Advertisement

Sustainability and Energy Services: A Framework for Discussion

  • John H. PerkinsEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

Current energy services provide incalculable benefits, but they are not sustainable. Several factors cause unsustainability, but climate change is the most important and immediate risk. Moving to new energy systems requires focus on investment: the steady stream of monetary and social capital to build, maintain, operate, regulate, and decommission energy infrastructure. Investments develop primary energy sources and make them available to societies as energy services. Almost without exception, an investment must focus on a fuel–technology pair. An investment to develop natural gas, for example, cannot yield PV electricity, nor can an investment in wind turbines make coal into a useful source. Only nine primary energy sources are usable for energy services, and widespread assumptions hold that investments in renewable energy are more sustainable than investments in the currently dominant nonrenewable sources. Moving to higher dependence on renewable energy, however, requires the development of a finer analysis of the sustainability of the nine different energy sources. This paper proposes an energy–sustainability matrix, composed of five criteria currently in use, supplemented by four new criteria drawn from the concept of sustainability. Qualitative, ordinal standards then enable ranking of each of the nine primary energy sources, plus energy efficiency, with the nine criteria for investments. A complete analysis indicates the comparative strengths and weaknesses of each energy source. This matrix usefully frames a sociopolitical discussion for public policy and investment decisions.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am indebted to Dr. Tom Womeldorff for his advice on improving the specificity of the word “sustainability.” I am grateful to four anonymous reviewers who provided comments that improved the narrative. Thanks also go to the organizers of the 2018 Energy and Sustainability Conference for including this paper in the program.

References

  1. 1.
    Fell, M.J.: Energy services: a conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 27, 1129–1140 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Energy Agency: Key World Energy Statistics, p. 8. International Energy Agency, Paris (2017). (percent calculation by author)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Day, R., Walker, G., Simcock, N.: Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. Energy Policy 93, 255–264 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sterling, A.: Transforming power: social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1, 83–95 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCollum, D.L., et al.: Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 033006 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wrangham, R., Carmody, R.: Human adaptation to the control of fire. Evol. Anthropol. 19, 187–199 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkins, J.H.: Changing Energy: The Transition to a Sustainable Future, pp. 24–49. University of California Press, Oakland (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perkins: Changing Energy, pp. 136–165 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 676–678, 697 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    International Institute for Sustainable Development: What Is Sustainable Development? 23 March 2018. www.iisd.org/sd#one
  11. 11.
    Womeldorff, T.: Personal Communication, 9 April 2018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perkins: Changing Energy, pp. 202–209 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wrigley, E.A.: Energy and the English Industrial Revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010). 272 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perkins: Changing Energy, p. 138 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harrington, M.: The Other America: Poverty in the United States. Macmillan, New York (1961). 191 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobs, J.: The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books, New York (1961). 458 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carson, R.: Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston (1962). 368 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meadows, D., et al.: The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York (1972). 205 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lovins, A.: Soft Energy Paths: Towards a Durable Peace. Harper & Row, New York (1979). 231 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987). 383 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Herring, S.C., Christidis, N., Hoell, A., Kossin, J.P., Schreck III, C.J., Stott, P.A.: Introduction to explaining extreme events of 2016 from a climate perspective. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 99, S1–S6 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    United Nations: Paris Agreement (2015). Article 2Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perkins: Changing Energy, pp. 137–155 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Apostol, D., et al.: The Renewable Energy Landscape: Preserving Scenic Values on Our Sustainable Future. Routledge, Abingdon (2017). 286 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clό, A.: Oil Economics and Policy, p. 40. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2000). English translation of Economía e politica del petrolio sponsored by the European Society for Scientific PublicationsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Porter, T.: Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995). 310 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Perkins: Changing Energy, pp. 219–268 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mulier, V.: Recognizing the full scope of the right to take fish under the Stevens Treaties: the history of fishing rights litigation in the Pacific Northwest. Am. Indian Law Rev. 31, 42–92 (2006/2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stern, P.C., Fineberg, H.V. (eds.): Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington (1996). 249 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dietz, T., Stern, P.C.: Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. The National Academies Press, Washington (2008). 305 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Evergreen State CollegeKensingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations