Advertisement

The Application of Fracture Mechanics to Pipeline Design

  • A. A. Wells
Part of the Sagamore Army Materials Research Conference Proceedings book series (SAMC)

Abstract

Gas and oil pipelines are characteristically designed to accept yielding under hydrotesting and are operated at high design pressure stresses in relation to yield. The service defects which must be tolerated include stress corrosion cracks and mechanical impact damage from construction machinery, such that elastic-plastic bulging may precede fracture. These conditions lead to use of fracture mechanics in fracture control, although mainly through the ubiquitous Charpy V test.

These aspects of fracture mechanics will be reviewed in this chapter, with separate references to the conditions for crack initiation under static conditions, and the control of running brittle and ductile shear cracks. Reference will also be made to recent work on relationships between scatter in notch toughness tests, and probabilities of failure.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sailors, R.H. and Corten, H.T. “Relationship Between Material Fracture Toughness using Fracture Mechanics and Transition Temperature Tests”, in Fracture Toughness, Special Technical Publication 514. Philadelphia: Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials (1972), 164–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Novak, S.R., “Resistance to Plane-Stress Fracture (R-Curve Behavior) of A572 Structural Steel”, in Mechanics of Crack Growth, Special Technical Publication 590. Philadelphia: Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials (1976), 235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wells, A.A., “Crack Opening Displacements from Elastic-Plastic Analyses of Externally Notched Tension Bars”, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1 (1969), 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyle, E.F., “Calculation of Elastic Plastic Crack Extension Forces”, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Queen’s University of Belfast, 1972.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sumpter, J.D.G., “Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis and Design using the Finite Element Method”, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, 1973/74.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hutchinson, J.W., “Singular Behaviour at the End of a Tensile Crack in a Hardening Material”, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 16 (1968), 13.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heyer, R.H., “Crack Growth Resistance Curves (R-Curves) — Literature Review”, in Fracture Toughness Evaluation by R-Curve Methods, Special Technical Publication 527. Philadelphia: Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials (1973), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heyer, R.H. and McCabe, D.E., “Crack Growth Resistance in Plane-Stress Fracture Testing”, Eng. Frac. Mech., 4 (1972), 413–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Folias, E.S., “An Axial Crack in a Pressurized Cylindrical Shell”, Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1 (1965), 104–11.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erdogan, F. and Ratwani, M., “The Use of COD and Plastic Instability in Crack Propagation and Arrest in Shells, Paper 6, Crack Propagation in Pipelines”, presented at the British Gas Corporation and Institution of Gas Engineers Symposium, Newcastle, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wells, A.A., “Fracture Control: Past, Present and Future”, Exp. Mech., 13 (1973), 401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shannon, R.W.E. and Wells, A.A., “Brittle Crack Propagation in Gas Filled Pipelines — A Model Study using Thin Walled Unplasticised PVC Pipe”, Int. J. Fract., 10 (1974), 471–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erdogan, F. and Kibler, J.J., “Cylindrical and Spherical Shells with Cracks”, Int. J. Fract. Mech., 5 (1969), 229–37.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanninen, M.F., Sampath, S.G. and Popelar, C., “Steady-State Crack Propagation in Pressurized Pipelines without Backfill”, ASME Paper 75-PVP-39, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Becher, P.E. and Pedersen, A., Paper presented at 2nd Intl. Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Berlin, 1973, Paper No. M6/4.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Neil, R. and Jordan, G.M., “Safety and Reliability Requirements for Periodic Inspection of Pressure Vessels in the Nuclear Industry”, in Proceedings of Conference on Periodic Inspection of Pressure Vessels, London, England, May 9–11, 1972. London: Institute of Mechanical Engineers (1972), 140–146.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams, M.L., “Analysis of Brittle Behavior in Ship Plates”, in Symposium on Effect of Temperature on the Brittle Behavior of Metals with Particular Reference to Low Temperatures, Special Technical Publication 158. Philadelphia: Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials (1954), 11–44.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brittle Fracture in Steel Structures, Ed. by G.M. Boyd. London: Butterworth & Co. (Publishers), Ltd. (1970), 5–11, 89 (Fig 6.4).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phillips, C.A.G. and Warwick, R.G., “A Survey of Defects in Pressure Vessels”, AN5B (s) R162, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kellerman, O. and Tietzle, A., IAEA Technical Report 99, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Wells
    • 1
  1. 1.The Welding InstituteAbington HallCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations