Advertisement

Hazards of High-Level Radioactive Waste-the Great Myth

  • Bernard L. Cohen

Abstract

An important reason for the public’s concern about nuclear power is an unjustifiable fear of the hazards from radioactive waste. Even people whom I know to be intelligent and knowledgeable about energy issues have told me that their principal reservation about use of nuclear power is the disposal of radioactive waste. Often called an “unsolved problem,” many consider it to be the Achilles’ heel of nuclear power. Several states have laws prohibiting construction of nuclear power plants until the waste disposal issue is settled. Yet ironically, there is general agreement among the scientists involved with waste management that radioactive waste disposal is a rather trivial technical problem. Having studied this problem as one of my principal research specialties over the past 15 years, I am thoroughly convinced that radioactive waste from nuclear power operations represents less of a health hazard than waste from any other large technological industry. Clearly there is a long and complex story to tell.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Wilson, S. D. Colome, J. D. Spengler, and D. G. Wilson, Health Effects of Fossil Fuel Burning (Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. G. Croff and C. W. Alexander, “Decay Characteristics of Once-Through LWR and LMFBR Spent Fuels, High Level Wastes, and Fuel Assembly Structural Materials Wastes,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/ TM-7431 (1980).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reference 1 gives the risk from sulfur dioxide (S02) as 3.5 x 10-5/year for 1 microgram S02 per meter3 of air. An average person inhales 7,000 meters3 of air per year, so this corresponds to inhaling 7,000 micrograms, or 0.007g, of S02. The deaths per gram of S02 are then (3.5 x 10–5/0.007 =) 0.005. An average coal-burning plant produces 3 x 108g of S02 per day; this could then cause (3 x 108 x 0.005 =) 1.5 million deaths if it were all inhaled by people.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See Figure 1 (Chapter 11), which gives the effects from eating all the waste produced in one year. This number must be divided by the number of days per year to obtain the effects from one day.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. L. Cohen, “Ocean Dumping of Radioactive Waste,” Nuclear Technology, 47, 163 (1980). Some of the numbers quoted in that paper have been changed due to later data, but these are incorporated into the results quoted here.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter and Sulfur Oxides,“ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (February 1981); ”Air Quality Criteria for Oxides of Nitrogen,“ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report (June 1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Health Assessment Document for Poly– cyclic Organic Matter, Report EPA–600/9–79–008 (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. L. Cohen, “Risk Analysis of Buried Waste from Electricity Generation,” American Journal of Physics, 54, 38 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    These are reviewed by C. M. Koplik, M. F. Kaplan, and B. Ross, “The Safety of Repositories for Highly Radioactive Waste,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 54, 269 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. L. Cohen, “Probability for Human Intake of an Atom Randomly Released into the Ground, Rivers, Oceans, and Air,” Health Physics, 47, 281 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. L. Cohen, “High Level Waste from Light Water Reactors,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 49, 1 (1977);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. A. Reuppen, M. A. Molecke, and R. S. Glass, “Titanium Utilization in Long Term Nuclear Waste Storage,” Sandia National Lab Report, SAND81–2466 (1981).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. F. Kaplan, “Characterization of Weathered Glass by Analyzing Ancient Artifacts,” in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste, C. J. M. Northrup (ed.) ( Plenum, New York, 1980 ).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. J. Schneider and A.M. Piatt, “High Level Radioactive Waste Management Alternatives,” Battelle Northwest Laboratory Report BNWL-1900 (1974).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. L. Cohen, “Analysis, Critique, and Re-evaluation of High Level Waste Repository Water Intrusion Scenario Studies,” Nuclear Technology, 48, 63 (1980).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. L. Cohen, “Discounting in Assessment of Future Radiation Effects,” Health Physics, 45, 687 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, “What is Tuff?” (1988); “What Happens During Site Characterization?” (1988); “Why Yucca Mountain?” (1988).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Russ, “Notes from Underground,” Nuclear Industry (Spring 1989), p. 13.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. L. Cohen, “A Simple Probabilistic Risk Analysis for High Level Waste Repositories,” Nuclear Technology, 68, 73 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bernard L. Cohen 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard L. Cohen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations