 (2007th ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1979). Governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness, 6, 5–21.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1988). Michel Foucault, Technologies of the Self. In Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). London/New York: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population. London: St. Martin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Garland, D. (1996). The Limits of Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society. British Journal of Criminology, 36(4), 445–471. Retrieved from http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/4/445.shortCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon, C. (1991). Introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 1–51). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  25. Greenhalgh, S. (2008). Just One Child. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. New York: Wiley Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Huysmans, J. (2006). The Politics of Insecurity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inda, J. X. (2006). Targeting Immigrants: Government, Technology, and Ethics. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaeger, H. M. (2010). UN Reform, Bio-politics and Global Governmentality. International Theory, 2, 50–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. New York: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lemke, T. (2001). “The Birth of Bio-politics”: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neoliberal Governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120042271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin, L., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (1988). Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell, T. (1988). Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics and Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (2nd ed.). London: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ransom, J. S. (1997). Foucault’s Discipline: The Politics of Subjectivity. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roche, M. (2003). Mega-events, Time and Modernity On Time Structures in Global Society. Time & Society, 12(1), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rose, N. (2000). Government and Control. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salter, M. (2007). Governmentalities of an Airport. International Political Sociology, 1, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sassen, S. (1990). The Mobility of Labor and Capital: A Study in International Investment and Labor Flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Selby, J. (2007). Engaging Foucault: Discourse, Liberal Governance and the Limits of Foucauldian IR. International Relations, 21, 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1997). Policy: A New Field of Anthropology. In C. Shore & S. Wright (Eds.), Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power (pp. 3–39). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Straehle, C. (2007). Immigration, Individual Autonomy and Social Justice: An Argument for a Redistributive Immigration Policy. Montreal: McGill University.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, E. T. (1939). Race Relations and the Race Problem: A Definition and an Analysis (On-line). Durham: Duke University Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/racerelationsrac00thom
  46. Tickell, A., Sheppard, E., Peck, J., & Barnes, T. J. (Eds.). (1992). Politics and Practice in Economic Geography. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Topal, C. (2007). Surveillance Over Migrant Workers and Immigrants from Turkey in Germany: From the Disciplinary Society to the Society of Control. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Queen’s University (Canada), Canada. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304784422?accountid=13014
  48. Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality: Critical Encounters. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wedel, J. R., & Feldman, G. (2005). Why an Anthropology of Public Policy? Anthropology Today, 21(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zanotti, L. (2005). Governmentalizing the Post-Cold War International Regime: The Un-Debate on Democratization and Good Governance. Alternatives, 30, 461–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dilek Karal
    • 1
  1. 1.Bir Dünya Çocuk DerneğiGaziantepTurkey

Personalised recommendations