More on Radioactive Waste

  • Bernard L. Cohen


While high-level waste has received the lion’s share of the public’s attention, it is not the only waste problem linked with nuclear power. In fact, analyses indicate that it is not even the most important one. Several other nuclear waste issues must be addressed and we will consider them here.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    National Academy of Sciences Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, “Health Risks of Radon” (BEIR-IV), 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. L. Cohen, “Risk Analysis of Buried Wastes from Electricity Generation,” American Journal of Physics, 54, 38 (1986). This is a review article which gives references to the original papers.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, Appendix I; U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guides 1.109–1.113(1976). These specify expenditure of $l,000/man-rem. Dividing this by the risk given in Chapter 5, 260 x 10 6 per man-rem, gives $4 million per cancer death averted.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation, “Sources, Effects, and Risks of Ionizing Radiation,” United Nations, New York (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA), “Alternatives for Long Term Management of Defense High-Level Radioactive Waste,” Document ERDA-77–42/1 (1977).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. R. Brown, “World Food Resources and Population,” Population Reference Bureau (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. L. Cohen, “The Situation at West Valley,” Public Utilities Fortnightly (September 27, 1979 ), p. 26.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Western New York Nuclear Service Center Study, U.S. Department of Energy Report TID-28905–2 (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. M. Jefferson and H. R. Yoshimura, “Crash Testing of Nuclear Fuel Shipping Containers,” Sandia National Lab Report SAND 77–1462 (1978).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Final Environmental Statement on the Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air and other Modes,” Document NUREG-1070 (1977).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. P. Sandoval and G. J. Newton, “A Safety Assessment of Spent Fuel Transportation Through Urban Regions,” Sandia National Laboratory Report SAND 81–2147 (1981)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. P. Sandoval, “Safety Assessment of Spent Fuel Transport in an Extreme Environment,” Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management, 3, 5 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Z. A. Medvedev, New Scientist, 72, 264 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. R. Trabalka, L. D. Eyman, and S. I. Auerbach, “Analysis of the 1957–58 Soviet Nuclear Accident,” Science, 209, 345 (18 July 1980).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. M. Soran, and D. B. Stillman, “An Analysis of the Alleged Kyshtym Disaster,” Los Alamos National Lab Report LA-9217-MS(1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    International Atomic Energy Agency Information Circular, “Report on a Radiological Accident in the Southern Urals on 29 September 1957,” INFCIRC/368 (28 July 1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bernard L. Cohen 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard L. Cohen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations