Meteorological Observations

  • H. Howard Frisinger
Chapter
Part of the Meteorological Monographs book series (METEOR)

Abstract

The development of the instruments discussed in the preceding chapters was necessary to overcome the impediment which had developed in the fifteenth century to the evolution of scientific meteorology. The advent of the thermometer, barometer, hygrometer, etc., as scientific instruments, opened the way for a more comprehensive study of the atmosphere.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sir William Napier Shaw, Manual of Meteorology (Cambridge: The University Press, 1926), 1:11.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    There is no evidence that the Greek Tower of the Winds, mentioned in Chapter Three, was used as an observation station. Rather this temple was probably a place where the devout could offer prayers and gifts in view of obtaining the wind and weather most desired for agricultural and nautical purposes. See Richard Inwards, “Meteorological Observations,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 22, No. 98 (1896): 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gustav Hellmann, “The Dawn of Meteorology,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 34 (1908): 230.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., p. 231.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lynn Thorndike, “A Weather Record for 1399–1406 A.D.,” Isis 32 (1940): 304–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid., p. 306.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gustav Hellmann, Die Anfänge der Meteorologischen Beobachtungen und Instrumente (Berlin: 1890), p. 5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harvey A. Zinszer, “Meteorological Mileposts,” Scientific Monthly 17 (1944): 262.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gustav Hellmann, Die Anfängechrw(133), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., p. 16.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    For example, Descartes in 1647 proposed to take meteorological observations in concert with Mersenne. See René Descartes, Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Chas. Adam et Paul Tonnery (Paris: 1903), 5: 99.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Wolf, A History of Science, Technology, and Philosophy in the 16th and 17th Centuries (London: Allen & Unwin, 1935), p. 312.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blaise Pascal, The Physical Treatise of Pascal, trans. I.H.B. and A.G.H. Spiers (New York: Columbia University Press, 1937), p. 116.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolf, op. cit., p. 312.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hellmann, in his article “The Dawn of Meteorology,” states that he found 123 different series of meteorological observations belonging to the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries. This number undoubtedly represents a small proportion of the total number of such observations throughout Europe.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    For a detailed account of the meteorological activity of the Accademia del Cimento, see G. Hellmann, Evangelista Torricelli, Esperienza dell’argento vivo. Accademia del Cimento,chrw(133) (Berlin: A. Asher & Co., 1897), pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas Sprat, History of the Royal Society (London: 1667), pp. 173–179.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Willis L. Webb, “Missile Range Meteorology,” Weatherwise 16 (1963): 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Philippe De La Hire, “Observations of the quantity of water which fell at the observatory during the year 1709, with the state of the thermometer and barometer,” Memoirs of the Royal Academy of Science (Paris: 1710) pp. 356–358.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ibid., pp. 356–357.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Wolf, A History of Science, Technology, and Philosophy in the 18th Century (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1939), p. 284.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    James Jurin, “Invitatio ad Observationes Meteorologicas communi consilio instituendas,” Phil. Trans. 32 (1723): 422–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Howard Frisinger, “Isaac Greenwood: Pioneer American Meteorologist,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 48, No. 4 (1967): 265–267.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Isaac Greenwood, “A New Method for Composing the Natural History of Meteors,” Phil. Trans. 35 (1728): 390–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Greenwood was not the first to take regular meteorological observations on the American Continent. This honor apparently goes to Rev. John Campanius, who from 1644–1645 maintained a weather record at Swedes’ Fort, near Wilmington, Del. See “A Chronological Outline of the History of Meteorology in the United States of North America,” Monthly Weather Review (March 1909): 87.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roger Pickering, “Scheme of a Diary of the Weather, together with draughts and descriptions of Machines subservient thereunto,” Phil. Trans. 43 (1744): 6–7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    The Royal Society did not begin its own meteorological register until 1774, and then it only lasted seven years.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G.J. Symons, “The History of English Meteorological Societies, 1823 to 1880,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 7 (1881): 66–68.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    In the back of his work Physicae experimentales et geometricaechrw(133) (Lugduni Batavorum: 1729), Musschenbroek has included the printed record of the meteorological observations which he made at Utrecht in 1728, and in which he employed these symbols to represent meteorological phenomena.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolf, 18th Century, p. 287.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J.H. Lambert, “Esposé de quelques Observations qu’on pourroit faire pour répandre du jour sur la Météorologie,” Nouveaux Memoires de l’Academie Royale des Science (Berlin: 1771): 60–65.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Blaise Pascal, The Physical Treatises of Pascal, trans. I.H.B. and A.G.H. Spiers (New York: Columbia University Press, 1937), p. xvi.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ibid., pp. xvi-xvii.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Napier Shaw, The Drama of Weather, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: The University Press, 1939), p. 46.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. Wootton, “The Physical Work of Descartes,” Science Progress 21 (1927): 477.Google Scholar
  36. See also C. Adam, “Pascal et Descartes,” Revue Philosophique 24 (1887), pp. 612–624; 25 (1888): 65–90Google Scholar
  37. R. Duhem, “Le Pere Marin Mersenne et la pesanteur de l’air,” Revue Generale des Sciences 17 (1906): 809–817.Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    Pascal, op. cit., p. 164.Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    Here Torricelli is apparently referring to the experiments of Galileo.Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    Florian Cajori, “History of determinations of the heights of mountains,” Isis 12 (1929): 499–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. For an English translation of the letters between Pascal and Perier concerning this experiment, see Forest R. Moulton and Justus J. Schifferes (eds.), The Autobiography of Science (New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc., 1953), pp. 148–152.Google Scholar
  42. 39.
    Florian Cajori, “History of determinations of the heights of mountains,” Isis 12 (1929): p. 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 40.
    Pascal, op. cit., pp. 63–66.Google Scholar
  44. 41.
    Robert Boyle, The Work of the Honourable Robert Boyle (London: 1744), 1:97–104.Google Scholar
  45. 42.
    Another probable factor was that he was a close assistant in Boyle’s experiments with the elasticity of air. See Margaret Espinasse, Robert Hooke (London: William Heinemann, Ltd., 1956), p. 46.Google Scholar
  46. 43.
    Robert Hooke, Micrographia (London: 1665), pp. 221–228.Google Scholar
  47. 44.
    Ibid., p. 228.Google Scholar
  48. 45.
    Bernard De Lindenau, Tables Barometriques (Gotha: 1809), p. xxi.Google Scholar
  49. 46.
    Edme. Mariotte, Oeuvres de M. Mariotte (La Haye: 1740), 1: 148–182.Google Scholar
  50. 47.
    Twelve successive applications of this process gave an altitude of nearly thirty-five miles. Mariotte stopped here as he had no evidence that air could be expanded beyond the degree of rarefaction which it would have at this altitude.Google Scholar
  51. 48.
    Florian Cajori. “History of determinations of the heights of mountains,” Isis 12 (1929): 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 49.
    Mariotte, op. cit., pp. 174–175.Google Scholar
  53. 50.
    Edmund Halley. “On the height of the Mercury in the Barometer at different Elevations above the Surface of the Earth; and on the Rising and Falling of the Mercury on the Change of Weather.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1686): 104–116.Google Scholar
  54. 51.
    Logarithms had been first invented in 1614 by John Napier. For a thorough account of the history of logarithms, see Cargill G. Knott, Napier memorial volumes (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1915).Google Scholar
  55. 52.
    Halley, op. cit., p. 109. The development by Halley of this formula can be summarized in modem mathematical notation as follows: by Boyle’s Law pv = constant = 30 x 900 (Halley’s constant). Thus, the cylinder of air reaching from sea-level to the place where the barometric reading is h, is \(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\int {vdp = \int_h^{30} {(30 \times 900)\frac{{dp}}{p}} = [(30 \times 900)\log p]} \int_h^{30} {} } \\ { = 30 \times 900 \times (\log 30 - \log h)} \end{array}\) Changing from natural to common logarithms, by dividing by the modulus 0.434295, and by simplifying, Halley’s formula is obtained.Google Scholar
  56. 53.
    Halley, op. cit., p. 109.Google Scholar
  57. 54.
    Later in this work by Halley, he attempts to explain the reasons for the changes in the barometric readings at sea-level.Google Scholar
  58. 55.
    See H. Howard Frisinger, “Mathematicians in the History of Meteorology: The Pressure-Height Problem,” Historia Mathematica 1 (1974): 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Meteorological Society 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Howard Frisinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Colorado State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations