Advertisement

Clinical Diagnosis

  • Alberto Borges Peixoto
  • Laudelino Marques Lopes
  • Edward Araujo Júnior
Chapter

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a common condition with high rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Due to the wide variety of clinical presentations, however, the exact definition and the best management of FGR remain elusive. Assessment based on maternal clinical history, measurement of symphysis-fundal height (SFH), obstetric ultrasonography, or a combination of the latter two appears to be an adequate tool for screening FGR in low-risk and unselected populations. At the same time, many underdeveloped or developing countries do not have access to ultrasonography to reliably determine the gestational age and assess fetal growth. Thus, SFH measurement is a noninvasive test that can be used to screen patients at high risk of FGR.

Keywords

Symphysis-fundal height Fetal growth restriction Small for gestational age Gestational age 

References

  1. 1.
    Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1976;71:159–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Figueras F, Gratacos E. An integrated approach to fetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCowan LM, Harding JE, Roberts AB, Barker SE, Ford C, Stewart AW. A pilot randomized controlled trial of two regimens of fetal surveillance for small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaziano EP, Knox N, Ferrera B, Brandt DG, Calvin SE, Knox GE. Is it time to reassess the risk for the growth-retarded fetus with normal Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical artery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:734–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harkness UF, Mari G. Diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Perinatol. 2004;31:743–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duff GB. A randomized controlled trial in a hospital population of ultrasound measurement screening for the small for dates baby. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;33:374–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kean LH, Liu DT. Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;16:77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindqvist PG, Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:258–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Pilalis A, Michalitsi V, Kassanos D. Performance of third-trimester ultrasound for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates and evaluation of contingency screening policies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:535–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rondo PH, Maia Filho NL, Valverde KK. Symphysis–fundal height and size at birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;81:53–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Estimation of fetal weight by symphysis–fundus height measurement. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;85:50–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morse K, Williams A, Gardosi J. Fetal growth screening by fundal height measurement. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:809–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matias A, Tiago P, Montenegro N. Calculation of gestational age. Methods and problems. Acta Medica Port. 2002;15:17–21.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hall MH, Carr-Hill RA, Fraser C, Campbell D, Samphier ML. The extent and antecedents of uncertain gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:445–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Persson PH, Kullander S. Long-term experience of general ultrasound screening in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:942–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geirsson RT, Busby-Earle RM. Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:108–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chiazze L Jr, Brayer FT, Macisco JJ Jr, Parker MP, Duffy BJ. The length and variability of the human menstrual cycle. JAMA. 1968;203:377–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 688: management of suboptimally dated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, Chalouhi GE, Ghi T, Kagan KO, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:102–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. London: RCOG Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakling J, Buhaug H, Backe B. The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:833–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    White LJ, Lee SJ, Stepniewska K, Simpson JA, Dwell SL, Arunjerdja R, et al. Estimation of gestational age from fundal height: a solution for resource-poor settings. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9:503–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neilson JP. Symphysis-fundal height measurement in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000944.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belizán JM, Villar J, Nardin JC, Malamud J, De Vicurna LS. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;131:643–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Small-for-gestational age fetus, investigation and management. RCOG Green Top Guideline 2013; No. 31.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gardosi J, Francis A. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:309–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Gravett MG, Hirst J, da Silveira MF, Lambert A, et al. International standards for symphysis-fundal height based on serial measurements from the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: prospective cohort study in eight countries. BMJ. 2016;355:i5662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robert Peter J, Ho JJ, Valliapan J, Sivasangari S. Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD008136.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Quaranta P, Currell R, Redman CW, Robinson JS. Prediction of small-for-dates infants by measurement of symphysial-fundal-height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88:115–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bais JM, Eskes M, Pel M, Bonsel GJ, Bleker OP. Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine growth retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low risk population: an observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;116:164–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hall MH, Chng PK, MacGillivray I. Is routine antenatal care worthwhile? Lancet. 1980;2:78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosenberg K, Grant JM, Hepburn M. Antenatal detection of growth retardation: actual practice in a large maternity hospital. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;9:12–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martinelli S, Bittar RE, Zugaib M. Prediction of fetal growth restriction by measurement of uterine height. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2004;26:383–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martinelli S, Bittar RE, Zugaib M. Proposal of a New Uterine Height Growth Curve for Pregnancies between 20 and 42 Weeks. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2001;23:235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goto E. Prediction of low birthweight and small for gestational age from symphysis-fundal height mainly in developing countries: a meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:999–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bailey SM, Sarmandal P, Grant JM. A comparison of three methods of assessing inter–observer variation applied to measurements of symphysis–fundus height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96:1266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pay A, Frøen JF, Staff AC, Jacobsson B, Gjessing HK. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age status by symphysis-fundus height: a registry-based population cohort study. BJOG. 2016;123:1167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haragan AF, Hulsey TC, Hawk AF, Newman RB, Chang EY. Diagnostic accuracy of fundal height and handheld ultrasound-measured abdominal circumference to screen for fetal growth abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:820.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Borges Peixoto
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Laudelino Marques Lopes
    • 4
  • Edward Araujo Júnior
    • 1
  1. 1.Discipline of Fetal Medicine, Department of ObstetricsPaulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP)São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Discipline of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Uberaba (UNIUBE)UberabaBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM)UberabaBrazil
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologySchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations