Social and Communicative Development in Infancy

  • Heather Walker
  • Daniel Messinger
  • Alan Fogel
  • Jeanne Karns
Part of the Perspectives in Developmental Psychology book series (PDPS)

Abstract

The evidence presented in this chapter suggests that infant communicative action is highly context specific, showing remarkable variability to even subtle alterations of the social and physical settings in which interaction occurs. The chapter includes reviews of research on affective communication during face-to-face interactions between infants and their social partners, gestural communication in adult-infant interaction, differences in mother versus father interactive patterns with infants, and finally, research on how infants interact in group settings in the family and with peers. These areas reflect the research interest and expertise of the authors and are not intended to cover the scope of work in infant social and communicative development. Rather, our purpose is primarily conceptual: To show by example that infant social and communicative action is constituted by the dynamic interplay between individuals and the social contexts and physical settings in which that interaction occurs.

Keywords

Communicative Development American Sign Language Dyadic Interaction Infant Behavior Sociocultural Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acredolo, L. P., & Goodwyn, S. W. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development, 59, 450–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. (1990). Sign language in babies: The significance of symbolic gesturing for understanding language development. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 7, pp. 1–42). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  3. Bakeman, R., & Adamson, L. B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development, 55, 1278–1289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakeman, R., & Adamson, L. B. (1986). Infants’ conventionalized acts: Gestures and words with mothers and peers. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, E. (1979). Intentions, conventions, and symbols. In E. Bates, L. Benigini, I. Bretherton, L. Camaioni, & V. Volterra (Eds.), The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy (pp. 33–68). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Belsky, J., Gilstrap, B., & Rovine, M. (1984). The Pennsylvania Infant and Family Development Project, I: Stability and change in mother-infant and father-infant interaction in a family setting at one, three and nine months. Child Development, 55, 692–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. Vol. 3: Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50 (serial 209), 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bril, B., Zack, M., & Nkounkou-Hombessa, E. (1989). Ethnotheories of development and education: A view from different cultures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Burghardt, G. M. (1984). On the origins of play. In P K. Smith (Ed.), Play in animals and humans (pp. 5–42). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Camaioni, L., DeCastro Campos, M. F. P, & DeLemos, C. (1984). On the failure of the interactionist paradigm in language acquisition: A reevaluation. In W. Doise & A. Palmonari (Eds.), Social interaction in individual development (pp. 93–106). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carlile, K. S., & Holstrum, W. J. (1989). Parental involvement behaviors: A comparison of Chamorro and Caucasian parents. Infant Behavior and Development, 12, 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke-Stewart, K. (1978). And daddy makes three: The father’s impact on mother and young child. Child Development, 44, 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohn, J. F., & Elmore, M. (1988). Effect of contingent changes in mothers’ affective expression on the organization of behavior in 3-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohn, J. F., & Ironick, E. Z. (1983). Three-month old infants’ reaction to simulated maternal depression. Child Development, 54, 185–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohn, J., & Tronick, E. Z. (1988). Mother-infant face-to-face interaction: Influence in bidirectional and unrelated to periodic cycles in either partner’s behavior. Development Psychology, 24(3), 386–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crawley, S. B., & Sherrod, K. B. (1984). Parent-infant play during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dickman, Z., & Clark, P. M. (1985). Social interaction between a pair of infant twins. South African Journal of Psychology, 15, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donate-Bartfield, E., & Passman, R. (1985). Attentiveness of mothers and fathers to their baby’s cries. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easterbrooks, M. A., & Goldberg, W. A. (1984). Toddler development in the family: Impact of father involvement and parenting characteristics. Child Development, 55, 740–752.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Field, T. (1979). Differential behavioral and cardiac responses of 3-month-old infants to mirror and peer. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Field, T., Vega-Lahr, N., Goldstein, S., & Scafidi, F. (1987). Interaction behavior of infants and their dual-career parents. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (1990). Constraining nativist inferences about cognitive capacities. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), Constraints on knowledge in cognitive development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Fogel, A. (1979). Peer vs. mother directed behavior in 1-to 3-month old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fogel, A. (1982). Affect dynamics in early infancy: Affective tolerance. In T. Field & A. Fogel (Eds.), Emotion and early interaction (pp. 15–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Fogel, A. (1990a). The process of developmental change in infant communicative action: Using dynamic systems theory to study individual ontogenies. In J. Colombo & J. Fagen (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability and prediction (pp. 341–357). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Fogel, A. (1990b). Sensorimotor factors in communicative development. In H. Bloch & B. Bertenthal (Eds.), Sensorimotor organization and development in infancy and early childhood (pp. 75–88). NATO ASI Series. Amsterdam: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fogel, A., Dedo, J. Y, & McEwen, I. (in press). Effect of postural position on the duration of gaze at mother during face-to-face interaction in 3-to-6-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development.Google Scholar
  30. Fogel, A., Diamond, G. R., Langhorst, B. H., & Demos, V (1982). Affective and cognitive aspects of the two-month old’s participation in face-to-face interaction with its mother. In E. Ironick (Ed.), Social interchange in infancy: Affect, cognition, and communication (pp. 37–57). Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fogel, A., Nwokah, E., Hsu, H., Dedo, J., & Walker, H. (1990). Posture and the development of social action. Paper presented at International Conference on Infant Studies, Montreal.Google Scholar
  32. Fogel, A., Nwokah, E., & Karns, J. (in press). Parent-infant games as dynamic social systems. In K. B. MacDonald (Ed.), Parents and children playing. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  33. Fogel, A., & Thelen, E. (1987). Development of early expressive and communicative action: Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Psychology, 23, 747–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fogel, A., Toda, S., & Kawai, M. (1988). Mother-infant face-to-face interaction in Japan and the United States: A laboratory comparison using 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34, 398–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Franco, F., & Butterworth, G. (1989). Is pointing an intrinsically social gesture? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society-Developmental Psychology Section, Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1990). Beyond the input given: The child’s role in the acquisition of language. Language, 66, 323–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goshen-Gottstein, E. R. (1986). On whose needs does mother focus? Mother-or child-centered care and the self-other differentiation of maternal needs. Psychiatry, 49, 54–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gusella, J. L., Muir, D., & Tronick, E. Z. (1988). The effect of manipulating maternal behavior during an interaction on three-and six-month-olds affect and attention. Child Development, 59, 1111–1124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hay, D. F., & Ross, H. S. (1982). The social nature of early conflict. Child Development, 53, 105–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jennings, K.D., Curry, N. E., & Connors, R. (1986). Toddlers’ social behaviors in dyads and groups. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147, 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karns, J. (1986). Dyadic and group play of toddlers. Poster presented at the Biennial Conference on Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  43. Karns, J., & Fogel, A. (1990). Sequential organization of mother-twin infant interaction. Poster presented at the Seventh International Conference on Infant Studies. Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  44. Kaye K. (1980). Why we don’t talk’ baby talk’ to babies? Journal of Child Language, 7, 489–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaye, K. (1982). The mental and social life of babies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kaye, K., & Fogel, A. (1980). The temporal structure of face-to-face communication between mothers and infants. Developmental Psychology, 16, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kendrick, C., & Dunn, J. (1980). Caring for a second baby: Effects on interaction between mother and firstborn. Developmental Psychology, 16, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kotelchuck, M. (1976). The infant’s relationship to the father: Experimental evidence. In M. E. Lamb, (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 329–344). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Kreppner, K., Paulsen, S., & Schuetze, Y. (1981). Infant and family development: From triads to tetrads. Paper presented to the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  50. Lamb, M. E. (1986). The changing roles of fathers. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The fathers role: Applied perspectives (pp. 3–27). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Lee, L. C. (1973). Social encounters of infants: The social strategies of two individual infants. Dornell Journal of Social Relations, 8, 234–255.Google Scholar
  52. Legerstee, M., Corter, C., & Kienapple, K. (1990). Hand, arm and facial actions of young infants to a social and nonsocial stimulus. Child Development, 61, 774–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Legerstee, M., Pomerleau, A., Malcuit, G., & Feider, H. (1987). The development of infants’ responses to people and a doll: Implications for research in communication. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lempers, J. D. (1979). Young children’s production and comprehension of nonverbal deictic behaviors. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 135, 93–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lewis, M., & Feiring, C. (1981). Direct and indirect interactions in social relationships. In L. Lipsitt (Ed.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 1). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  56. Lewis, M., Feiring, C., & Kotsonis, M. (1984). The social network of the young child: A developmental perspective. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Beyond the dyad. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lock, A. (1980). The guided reinvention of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lock, A., Young, A., Service, V, & Chandler, P. (1990). Some observations on the origins of the pointing gesture. In V. Volterra & C. Erting (Eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  59. Mayes, L. C., & Carter, A. S. (1990). Emerging social regulatory capacities as seen in the still-face situation. Child Development, 61, 754–763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McGuire, J. (1982). Gender-specific differences in early childhood: The impact of the father. In N. Beail & J. McGuire (Eds.), Fathers: Psychological perspectives (pp. 95–125). London: Junction Books.Google Scholar
  61. Messinger, D, & Fogel, A. (1990). The role of referential gazing in object exchange. Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  62. Murphy, S. O. (1988). Newborns and school age siblings. Paper presented to the International Conference on Infant Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  63. Murphy, C. M., & Messer, D. J. (1977). Mothers, infants, and pointing. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction (pp. 325–354). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  64. Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). NATO ASI Series. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ninio, A., & Rinott, N. (1988). Fathers’ involvement in the care of their infants and their attribution of cognitive competence to infants. Child Development, 59, 652–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Orlansky, M. D., & Bonvillian, J. D. (1985). Sign language acquisition: Language development in children of deaf parents and implications for other populations. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 31, 127–143.Google Scholar
  67. Parke, R. D. (1981). Fathers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Power, T. G. (1985). Mother-and father-infant play: A developmental analysis. Child Development, 56, 1514–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Power, T. G., & Parke, R. D. (1982). Play as a context for early learning: Lab and home analyses. In L. M. Laosa & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Families as learning environments for children (pp. 147–178). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reinecke, M. A. (1987). The development of referential communication in infancy: An analysis of “point,” “grasp,” and “show.” Dissertation. Purdue University.Google Scholar
  72. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Ross, H., Tesla, C., Kenyon, B., & Lollis, S. (1989). Maternal intervention in toddler peer conflict and the socialization of principles of justice. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  74. Sagi, A. (1982). Antecedents and consequences of various degrees of paternal involvement in child rearing: The Israeli project. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  75. Schaffer, H. R. (1984). The child’s entry into a social world. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  76. Stern, D. (1977). The first relationship: Infant and mother. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  78. Stoller, S., & Field, T. (1982). Alteration of mother and infant behavior and heart rate during a still-face perturbation of face-to-face interaction. In T. Field & A. Fogel (Eds.), Emotion and early interaction (pp. 57–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  79. Teti, D. M., & Ablard, K. E. (1988). Infant-sibling relationships and child-parent attachment. Paper presented to the International Conference on Infant Studies, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  80. Teti, D. M., Bond, L. A., & Gibbs, E. D. (1988). Mothers, fathers, and siblings: A comparison of play styles and their influence upon infant cognitive level. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 11, 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thelen, E. (1989). The (Re)discovery of motor development: Learning new things from an old field. Developmental Psychology, 25, 946–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tomasello, M., Mannle, S., & Kruger, A. C. (1986). Linguistic environment of 1-to 2-year old twins. Developmental Psychology, 22, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Trevarthen, C. (1986). Development of inter-subjective motor control in infants. In M. G. Wake & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). NATO ASI Series. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  84. Tronick, E. (1977). An ontogenetic structure of face-to-face interaction and its developmental functions. Paper presented to the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  85. Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Yogman, M. W. (1982). Observations on the father-infant relationship. In S. Cath, A. Gurwitt, & J. M. Ross (Eds.), Father and child: Developmental and clinical perspectives (pp. 101–122). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather Walker
    • 1
  • Daniel Messinger
    • 1
  • Alan Fogel
    • 1
  • Jeanne Karns
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Development and the FamilyUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations