Advertisement

Introduction: The Helium Problem

  • William E. Keller
Chapter
Part of the The International Cryogenics Monograph Series book series (INCMS)

Abstract

The history of attempts to understand the behavior of helium at low temperatures has been full of surprises, and this factor, probably more than any other, has stimulated the continuous and accelerating growth of helium research since 1908 when Kamerlingh Onnes first liquefied He4. The liquefaction itself, occurring at the then incredibly low temperature of 4°K, was indeed a triumph and perhaps the first of the surprises, since at that time the idea of “persistent gases” was still prevalent—and helium was the last of these to undergo reduction to the liquid state. However, subsequent investigations of this apparently simple substance have uncovered an abundance of complexities and surprises which in turn have sustained a remarkably high interest in the subject.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. H. Keesom, Helium, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1942).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. R. Atkins, Liquid Helium, Cambridge University Press (1959).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. R. Atkins and Y. Narahara, Phys. Rev., 138, A437 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. C. Kerr and R. D. Taylor, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 26, 292 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. G. Henshaw, Phys. Rev., 119, 9 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Wiebes, C. G. Niels-Hakkenberg, and H. C. Kramers, Physica, 23, 625 (1957).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. R. de Groot, Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Chapter III, North Holland, Amsterdam (1952).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. R. Atkins, Phys. Rev., 113, 962 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. W. F. Everitt, K. R. Atkins, and A. Denenstein, Phys. Rev. Letters, 8, 161 (1962);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9a.
    C. W. F. Everitt, K. R. Atkins, and A. Denenstein, Phys. Rev., 136, A1494 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    J. R. Pellam, Phys. Rev., 73, 608 (1948).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    I. Rudnick and K. A. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Letters, 9, 191 (1962);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 11a.
    K. A. Shapiro and I. Rudnick, Phys. Rev., 137, A1383 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    F. London, Superfluids, Vol. II, John Wiley, New York (1954).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    D. F. Brewer and D. O. Edwards, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A251, 247 (1959);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 13a.
    W. E. Keller and E. F. Hammel, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 10, 202 (1960).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 14.
    G. V. Chester, in Liquid Helium (G. Careri, ed.), p. 51, Academic Press, New York (1963).Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    J. Franck, Phys. Rev., 70, 983 (1946).Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    K. W. Taconis and R. De Bruyn Ouboter, in Progress in Low Temperature Physics (C. J. Gorter, ed.), Vol. IV, p. 38, North Holland, Amsterdam (1964).Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    H. E. Hall, in Superfluid Helium (J. F. Allen, ed.), p. 7, Academic Press, London (1966).Google Scholar
  21. 18.
    J. de Boer and R. J. Lunbeck, Physica, 14, 510 (1948).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 19.
    J. de Boer, Physica, 14, 139 (1948).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 20.
    E. F. Hammel, in Progress in Low Temperature Physics (C. J. Gorter, ed.), Vol. I, p. 78, North Holland, Amsterdam (1955);Google Scholar
  24. 20a.
    V. P. Peshkov and K. N. Zinov’eva, Reports on Progress in Physics, 22, 504 (1959);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 20b.
    E. R. Grilly and E. F. Hammel, in Progress in Low Temperature Physics (C. J. Gorter, ed.), Vol. III, p. 113, North Holland, Amsterdam (1961).Google Scholar
  26. 21.
    A. M. Sessler in Helium Three (J. G. Daunt, ed.), p. 81, Ohio State University Press (1960).Google Scholar
  27. 22.
    V. P. Peshkov, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz., 46, 1510 (1964) [English translation, Soviet Phys.—JETP, 19, 1023 (1964)];Google Scholar
  28. 22a.
    V. P. Peshkov,Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz., 48, 997 (1965) [English translation, Soviet Phys.—JETP, 21, 663 (1965)].Google Scholar
  29. 23.
    W. R. Abel, A. C. Anderson, W. C. Black, and J. C. Wheatley, Physics, 1, 337 (1965).Google Scholar
  30. 24.
    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev., 108, 1175 (1957).ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 25.
    J. M. Blatt, Theory of Superconductivity, Academic Press, New York (1964).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 26.
    W. M. Fairbank, W. B. Ard, and G. K. Walters, Phys. Rev., 95, 566 (1954);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 26a.
    W. M. Fairbank and G. K. Walters, Proc. of Symposium on Solid and Liquid He3 (Ohio State University, Columbus, 1957), p. 205;Google Scholar
  34. 26b.
    W. M. Fairbank and G. K. Walters,Suppl. Nuovo Cimento, 9, 297 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • William E. Keller
    • 1
  1. 1.Los Alamos Scientific LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations