Skip to main content

Interopérabllité sémantique: comparaison de la représentation du score d’APGAR en HL7V3 et Open EHR

  • Conference paper
Risques, Technologies de l’Information pour les Pratiques Médicales

Part of the book series: Informatique et Santé ((INFORMATIQUE,volume 17))

  • 450 Accesses

Abstract

Semantic imeroperabdity. a prerequisite to eHea/th projects, relit’s 011 sharing both information and knowledge models between information systems. Two of the standards of information models are HL7 v3 and the European norm, EN13606/0penEHR. The paper compares both standards on a fr agment of the prenatal medical record, the APGAR score. The HL7v3 perinatology DMIM specification and the OpenEHR APGAR archetype were used. HL7v3 appear, to be more formal than Open EHR and able to represent in an easier way the clinical context. For both standards, the binding to reference terminologies such as LOINC is poor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Rector AL. Clinical terminology: why is it so hard. Methods of Information in Medicine 1999; 38(4–5): 239–252.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolin RH, et al. HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13(1): 30–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. CEN. Comité de Normalisation Européen. 2008 [cited 2008; Available from: http://www.cen.eu/cenorrnfhomepage.htrn.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beale T. Archetypes and the EHR. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 96: 238–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Apgar V. The newborn (Apgar) scoring system. Pediat Clin N Am 1966; 13: 645–650.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blobel BG, Engel K, Pharow P. Semantic interoperability—HL7 Version 3 compared to advanced architecture standards. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45(4): 343–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beale T. Archetypes: Constraint-based Domain Models for Future-proof Information Systems. OOPSLA 2002 workshop on behavioural semantics, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beale, T. and S. Heard, Archetype Definition Language (ADL). OpenEHR specification, the openEHR foundation, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meyer B. Eiffel: a language and environment for software engineering. Journal of Systems and Software 1988; 8(3): 199–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goossen WT, et al. Electronic patient records: domain message information model perinatology. Int J Med Inform 2003; 70(2–3): 265–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qamar R, Kola J, Rector AL. Unambiguous data modeling to ensure higher accuracy term binding to clinical terminologies. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007; 608–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Qarnar R, Rector AL. Semantic issues in integrating data from different models to achieve data interoperability. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129(Pt 1): 674–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gangemi A, et al. Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE 2002; 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ryan A. Towards semantic interoperability in healthcare: ontology mapping from SNOMED-CT to HL7 version 3. 2006: Australian Computer Society, Inc. Darlinghurst, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahar Bayat .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag France

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cuggia, M., Bayat, S., Poulain, P., Pladys, P., Robert, H., Duvauferrier, R. (2009). Interopérabllité sémantique: comparaison de la représentation du score d’APGAR en HL7V3 et Open EHR. In: Risques, Technologies de l’Information pour les Pratiques Médicales. Informatique et Santé, vol 17. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99305-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99305-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99304-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99305-3

Publish with us

Policies and ethics