Advertisement

Fracture Surface Energy of Soda-Lime Glass

  • S. M. Wiederhorn
Conference paper
Part of the Materials Science Research book series (MSR)

Abstract

The fracture surface energy of soda-lime glass was measured at temperatures of 77, 195, and 300°K in various media using the double-cantilever cleavage technique. Values obtained for the fracture surface energy were 3.20 J/m2 in nitrogen (l), 3.10 J/m2 in toluene (l) — CO2 (s), and 2.83 J/m2 in dry nitrogen (g). During the experiment, slow crack motion was always observed prior to catastrophic failure of the specimens. The crack motion was complex, depending on the stress at the crack tip and the concentration of water in the medium surrounding the crack. Experimental results will be discussed with respect to several different mechanisms of crack growth.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A.A. Griffith, “Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids,” Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) A221:163-198 (1921). See also A.A. Griffith, “Theory of Rupture,” Proc. First Intern. Cong. Appl. Mechanics, Delft, 1924, pp. 55-63.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. C. Fisher and C. G. Dunn, “Surface and Interfacial Tensions of Single-Phase Solids,” in: W. Shockley, J.H. Hollomon, R. Maurer, and F. Seitz (eds.), Symposium on Imperfections in Nearly Perfect Crystals, Pocono Manor, John Wiley and Sons, (New York), 1952.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. J. Gilman, “Direct Measurements of Surface Energies of Crystals,” J. Appl. Phys. 31: 2208–2218 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. See also J. J. Gilman, “Cleavage, Ductility, and Tenacity in Crystals,” in: B. L. Averbach, D. K. Feibeck, G. T. Hahn, and D. A. Thomas (eds.), Proc. Intern. Conf. on Mechanisms Fracture, Swampscott, Massachusetts, John Wiley and Sons, (New York), 1959, pp. 193–224.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    A.R.C. Westwood and T.T. Hitch, “Surface Energy of {100} Potassium Chloride,” J. Appl. Phys. 34: 3085–3089 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    J. P. Berry, “Some Kinetic Considerations of the Griffith Criterion for Fracture, Part I,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 8:194–206 (1960).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    “Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,” 37th edition, Chemical Rubber Publishing Co., 1956, p. 2325.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    W. F. Linke (ed.), “Solubilities of Inorganic and Metal Organic Compounds, Seidel,” 4 edition, Vol. 1, D. Van Nostrand Co., (Princeton), 1958, p. 1135.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    H. Schardin, “Velocity Effects in Fracture,” in: B. L. Averbach, D.K. Feibeck, G.T. Hahn, and D. A. Thomas (eds.), Proc. Intern. Conf. on Mechanisms of Fracture, Swampscott, Massachusetts, John Wiley and Sons, (New York), 1959, pp. 297–330.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    J.B. Murgatroyd, “The Significance of Surface Marks on Fractured Glass,” J. Soc. Glass Technol. 26: 155–171 (1942).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    F. C. Roesler, “Brittle Fractures near Equilibrium,” Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 69B: 981 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    W. C. Levengood and W. H. Johnston, “Kinetics of Slow Fractures in Glass,” J. Chem. Phys. 26: 1184–1185 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    R. J. Charles and W.B. Hillig, “The Kinetics of Glass Failure by Stress Corrosion,” Symposium on the Mechanical Strength of Glass and Ways of Improving It, Union Scientifique Continentale du Verre, 1961.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    C. E. Inglis, “Stresses in a Plate Due to the Presence of Cracks and Sharp Corners,” Trans. Inst. Naval Architects (London) 55: 219 (1913).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    A. Smekal, “The Nature of the Mechanical Strength of Glass,” J. Soc. Glass Technol. 20: 432–448 (1936).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    E.F. Poncelet, “A Theory of Static Fatigue for Brittle Solids,” in: Fracturing of Metals, Am. Soc. Metals, 1948, pp. 201-227.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    E. Saibel, “The Speed of Propagation of Fracture Cracks,” in: Fracturing of Metals, Am. Soc. Metals, 1948, pp. 275-281.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    P. Gibbs and I. B. Cutler, “On the Fracture of Glass Which Is Subjected to Slowly Increasing Stress,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 34: 200–206 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    D. A. Stuart and O. L. Anderson, “Dependence of Ultimate Strength of Glass Under Constant Load on Temperature, Ambient Atmosphere, and Time,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 36: 416–424 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    S.M. Cox, “A Kinetic Approach to the Theory of the Strength of Glass,” J. Soc. Glass Technol. 32: 127–146 (1948).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    W. B. Hillig, “Sources of Weakness and the Ultimate Strength of Brittle Amorphous Solids,” in: J.D. Mackenzie (ed.), Modern Aspects of the Vitreous State, Vol. 2, Butterworth and Co., (London), 1962, pp. 152–194.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    R. J. Charles, “A Review of Glass Strength,” in: J.E. Burke (ed.), Progress in Ceramic Science, Vol. 1, Pergamon Press, (New York), 1961, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    W. P. Berdennikov, “Messung der Oberflächenspannung von Festen Körpern,” Soviet Phys. Z. S. 4:397-419 (1933); Zhur. Fiz. Khim. 5(2–3):358(1934). (A summary of these articles is given in: Surface Energy of Solids by V. D. Kuznetsov, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, 1957, pp. 224-234.)Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    E. B. Shand, “Correlation of Strength of Glas s with Fracture Flaws of Measured Size,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44: 451–455 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 24.
    G. W. Morey, “The Properties of Glass,” 2 edition, Reinhold, (New York), 1954, p. 191.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    H. Freundlich, “Colloid and Capillary Chemistry,” translated from the 3rd German edition by H. S. Hatfield, Dutton (New York), 1922, p. 52.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    D.M. Marsh, “Plastic Flow in Glass,” Proc. Roy. Soc. 279A: 420–435 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 27.
    E. Orowan, “Energy Criteria of Fracture,” Welding J. Res. Suppl. 34;157s–160s (1955).Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    D.M. Marsh, “Plastic Flow and the Mechanical Properties of Glass,” Technical Report No. 161, Tube Investments Research Laboratories, Hinnton Hall, Cambridge, 1963.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    I. Náray-Szabó and J. Ladik, “Strength of Silica Glass,” Nature 188:226–227 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 30.
    I.N. Sneddon, “Crack Problems in the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity,” Nonr 486(06), File No. ERD-126/1, May 15, 1961, pp. 13-44.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    K. Wolf, “Zur Bruchtheorie von A. Griffith,” Z. Math. Angew. Mech. 3: 107–112 (1923).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Wiederhorn
    • 1
  1. 1.National Bureau of StandardsUSA

Personalised recommendations