Extrapolation of Animal Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) Bioeffects to Humans

  • Michael R. Murphy
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 274)

Abstract

This paper outlines some of the processes and issues involved in extrapolating animal radiofrequency radiation (RFR) bioeffects to humans, particularly with regard to extending the RFR database for the development of new exposure standards. A proposed framework for discussing, evaluating, and planning studies for animal-to-human extrapolation is presented in Figure 1.

Keywords

Human Response Stimulus Parameter Direct Prediction Exposure Standard Aerospace Medicine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D.N. Erwin, Mechanisms of biological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: an overview, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 59:21–31 (1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.H. Dumey, H. Massoudi, and M.F. Iskander. “Radiofrequency Radiation Handbook (4th Edition),” USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, USAFSAM-TR-85-73, Brooks AFB, TX (1986).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.J. Gordon, Scaling of the physiological effects from exposure to radiofrequency radiation: extrapolation from experimental animals to humans, in: “Biological Effects of Electropollution: Brain Tumors and Experimental Models,” S.K. Dutta and R.M. Millis, eds., Information Ventures, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, 131–140 (1986).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.M. Michaelson, Microwave and radiofrequency radiation, in: “Nonionizing Radiation Protection,” M.J. Suess, ed., World Health Organization, Copenhagen, 97–174 (1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.I. Gage, Non-electromagnetic factors influence behavioral effect of microwave exposures, in: “Biological Effects of Electropollution: Brain Tumors and Experimental Models,” S.K. Dutta and R.M. Millis, eds., Information Ventures, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, 117–130 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.E. Paget, Animal selection and extrapolation — the problem defined, in: “Human Risk Assessment — The Role of Animal Selection and Extrapolation,” M.V. Roloff, ed., Taylor & Francis, New York, 1–7 (1987).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.O. de Lorge, Disruption of behavior in mammals of three different sizes exposed to microwaves: extrapolation tolarger mammals, in: “Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Biological Systems,” S.S. Stuchly, ed., International Microwave Power Institute, Edmonton, Alberta Canada, 215–228 (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.R. Adair, On the prediction of human responses to RFR, in: “Proceedings of a Workshop on Radiofrequency Radiation Bioeffects,” J.C. Mitchell, ed., USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, USAFSAM-TP-85-14, Brooks AFB, TX, 227–230 (1985).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.R. Adair, Thermoregulation in the presence of microwave fields, in: “CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields,” C. Plok and E. Postow, eds., CRC Press, Boston, 315–337 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.B. Dews, Extrapolation by proximate interference, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 15:149–151 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Alter, S.L. Hartgraves, and M. Wayner, A review of animal-to-human extrapolation: issues and opportunities. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 15:1–184 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.R. Jauchem and J.H. Merritt, The epidemiology of exposure to electromagnetic fields: an overview of the recent literature, J. Clin Epidemiol 44:895–906 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Murphy
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiofrequency Radiation Division, Occupational and Environmental Health DirectorateU. S. Air Force Armstrong Laboratory AL/OERBrooks Air Force BaseUSA

Personalised recommendations