A Proposed Echolocation Receptor for the Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops mincatus): Modelling the Receive Directivity from Tooth and Lower Jaw Geometry

  • A. David Goodson
  • Margaret Klinowska
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 196)

Abstract

Perception and production of underwater sound in Odontocetes is known to extend over a wide band of frequencies but the transmit and receive pathways employed for echolocation appear unconventional. The lower jaw has been demonstrated to be an important component in the echolocation receive mechanism, but the mode of signal coupling to the auditory sense organs is still unclear. The resolving power of sonar signals is severely restricted by physical acoustics and to explain the excellent performance of the dolphin sonar during target tracking and food capture manoeuvres presupposes the presence of an efficient matched receiver fully exploiting the highest frequency components within the pulse transmissions.

The lower jaw is examined as an acoustic construct using the tooth spacing and jaw geometry to compare various detection enhancement hypotheses. Frequency/ sensitivity receive ‘beam patterns’ have been computed to test for similarities with the transmitted signals. Of several hypotheses examined, one simple and apparently efficient model has been isolated which implicates the tooth/mandibular nerve structure as part of a high frequency echo pulse receptor which can accurately match the transmitted signal parameters. The model would also provide an explanation for the evolution of homodonty and polydonty, for the variability of tooth numbers between individuals in a given species, and for the alternate spacing of the teeth in opposite sides of the mandible.

This paper examines the component parts of this hypothetical echo receptor and collates the supporting evidence noted so far. The theory suggests that discriminatory sensing of a target echo range and bearing, particularly during the final hunting phase leading to food capture, exploits a dedicated high frequency receptor operating in parallel with the conventional wide band auditory sense organ.

Keywords

Trigeminal Ganglion Bottlenose Dolphin Beam Pattern Mandibular Nerve Sonar System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. D. Goodson, M. Klinowska and R. Morris, “Interpreting the Acoustic Pulse Emissions of a Wild Bottlenose Dolphin Tursiops truncatus”, Aquatic Mammals, 14(1): 7–12 (1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. W. L. Au, “Echolocation Signals in Open Waters”, 260–269, in: Animal Sonar Systems, R. G. Busnel & J. F. Fish, eds., Plenum Press. New York (1980).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. I. Skolnik, “Antennas”, 252–254, in: Introduction to Radar Systems. 2nd Ed., McGraw Hill, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. S. Norris and G. W. Harvey, “Sound transmission in the porpoise head”, J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 56(2): 659–664 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. G. Mead, “Anatomy of the External Nasal Passages and Facial Complex in Delphinidae (Mammalia: Cetacea)”, Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 207: 1–72 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. H. Ridgway, D. A. Carder, R. F. Green, A. S. Gaunt, S. L. L. Gaunt and W. E. Evans, “Electromyographic and Pressure Events in the Nasolaryngeal System of Dolphins during Sound Production”, 239–249, in: Animal Sonar Systems, R. G. Busnel & J. F. Fish, eds., Plenum Press. New York (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. W. L. Au, R. W. Floyd and J. E. Haun, “Propagation of Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphin Echolocation Signals.”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64(2): 411–421 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. H. Bullock, A. D. Grinnell, E. Ikezono, K. Kameda, Y. Katsuki, M. Nomoto, O. Sato, N. Suga and K. Yanagisawa, “Electrophysiological studies of central auditory mechanisms in cetaceans”, Z. fur vergl. Phys. 59: 117–156 (1968).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. L. Brill, M. L. Sevenich, T. J. Sullivan, J. D. Sustman and R. E. Witt, “Behavioural Evidence for Hearing Through the Lower Jaw by an Echolocating Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)”, Marine Mammal Science, 4(3): 223–230 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. S. Norris, “The Evolution of Acoustic Mechanisms in Cetaceans”, 297–324, in: Evolution and Environment, E. T. Drake, ed. Yale University Press. (1968).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. C. Hansen, “Linear Arrays”, in: The Handbook of Antenna Design, A. W. Rudge, K. Milne, A. D. Olver and P. Knight, eds., Inst. Elec. Eng. P. Perigrinus, London. (1986).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. O. Berktay and J.-A. Shooter, “Nearfield Effects in End-Fire Line Arrays” J.Aconst.Soc.Am. 53(2): 550–556 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. A. Akin, “Geographic Variation in Tooth Morphology and Dentinal Patterns in the Spinner Dolphin Stenella longirostris”, Marine Mammal Science, 4(2): 132–140 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. A. Walker, “Geographic Variations in Morphology and Biology of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops) in the Eastern North Pacific”, South West Fisheries Center Administrative Report, LJ-81–03c.54 (1981).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Bloom, A. D. Goodson, M. Klinowska and S. Rudland. “Tooth and Jaw Geometry in some Odontocetes.”, (In prep.)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. L. Williams, R. Warwick, M. Dyson, L. H. Bannister, eds., in: “Gray’s Anatomy”, Churchill Livingstone, London. (1989).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. J. Anderson, A. G. Hannam and B. Matthews, “Sensory Mechanisms in Mammalian Teeth and Their Supporting Structures”, Physiol. Rev. 50: 171–195 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. N. Denbigh and P. A. Tollman, “Beamforming by Cross-Correlation of Received Spectra”, 439–446 in: Adaptive Methods in Underwater Acoustics. H. G. Urban, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht. (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. M. Gregg and A. D. Dixon, “Somatotopic Organisation of the Trigeminal Ganglion in the Rat”, Archs. oral. Biol. 18: 487–498 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Boyde “Histological Studies of Dental Tissues in Odontocetes.” Rep. Int. Whal.Commn., Special Issue.3, 65–87 (1980).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. H. Ridgway, T. H. Bullock, D. A. Carder, R. L. Seeley, D. Woods and R. Galambos, “Auditory Brainstem Response in Dolphins”, Proc.Nat.Acad.Sci. 78(3): 1943–1947 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. W. B. Moore, “Dolphin Echolocation and Audition”, 161–168, in: Animal Sonar Processes and Performance, P. E. Nachtigall and P. W. B. Moore, eds„ Plenum Press, New York (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. W. L. Au and P. W. B. Moore, “The Perception of Complex Echoes by an Echolocating Dolphin”, 295–299, in: Animal Sonar Processes and Performance, P. E. Nachtigall and P. W. B. Moore, eds., Plenum Press, New York (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. David Goodson
    • 1
  • Margaret Klinowska
    • 2
  1. 1.Sonar and Signal Processing Research Group Electronic & Electrical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Technology, LoughboroughLeicestershireUK
  2. 2.Research Group in Mammalian Ecology and Reproduction Physiological LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations