The Tier Approach to Pesticide Exposure Assessment: Are We There?

  • Patricia B. Curry
  • Seshadri Iyengar
  • Pamela Maloney
Part of the NATO · Challenges of Modern Society book series (NATS, volume 19)

Abstract

The tier approach to pesticide exposure assessment was presented and discussed at the “Workshop on Risk Assessment for Worker Exposure to Agricultural Pesticides” held in The Netherlands in May 1992. At that time there was general agreement on the merits of this approach. Theoretically, it is a logical and reasonable approach that supports the safe use of pesticides while directing attention to those areas of pesticide exposure assessment where it is most needed. This critique of the tier approach Carmichael (1995) will concentrate on the following components: generic data; assumptions on protective clothing and dermal absorption; and the allowable occupational exposure level. Figure 1 (see page 118) outlines the tier approach. The critique will address whether these components are adequately defined to allow the tier approach to be followed at this time. Lastly, personal experience in pesticide regulation will be used to identify potential problems with this approach. The purpose of this paper is to stimulate discussion of these potential problems.

Keywords

Pesticide Exposure Inhalation Exposure Protective Clothing Exposure Estimate Dermal Absorption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carmichael, N.G., 1995, Pesticide exposure: Overview of the tier approach, in: “Proceedings of the Workshop on Methods of Pesticide Exposure Assessment”, October 5–8, 1993, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, W.L., 1992, The harmonization of operator exposure risk assessment, Presented at the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Pests and Diseases-1992.Google Scholar
  3. Henderson, P.Th., Brouwer, D.H., Opdam, J.J.G., Stevenson, H., and Stouten, J.Th.J., 1993, Risk assessment for worker exposure to agricultural pesticides: Review of a workshop, Ann. Occup. Hyg. 37 (5): 499–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Moody, R.P., Nadeau, B., Chu, I., 1994, In vivo and in vitro dermal absorption of benzo[a]pyrene in rat, guinea pig, human and tissue-cultured skin, J. Dermatol. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Nielsen, A., Curry, P., and Leighton, T., 1995, The Pesticide Handlers Exposure Database (PHED): Regulatory review, in: “Proceedings of the Workshop on Methods of Pesticide Exposure Assessment”, October 5–8, 1993, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. Schwope, A.D., Goydan, R., Ehntholt, R., Frank, U., and Nielsen, A., 1992, Permeation resistance of glove materials to agricultural pesticides, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 53: 352–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Scott, R.C., Batten, P.L., Clowes, H.M., Jones, B.K., and Ramsey, J.D., 1992, Further validation of an in vitro method to reduce the need for in vivo studies for measuring the absorption of chemicals through rat skin, Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 19: 484–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Thongsinthusak, T., Brodber, R.K., Ross, J.H., Gibbons, D., and Krieger, R.I., 1990, Reduction of pesticide exposure by using protective clothing and enclosed cabs, Presented at the 199th American Chemical Society National Meeting, Boston, MA, April 22–27, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia B. Curry
    • 1
  • Seshadri Iyengar
    • 2
  • Pamela Maloney
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical Evaluation DivisionHealth CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Zeneca Agro (Formerly with Health Canada)Stoney CreekCanada

Personalised recommendations