Advertisement

Osteonecrosis

  • Michael G. Zywiel
  • Mike S. McGrath
  • Michael A. Mont

Abstract

Osteonecrosis, literally “bone death,” is the loss of viable bone tissue Up to 10% of all hip replacement procedures in the U.S. are performed for osteonecrosis. Major risk factors for osteonecrosis include glucocor-ticoid use, alcohol, cigarette smoking, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), scuba diving, and major hip trauma, leading to disruption of the vascular supply to the femoral head. Patients who have identifiable risk factors for osteone-crosis are said to have secondary osteonecrosis. Idiopathic osteonecrosis occurs in some individuals without overt risk factors for the disorder. Clinical outcomes are better in patients who are treated at early stages of the disease. Patients who have large osteonecrotic lesions or femoral head collapse at the time of presentation will typically progress to end-stage degenerative disease requiring joint arthroplasty. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the study of choice for patients in whom there is a high index of suspicion of osteonecrosis. Core decompression is a relatively noninvasive joint preservation technique that may be effective if applied to patients with early disease. Hip resurfacing is a joint arthroplasty technique that requires less resection of native bone compared with traditional joint arthroplasty procedures.

Keywords

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Femoral Head Joint Arthroplasty Core Decompression Femoral Head Collapse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anonymous. Necrosis of the lower jaw in makers of Lucifer matches. Am J Dent Sci. 1867;1(series 3):96–7Google Scholar
  2. Buergi ML, Walter WL. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):61–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee YK, Yoo JJ, Koo KH, et al Collapsed subchondral fatigue fracture of the femoral head. Orthop Clin N Am 2009;40:259–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Legroux Gerot I, Demondion X, Louville AB, et al Subchondral frac tures of the femoral head: a review of seven cases. Joint Bone Spine 2004;2(71):131–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Seyler TM, Marker D, Mont MA. Osteonecrosis. In: Klippel JH, Stone JH, Crofford LJ, White PH, eds. Primer on the rheumatic diseases. 13th ed. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2008:565–572Google Scholar
  6. Seyler TM, Marker D, Mont MA. Osteonecrosis. In: Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases. Klippel JH, Stone JH, Crofford LJ, White PH. Springer 2008Google Scholar
  7. Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;9(61):1115–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mitchell MD, Kundel HL, Steinberg ME, et al Avascular necrosis of the hip: comparison of MR, CT, and scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;1(147):67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mont MA, Carbone JJ, Fairbank AC. Core decompression versus non operative management for osteonecrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:169–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, et al Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:66–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Marker DR, et al Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 3):90–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mont MA, Tomek IM, Hungerford DS. Core decompression for avascu-lar necrosis of the distal femur: long term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;334:124–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mont MA, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, et al Bone scanning of limited value for diagnosis of symptomatic oligofocal and multifocal osteonecro-sis. J Rheumatol. 2008;8(35):1629–34Google Scholar
  14. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;5(88): 592–600Google Scholar
  15. Revell MP, McBryde CW, Bhatnagar S, et al Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 3):98–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:123–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zywiel MG, McGrath MS, Seyler TM, et al Osteonecrosis of the knee: a review of three disorders. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40: 193–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zywiel MG, Marker DR, McGrath MS, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preopera-tive activity levels — a comparison of postoperative outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009;67(2):116–9PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael G. Zywiel
    • 1
  • Mike S. McGrath
    • 1
  • Michael A. Mont
    • 1
  1. 1.Sinai Hospital of BaltimoreCenter for Join Preservation and Reconstruction, Rubin for Advanced OrthopedicsBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations