Adiabatic Mode Selection and Accuracy of Quantization of Ballistic Point Contacts

  • Amir Yacobi
  • Yoseph Imry
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 254)


Recent experiments by van Wees et al. [1] and Wharam et al. [2] revealed that the two-terminal conductance of a narrow constriction is quantized in integer multiples of e2/πℏ (including spin degeneracy). The experiments were done on a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in a AlxGa1-xAS/GaAs heterostructures for which the length of the constriction was smaller than the elastic and inelastic mean free paths. The constriction is regarded as a narrow strip, having its own n modes or “conduction channels”, connecting two wide regions that in turn are connected with negligible resistance to electron reservoirs. It has been pointed out [3] that such a quantization follows from the two-terminal Landauer [4–6] formula G = e2/πℏ ij Tij, for full transmission (∑i Tij = 1) in the conducting channels, i.e. for a ballistic constriction. Glazman et al. [7] have recently shown how an adiabatic (i.e. slowly varying) geometry of the constriction can very easily explain the quantization which is exact in the adiabatic limit. However, in most real samples the variations in the geometry of the confining walls are slow in the region where the constriction is narrowest but are abrupt near its termination. Accurate quantization therefore required good impedance matching between the point where adiabaticity is lost and the wide region that is connected to the constriction. Here it is shown, that in order to get a good impedance match one needs the highest transverse mode which arrives at the non-adiabatic opening to be sufficiently low compared with the maximal one supported at the opening. This mode selection can be achieved by an adiabatic constriction and/or by a potential barrier. These insights can be used to predict which conditions the conductance quantization will become accurate.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    B.J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C.W.J. Beenakker, J.G. Williamson, L.P. Kouwen-hoven, D. van der Marel, and CT. Foxton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D.A. Wharam, M. Pepper, H. Ahmed, J.E.F. Frost, D.G. Hasko, D.C. Peacock, D.A. Ritchie, and G.A.C. Jones, J. Phys. C 21, L209 (1988)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Y. Imry, “Physics in mesoscopic systems”, in: Directions in Condensed Matter Physics, G. Grinstein and G. Mazenko, eds., memorial volume in honor of S.K. Ma, 101, World Scientific, Singapore (1986)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Landauer, IBM J. Res. Devel. 1 (1957)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Landauer, Phil. Mag. 21, 863 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, S. Pinhas, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6207 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    L.L Glazman, G.B. Lesovik, D.E. Khmel’nitskii, and R.I. Shekhter, Pisma Zh. Exsp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 218 (1988) [Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 48, 238 (1988)]Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Yacobi and Y. Imry, Phys. Rev. B 41, 5341 (1990); see also M.C. Payne, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 1, 4939 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    L.L Glazman and M. Jonson, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 1, 5547 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Szafer and A.D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 300 (1989);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [10a]
    G. Kirczenow, Sol. St. Commun. 68, 715 (1988);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [10b]
    G. Kirczenow, Phys. Rev. B 39, 10452 (1989);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [10c]
    LB. Levinson, Pisma Zh. Exsp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 273 (1988) [Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 48, 301 (1988)];ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [10d]
    E. Tekman and S. Ciraci, Phys. Rev. B 39, 8772 (1989);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [10e]
    L. Escapa and N. Garcia, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 1, 2125 (1989);ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [10f]
    N. Garcia and L. Escapa, Appl. Phys. Lett., in press; D. van der Marel and E.G. Haanappel, Phys. Rev. B 39, 7811 (1989); Y. Avishai and Y.B. Band, to be publishedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [11]
    M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7906 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [12]
    N. Lang, A. Yacobi, and Y. Imry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1499 (1898);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [12a]
    C.W.J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Phys. Rev. B 39, 10445 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Yacobi
    • 1
  • Yoseph Imry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear PhysicsWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations