Understanding Risk

  • Bernard L. Cohen


One of the worst stumbling blocks in gaining widespread public acceptance of nuclear power is that the great majority of people do not understand and quantify the risks we face. Most of us think and act as though life is largely free of risk. We view taking risks as foolhardy, irrational, and assiduously to be avoided. Training children to avoid risk is an all-important duty of parenthood. Risks imposed on us by others are generally considered to be entirely unacceptable.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. L. Cohen and I. S. Lee, “A Catalog of Risks,” Health Physics, 36, 707 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chap. 3, ref. 11.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U. S. National Academy of Sciences Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, “Health Risks of Radon and Other Internally Deposited Alpha Emitters,” (BEIR IV ), Washington, D.C. (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. L. Cohen, “Perspective on Occupational Risks,” Health Physics, 40, 703 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Center for Health Statistics, Monthly Vital Statistics Reports, 36, 5(Supplement)(1987).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. L. Cohen, “Catalog of Risks Extended,” to be published by Task Force on Risk Analysis, American Association of Engineering Societies (1990).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Resources Institute, World Resources 1987 (Basic Books, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. L. Comar and L. A. Sagan, “Health Effects of Energy Production and Conversion,” Annual Review of Energy, 1, 581 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. L. B. Lave and L. C. Freeburg, “Health Effects of Electricity Generation from Coal, Oil, and Nuclear Fuel,” Nuclear Safety, 14(5), 409, (1973)Google Scholar
  10. S. M. Barrager, B. R. Judd, and D. W. North, “The Economic and Social Costs of Coal and Nuclear Electric Generation,” Stanford Research Institute Report (March 1976)Google Scholar
  11. Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group, Nuclear Power—Issues and Choices (Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1977 )Google Scholar
  12. National Academy of Sciences Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems, Energy in Transition, 1985–2010 (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1980)Google Scholar
  13. American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs, “Health Evaluation of Energy Generating Sources,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 240, 2193 (1978)Google Scholar
  14. H. Inhaber, “Risk of Energy Production,” Atomic Energy Control Board Report AECB-1119, Ottawa (1978)Google Scholar
  15. R. L. Gotchy, “Health Effects Attributable to Coal and Nuclear Fuel Cycle Alternatives,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document NUREG-0332 (1977)Google Scholar
  16. D. J. Rose, P. W. Walsh, and L. L. Leskovjan, “Nuclear Power—Compared to What?” American Scientist, 64, 291 (1976)Google Scholar
  17. Union of Concerned Scientists, “The Risks of Nuclear Power Reactors,” H. Kendall (Director), Cambridge, Massachusetts (1977)Google Scholar
  18. Science Advisory Office, State of Maryland, State of Maryland, “Coal and Nuclear Power” (1980)Google Scholar
  19. Norwegian Ministry of Oil and Energy, “Nuclear Power and Safety” (1978)Google Scholar
  20. Ohio River Basin Energy Study (EPA), “Impacts on Human Health from Coal and Nuclear Fuel Cycles” (July 1980 )Google Scholar
  21. United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive, “Comparative Risks of Electricity Production Systems” (1980)Google Scholar
  22. Maryland Power Plant Siting Program, “Power Plant Cumulative Environmental Impact Report,” PPSP-CEIR-1 (1975)Google Scholar
  23. W. Ramsay, Unpaid Costs of Electrical Energy (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1979 )Google Scholar
  24. Legislative Office of Science Advisor, State of Michigan, State of Michigan, “Coal and Nuclear Power” (1980);Google Scholar
  25. B. L. Cohen, American Scientist, 64, 291 (1976)Google Scholar
  26. R. Wilson and W. J. Jones, Energy, Ecology, and the Environment ( Academic Press, New York, 1974 );Google Scholar
  27. H. Fischer et al, “Comparative Effects of Different Energy Technologies,” Brookhaven National Lab Report BNL 51491 (September 1981)Google Scholar
  28. D. K. Myers and H. B. Newcombe, “Health Effects of Energy Development,” Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. Report AECL-6678 (1980); B.Google Scholar
  29. L. Cohen, Before It’s Too Late (Plenum, New York, 1983); American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Cohen, Before It’s Too Late (Plenum, New York, 1983); American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs, “Medical Perspective on Nuclear Power” (1989).Google Scholar
  30. 9.
    B. L. Cohen, Long-Term Consequences of the Linear-No Threshold Dose-Re- sponse Relationship for Chemical Carcinogens, Risk Analysis 1, 267 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 10.
    B. L. Cohen, “Society’s Valuation of Life Saving,” Health Physics, 38, 33(1980). Numerous references to original sources of information are included.Google Scholar
  32. 11.
    B. L. Cohen, “Reducing the Hazards of Nuclear Power: Insanity in Action,” Physics and Society, 16, 3, 29 (1987).Google Scholar
  33. 12.
    B. L. Cohen, “Cost Effectiveness of Reducing Radon Levels in Homes,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 29, 268 (1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bernard L. Cohen 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard L. Cohen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations