On Chameleons and Monitors

  • Elaine E. Tarone
Part of the Topics in Language and Linguistics book series (TLLI)

Abstract

One of the most difficult problems faced by researchers in the field of secondlanguage acquisition is the demonstration of the systematic nature of learner language, or interlanguage (Selinker, 1972). What does it mean to say that interlanguage (IL) is systematic when different research instruments, administered at the same time, provide different assessments of the status of the same form in the learner’s IL? One measure may show a form occurring 75% of the time, and another measure may show it occurring only 20% of the time. Research on the nature of system in IL cannot be successful until the causes of systematic variation in IL have been isolated and identified. What causes this variation in IL form?

Keywords

Language Form Language Acquisition Grammatical Form Noun Plural Communicative Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beebe, L. (1977a). The influence of the listener on code-switching. Language Learning 27 (2), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beebe, L. (1977b). Dialect code-switching of bilingual children in their second language. CUNY Forum 3, 141–158.Google Scholar
  3. Beebe, L. (1980). Sociolinguistic variation and style shifting in second language acquisition. Language Learning 30(1), 433–447.Google Scholar
  4. Beebe, L. (1982). The social psychological basis of style shifting. Plenary address, Second Language Research Forum, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  5. Beebe, L., and Giles, H. (1984). Speech accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46, 5–32.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13, 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickerson, L. (1974). Internal and external patterning of phonological variability in the speech of Japanese learners of English: Toward a theory of second language acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  8. Dickerson, L. (1975). The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly 9, 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickerson, W. (1976). Language variation in applied linguistics. ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics 35, 43–66.Google Scholar
  10. Dickerson, W., and Dickerson, L. (1977). Interlanguage phonology: Current research and future directions. In S. P. Corder and E. Roulet (Eds.), The notions of simplification, interlanguages and pidgins (pp. 18–30 ). Neufchatel: Faculté des Lettres.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
  13. Huebner, T. (1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning 35 (2), 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krashen, S. (1976). Formal and informal linguistic environments in language learning and language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 10, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krashen, S. (1977). The monitor model for adult second language performance. In M. Burt, H. Dulay, and M. Finocchiaro (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language (pp. 152–161 ). New York: Regents.Google Scholar
  16. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Labor, W. (1969). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 23, 30–87.Google Scholar
  19. Lantolf, J. and Khanji, R. (1983). Nonlinguistic parameters of interlanguage performance. In J. Morreall (Ed.), The Ninth LACUS forum, 1982 (pp. 457–472 ). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schmidt, R. W. (1977). Sociolinguistic variation and language transfer in phonology. Working Papers in Bilingualism 12, 79–95. Also in G. Ioup, and S. Weinberger (Eds.) (1987), Inter-language phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  21. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL 10 (3), 209–231.Google Scholar
  22. Tarone, E. (1979). Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning 29(1), 181–191.Google Scholar
  23. Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics 4 (2), 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tarone, E. (1985). Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning 35, 373–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tarone, E. (1988) Variation in interlanguage. Edward Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Tarone, E., and Parrish, B. (1988). Task-related variability in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language Learning, 38, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tarone, E., and Yule, G. (1989). Focus on the language learner: Approaches to identifying and meeting the needs of second language learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wolfram, W. (1985). Variability in tense marking: A case for the obvious. Language Learning 35(2), 229–253.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elaine E. Tarone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations