The E-learning System for Teaching Bridging Mathematics Course to Applied Degree Studies

  • Maria Antonietta Lepellere
  • Irina CristeaEmail author
  • Donatella Gubiani
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 179)


Over the last decade it is becoming more common that traditional universities embrace also the e-learning system, because most students are working students (being not able to attend the courses) and most teachers noticed that using only their handouts or classical books is not enough for a good preparation of these students. The interactive materials, offered by the on-line tools, encourage faster and more intuitive learning. Therefore more dissemination articles, describing the experience of those universities/teachers exploring/using the e-learning system, are more common in literature. Also the current chapter aims to follow the same direction. In this work, we present a comparison between two universities, an Italian one (University of Udine) and a Slovenian one (University of Nova Gorica), situated at less than 50 km far away from one another, similar as the educational system, but different as their dimension (in numbers of students and professors/researchers). Our study is focussed on the e-learning system for teaching the math bridge-course to applied degrees studies.


E-learning Bridging math course Moodle platform 



We are grateful to all instructors who participated for the creation of the e-course of basic mathematics at the University of Udine and allowed us to collect the data necessary for this preliminary analysis. We also thank the referees for their useful comments and suggestions for possible future research developments.


  1. Albano, G., Ferrari, P.L.: Integrating technology and research in mathematics education: the case of e-learning. In: Garcia Penalvo, F.J. (ed.) Advances in E-learning: Experiences and Methodologies, pp. 132–148. Information Science Reference (IGI Global), Hershey (PA-USA) (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Alcock, L., Simpson, A.: Definitions: dealing with categories mathematically. Learn. Math. 22(2), 28–34 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Bardelle, C., Di Martino, P.: E-learning in secondary-tertiary transition in mathematics: for what purpose? ZDM 44(6), 787–800 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Luca, M., Vitacolonna, E., Genovese, L., Bolondi, G., Polcini, F.: Piattaforma E-Learning per una didattica per competenze in matematica. In: Atti del convegno AICA Didamatica 2012, Taranto, Italy (2012)Google Scholar
  5. Gubiani, D., Cristea, I., Urbančič, T.: Introducing e-learning to a traditional university: a case-study. In: Qualitative and Quantitative Models in Socio-Economic Systems and Social Work. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (2018)Google Scholar
  6. Gueudet, G.: Investigating the secondary tertiary transition. Educ. Stud. Math. 67, 237–254 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hošková, S.: Experience with Blended (Distance) Learning Study Materials, International Conference on Distance Learning, Simulation and Communication CATE 2009, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 70–77 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. Hošková, S., Račková, P.: Experience of mathematics blended-learning at university of defence adult learnings of mathematics. In: Proceedings of Contributions, ALM 14—Adults Learning Mathematics (ALM)—A Research Forum, Ireland, pp. 177–194 (2007). ISBN 0-9552717-3-8 Paperback book, ISBN 0-9552717-5-4, Format CDROM,Google Scholar
  9. Hošková-Mayerová, S., Rosická, Z.: E-Learning pros and cons: active learning culture? Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 191(2 June 2015), 958–962 (2015). ISSN 1877-0428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kajander, A., Lovric, M.: Transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics: McMaster University experience. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 36(2–3), 149–160 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Piccinini, L.C., Lepellere, M.A., Chang, T.F.M., Iseppi, L.: Structured knowledge in the frame of Bak-Sneppen models. Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math. 36 (2016). ISSN 2239-0227Google Scholar
  12. Romiszowski, A.J.: How’s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success of failure of an educational technology innovation. Educ. Technol. (Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ) 44(1), 5–27 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Sosnovsky, S., Dietrich, M., Andres, E., Goguadze, G., Winterstein, S., Libbrecht, P., et al.: Math-bridge: bridging the gaps in European remedial mathematics with technology-enhanced learning. In: Fischer, P., Hochmuth, R., Frischemeier, D., Wassong, T. (eds.) Using Tools for Learning Mathematics and Statistics, pp. 437–451. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  14. Zan, R.: Difficoltà in matematica. Osservare, interpretare, intervenire. Springer, Milano (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Antonietta Lepellere
    • 1
  • Irina Cristea
    • 2
    Email author
  • Donatella Gubiani
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal SciencesUniversity of UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.Center for Information Technologies and Applied MathematicsUniversity of Nova GoricaNova GoricaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations