Advertisement

Overcoming Technical Challenges: The Abdomen

  • Eric K. JohnsonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Laparoscopic colectomy presents several challenges to the surgeon. There are many specific steps in a procedure that may be associated with difficulty and pitfalls. The goal of this chapter is to clearly define technical challenges associated with the abdominal portion of various laparoscopic colectomy procedures, outline strategies to deal with these challenges, and make the reader aware of potential pitfalls associated with these challenges. Often, these tasks will require the use of more than one described method to achieve the final goal.

Keywords

Transverse Colon Splenic Flexure Laparoscopic Colectomy Inferior Mesenteric Artery Energy Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 18.1

This video shows how the hand can be useful during dissection and retraction (M4V 36624 kb)

Video 18.2

Division of vascular splenic flexure attachments is depicted in this video (M4V 29389 kb)

Video 18.3

Hepatic flexure mobilization and the approach to the transverse colon are depicted in this film (M4V 57232 kb)

Video 18.4

The proper use of advanced energy to divide the inferior mesenteric artery is shown (M4V 7566 kb)

Video 18.5

Division of the middle colic artery is shown with a stapling device. The technique depicted is incorrect and bleeding results. Corrective action is shown (M4V 81024 kb)

Video 18.6

Use of hand assistance to determine the presence of an anastomotic volvulus is shown (M4V 41127 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, Read TE, Arnell TD, Birnbaum EH, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:818–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia-Ruiz A, Milsom JW, Ludwig KA, Marchesa P. Right colonic arterial anatomy. Implications for laparoscopic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:906–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Le TH, Gathright JB. Reconstitution of intestinal continuity after extended left colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:197–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Causey MW, Oguntoye M, Steele SR. Incidence of complications following colectomy with mesenteric closure vs no mesenteric closure: does it really matter? J Surg Res. 2011;171:571–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld M. An initial experience with lighted ureteral catheters during laparoscopic colectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994;4:399–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pacheco PE, Hill SM, Henriques SM, Paulsen JK, Anderson RC. The novel use of intraoperative laser-induced fluorescence of indocyanine green tissue angiography for evaluation of the gastric conduit in esophageal reconstructive surgery. Am J Surg. 2013;205:349–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Madigan Army Medical CenterJoint Base Lewis, McChordUSA

Personalised recommendations