Advertisement

Biological vs. Psychological Perspectives on Anxiety Disorders

  • Walton T. Roth
Chapter
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

Maintaining a Cartesian duality between mind and body seems anachronistic in the modern world. No one believes any more that dream travel or apparent possession by an alien personality are valid evidence for the mind’s (or soul’s) independence from the body. Nowadays materialistically based investigations of the brain seek and find mechanisms underlying mental phenomena. Psychoanalysis and clinical cognitive psychology investigate the mental while affirming its bodily origin. Behaviorism does not deny that the subject of its investigation is a manifestation of neural processes, but in the interest of practicality tries to find lawfulness at intermediate levels, eschewing what is too mental just as much as what is too biologic. Only in the realm of religion does the distinction between personal consciousness and body remain popular since the consolation of the promise of immortality in face of corporeal decay and dissolution implies to many believers an eventually complete separation of mind from body.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conniff, R. (1987). The so-so salesman who told millions how to make it big. Smithsonian 18, no. 7 (October), 82–93.Google Scholar
  2. Dakin, E.F. (1929). Mrs. Eddy. Charles Schribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Frank, J.D. (1961). Persuasion and Healing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  4. Klein, D.F. (1980). Anxiety reconceptualized. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 21, 411–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Klerman, G.I., Ballenger, J.C., Burrows, G.D., DuPont, R.L., Noyes, R., Jr., Pecknold, J.C., Rofkin, A., Rubin, R.T., and Swinson, R.P. In reply. [to Marks et al. (1989)]. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 670–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Margraf, J., Ehlers, A., and Roth, W.T. (1986a). Panic attacks: Theoretical models and empirical evidence. In I. Hand and H.-U. Wittchen (Eds.), Panic and Phobias. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Margraf, J., Ehlers, A., and Roth, W.T. (1986b). Biological models of panic disorder and agoraphobia: A review. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 553–567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Margraf, J., Ehlers, A., and Roth, W.T. (1986c) Sodium lactate infusions and panic attacks: A review and critique. Psychosomatic Medicine, 48, 23–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Margraf, J., Ehlers, A., and Roth, W.T. (1988) Mitral valve prolapse and panic disorder: A review of their relationship. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 93–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Stone, A.A. (1984) The new paradox of psychiatric malpractice. New England Journal of Medicine, 311, 1384–1387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zimmer, D.E. (1986). Tiefenschwindel. Die endlose und die beendbare Psychoanalyse. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walton T. Roth
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychiatry (116A3)VA Medical CenterPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations