Advertisement

Role of Interfacially Active Metals in the Apparent Adherence of Nickel to Sapphire

  • Willard H. Sutton
  • Earl Feingold
Conference paper
Part of the Materials Science Research book series (MSR)

Abstract

The effects of 1 at. % of interfacially active metals (chromium, titanium, and zirconium) on the wetting and adherence of nickel to sapphire (α-Al2O3) were investigated. Sessile-drop tests were conducted in order to determine the contact angle and the interfacial energy. The apparent adherence of the solidified nickel drops was determined by a simple shear test. The structure of the nickel and the Ni−Al2O3 interface was characterized by optical microscopy, X-ray and electron diffraction, X-ray fluorescence analysis, electron probe X-ray microanalysis, and microhardness measurements. Each active metal had a distinct and reproducible effect on the thickness, the composition, and the microstructure of the interfacial zone, which is discussed in detail. The pure nickel and the chromium-doped specimens exhibited the greatest apparent adherence to the sapphire, whereas the titanium-doped and zirconium-doped specimens chemically degraded (weakened) the surface of the sapphire so that premature failure occurred. A model was developed to explain the effects of the various additives upon bond strength and upon failure modes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. J. Bondley, “Metal Ceramic Brazed Seals,” Electronics 20: 97–99 (1947).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. R. Van Houten, “A Survey of the Bonding of Cermets to Metals,” Welding J. (N.Y.) 37(12): 588–569s (1958).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Symposium on Ceramics and Ceramic—Metal Seals, School of Ceramics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey (April 21, 1953); published in Ceramic Age, Vol. 63 (Feb.-Sept. 1954).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W.H. Kohl, Materials and Techniques for Electron Tubes, Reinhold Publishing Corp., (New York) 1960, pp. 470–518.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.H. Sutton, “Investigation of Oxide-Fiber (Whisker) Reinforced Metals,” General Electric Company, MSD, U. S. Army Contract DA 36-034-ORD-3768Z, Final report AMRA CR 63-01/8, June 1964.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. R. Kurkjian and W. D. Kingery, “Surface Tension at Elevated Temperatures, III, Effect of Cr, In, Sn, and Ti on Liquid Nickel Surface Tension and Interfacial Energy with Al2O3,”, J. Phys. Chem. 60: 961–963 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.M. Armstrong, A.C.D. Chaklader, and J. F. Clarke, “Interface Reactions Between Metals and Ceramics I. Sapphire-Nickel Alloys,”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45: 115–118 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. F. Clarke, “An Investigation of Bond Formation Between Aluminum Single Crystals and Nickel Alloys,” M.S. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Canada, December, 1959.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. P. Abrahamson and N.J. Grant, “β-Chromium,” J. Metals 8; Trans. AIME 975–977 (1956).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.J. Bechtoldt and H. C. Vacher, “Redetermination of the Chromium and Nickel Solvuses in the Chromium-Nickel System,” Trans. AIME 221: 14–18 (1961).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Glasser, “The Thermochemical Properties of the Oxides, Fluorides, and Chlorides to 2500°K,” Argonne National Laboratory, NNL-5740.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.D. Smigelskas and E. O. Kirkendall, “Zinc Diffusion in Alpha Brass,” Trans. AIME 171: 130–134 (1947).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Hansen, “Constitution of Binary Alloys, McGraw-Hill Book Company, (New York), 1958.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. E. Allibone and C. Sykes, “The Alloys of Zirconium,” J. Inst. Metals 39: 179 (1928).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W.B. Pearson, unpublished work (1951); W.B. Pearson and L.T. Thompson, “The Lattice Spacings of Nickel in Solid Solutions,”, Can. J. Phys. 35: 349–357 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. M. Poole, and W. Hume-Rothery, “The Equilibrium Diagram of the System Nickel-Titanium,” J. Inst. Metals 83: 473–480 (1955).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Taylor and R.W. Floyd, “The Constitution of Nickel-Rich Alloys of the Nickel-Chromium-Titanium System,” J. Inst. Metals 80: 577–587 (1952).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Taylor and R.W. Floyd, “The Constitution of Nickel-Rich Alloys of the Nickel-Titanium-Aluminum System,” J. Inst. Metals 81: 25–32 (1952).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. J. Bradley and A. Taylor, “X-Ray Analysis of the Nickel-Aluminum System,” Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A159: 56–72 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. E. McDonald and J.G. Eberhart, “Adhesion in Aluminum Oxide—Metal Systems,” Sandia Corporation Report SC-DC-64-1488, October, 1964.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. V. Tsarevskii and S.I. Popel, “Adhesion of Molten Binary Iron Alloys To Solid Aluminum Oxide,” in: V.N. Eremenko (ed.), The Role of Surface Phenomena in Metallurgy, Academy of Sciences, UKrSSR, Kiev, 1961. [English Translation: Consultant’s Bureau (New York), 1963, pp. 96-101.]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. A. Presnov, “Physicochemical Nature of Bonds Between Dissimilar Materials,” in: V. N. Eremenko (ed.), The Role of Surface Phenomena in Metallurgy, Academy of Sciences, UKrSSR Press, Kiev, 1961. [English translation: Consultant’s Bureau (New York), 1963, pp. 92-95.]Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Nectoux, M. C. Deribere — Desgardes, and N. Drieux, “Adhesion Phenomena,” Contact of Hot Glass With Metal, Symposium Proceedings of the Union Scientifique Continentale Du Verre, Scheveningen, May 25–29, 1964, [English translation: Dr. M. Cable, pp. 19-30.]Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. A. Pask and R. M. Fulrath, “Fundamentals of Glass-to-Metal Bonding, VIII, Nature of Wetting and Adherence,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45 (12): 592–596 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Humenik, Jr., and T. J. Whalen, “Physicochemical Aspects of Cermets,” in: J.R. Tinklepaugh and W. B. Crandall (eds.), Cermets, Reinhold Publishing Corp., (New York), 1960, pp. 6–49.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Benjamin and C. Weaver, “The Adhesion of Evaporated Metal Films on Glass,” Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 261A (1307):516-531 (1961).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. F. Tylecote, “The Adherence of Oxide Films on Metals,” J. Iron Steel Inst, (London) 195: 380–385 (1960).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W.H. Sutton, “Investigation of Bonding in Oxide-Fiber (Whisker) Reinforced Metals,” General Electric Company, U.S. Army Contract No. DA 19-066-AMC-184(X), AMRA CR 65-01/3, March, 1965.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C.J. Smithells, Metals Reference Book, Vol. I, Interscience Publishers, Inc., (New York), 1955, p. 374.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willard H. Sutton
    • 1
  • Earl Feingold
    • 1
  1. 1.Space Science LaboratoryGeneral Electric CompanyKing of PrussiaUSA

Personalised recommendations