Advertisement

Digital Elevation Models to Support Desert Warfare

  • Peter L. GuthEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Military Geosciences book series (AMG)

Abstract

Digital elevation models (DEMs) provide a fundamental resource for terrain analysis and military mission planning. Recent developments have changed the quality of the DEMs available worldwide. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) flew in 2000 and created DEMs with resolutions of 1ʺ (~ 30 m) for the US military and 3ʺ (~ 90 m) freely available for the general public. The SRTM covered all the earth except for high latitude regions. For the rest of the world its major limitations are the data voids in regions of high relief. Less publicized are the voids in dry desert sand, which account for a larger fraction of the voids than those in high mountains. In contrast to the active radar used for SRTM, which worked day/night and through clouds, the more recent ASTER GDEM used near infrared energy which only worked in daylight and could not penetrate clouds. Development of the ASTER GDEM required years of data collection for relatively complete coverage. Significant anomalies were present in version 1, in large part due to undetected clouds. Version 2 of GDEM offered improvements, but still has anomalies, and the desert regions have the largest concentration of poorly correlated GDEM and SRTM. SRTM or GDEM can provide terrain data for large area, small scale military operations. For very large scale operations, interferometric synthetic aperture radar (IFSAR) DEMs provide point spacings of 3–5 m and LiDAR provides spacings of about 1 m. These data sets are much less widely and freely available, in part because of the huge volume of data: SRTM 3ʺ requires 35 GB for global coverage, ASTER GDEM about 561 GB, and 1 m LiDAR will require about 1000 TB for full coverage. LiDAR point clouds offer additional visualization and analysis capabilities compared to traditional grids.

Keywords

DEMs SRTM ASTER GDEM LiDAR 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank intern Michelle Nie for downloading ASTER data covering a range of climate regions. ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA.

References

  1. Amante C, Eakins BW (2009) ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis: NOAA technical memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/relief/ETOPO1/docs/ETOPO1.pdf. Accessed June 2014
  2. Bullard JE, White K, Livingstone I (2011) Morphometric analysis of aeolian bedforms in the Namib Sand Sea using ASTER data. Earth Surf Proc L 36:534–1549. doi:10.1002/esp.2189Google Scholar
  3. Butkiewicz T, Chang R, Wartell Z, Ribarsky W (2008) Visual analysis and semantic exploration of urban LiDAR change detection. Comput Graph Forum 27:903–910. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8659.2008.01223.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Danielson JJ, Gesch DB (2011) Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010): U.S. geological survey open-file report 2011–1073. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1073/. Accessed June 2014
  5. Evans JS, Hudak AT (2007) A multiscale curvature algorithm for classifying discrete return LiDAR in forested environments. Geosci Remote Sens 45:1029–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, 15 others (2007) The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys 45(2):RG2004. doi:10.1029/2005RG000183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fowler RA, Samberg A, Flood MJ, Greaves TJ (2007) Topographic and terrestrial LiDAR. In: Maune DF (ed) Digital elevation model technologies and applications: the DEM user’s manual, 2nd Edn. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD, p 199–252Google Scholar
  8. Guth PL (2006) Geomorphometry from SRTM: comparison to NED. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 72:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guth PL (2007) Global SRTM geomorphometric atlas. Conference proceedings for Geocomputation 2007, NUI Maynooth, Ireland, 3–5 September 2007, #P07, 6Google Scholar
  10. Guth PL (2010) Geomorphometric comparison of ASTER GDEM and SRTM. Conference proceedings for ASPRS/CaGIS 2010 fall specialty conference, Orlando, FL, November 15–19, 10Google Scholar
  11. Hengl T, Reuter HI (2011) How accurate and usable is GDEM? A statistical assessment of GDEM using LiDAR data. In: Hengl T, Evans lS, Wilson JP, Gould M (eds) Geomorphometry. Redlands, CA, 2011, 45–48. http://www.geomorphometry.org/HenglReuter2011. Accessed June 2014
  12. Hensley S, Munjy R, Rosen P (2007) Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (IFSAR). In: Maune DF (ed) Digital elevation model technologies and applications: the DEM user’s manual, 2nd edn. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, pp 142–206.Google Scholar
  13. Hugenholtz CH, Barchyn TE (2010) Spatial analysis of sand dunes with a new global topographic dataset: new approaches and opportunities. Earth Surf Proc L 35:986–992. doi:10.1002/esp.2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Intermap Technologies (2012) NEXTMAP. http://www.intermap.com/Portals/0/doc/Brochures/INTERMAP_NEXTMap_English.pdf. Accessed June 2014
  15. Japan Space Systems (2012) GDEM data use. http://www.jspacesystems.or.jp/ersdac/GDEM/E/3.html. Accessed June 2014
  16. Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E (2008) SRTM 90m digital elevation data, Version 4. http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org. Accessed June 2014
  17. JPL (2005) Shuttle radar topography mission. http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/coverage.html. Accessed July 2012
  18. Mallet C, Bretar F (2009) Full-waveform topographic LiDAR: state-of-the-art. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maune DF, Kopp SM, Crawford CA, Zervas CE (2007) Introduction. In: Maune DF (ed) Digital elevation model technologies and applications: the DEM user’s manual. American society for photogrammetry and remote sensing, Bethdsda, pp 1–36Google Scholar
  20. Meyer D (2011) ASTER global digital elevation model version 2 – summary of validation results: NASA land processes distributed active archive center and the joint Japan-US ASTER science team. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/aster_products_table/aster_gdem_version_2_validation. Accessed June 2014
  21. McLaughlin RA (2006) Extracting transmission lines from airborne LiDAR data. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 3:222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NASA (2013) NASA shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) V3.0 product released by LPDAAC. https://earthdata.nasa.gov/about-eosdis/news/nasa-shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm-v30-product-release-lpdaac. Accessed June 2014
  23. NOAA (2014) Coastal LiDAR. http://csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/dataregistry/#/coastallidar. Accessed June 2014
  24. OpenTopgraphy (2012) OpenTopography: a portal to high-resolution topography data and tools. http://www.opentopography.org/. Accessed June 2014
  25. PDS Geosciences Node (2012) ATM NTS explosion crater observations. http://geo.pds.nasa.gov/missions/earth_lidar/index.htm. Accessed July 2012
  26. Priestnalla G, Jaafara J, Duncan A (2000) Extracting urban features from LiDAR digital surface models. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rubel F, Kottek M (2010) Observed and projected climate shifts 1901–2100 depicted by world maps of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Meteorol Z 19:135–141. doi:10.1127/0941–2948/2010/0430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sithole G, Vosselman G (2006) Bridge detection in airborne laser scanner data: ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 61:33–46Google Scholar
  29. Trinder J, Salah M (2011) Disaster change detection using airborne LiDAR. Proceedings of the surveying & spatial sciences biennial conference 2011, 21–25 November 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 231–242Google Scholar
  30. USGS (2006) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), Fact Sheet 071–03. http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb//pubs/factsheets/fs07103.html. Accessed Nov 2015
  31. USGS (2012) Index of/srtm/version2_1. http://dds.cr.usgs.gov/srtm/version2_1/. Accessed June 2014
  32. USGS (2014) Earth explorer. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/. Accessed June 2014
  33. Whitlock C (2012) U.S. expands secret intelligence operations in Africa: Washington Post, June 13. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-expands-secret-intelligence-operations-in-africa/2012/06/13/gJQAHyvAbV_story.html. Accessed July 2012
  34. Zhou G, Ming X (2009) Coastal 3-D morphological change analysis using LiDAR series data: a case study of Assateague Island National Seashore. J Coastal Res 25:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OceanographyUS Naval AcademyAnnapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations