Signatures: Machine and Acoustic

  • Harry Hollien
Part of the Applied Psycholinguistics and Communication Disorders book series (APCD)

Abstract

A number of subareas have emerged from the work being carried out in forensic phonetics. Several undoubtedly are as much the responsibility of engineers as they are phoneticians. On the other hand, and as you probably have deduced, most phoneticians have a rather extensive background in acoustics, electronics (at least with relevant equipment) and computers—just as they do with concepts about human behavior, physiology and speech itself. As has been seen, they are involved in such technical issues as the decoding of tape recordings, electronic surveillance, the authentication of tape recordings, speaker identification by machine, and so on. Careers that routinely encompass work such as this naturally involve related activities.

Keywords

Sound Source Tape Recorder Test Firing Electronic Signature Speaker Identification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Appendix to Hearings Before the Select Committee on Assassinations of the House of Representatives, Ninety-Fifth Congress, Government Printing Office, Washington DC, Vol 8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broner, N. (1987) Acoustic Characterestics of the Strait Line Starting Pistol, Unpublished Manuscript, Melborne, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broner, N. (1987) Analysis of Tape Recorder Signatures. Unpublished Report. Melborne, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Committee on Ballistic Acoustics, NRC (1982) Reexamination of Acoustic Evidence in the Kennedy Assassination, Science 218:127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hollien, H., Holbrook, A. and Yamazawa, H. (1989) Electronic Signatures of Tape Recorder Operation, Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koenig, B. E. (1983) Acoustic Gunshot Analysis, The Kennedy Assassination and Beyond (Part I), FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 52:1–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koenig, B. E. (1983) Acoustic Gunshot Analysis, The Kennedy Assassination and Beyond (Conclusion), FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 52:1–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Price, G. R., (1983) Relative Hazards of Weapon Inpulses, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 73:556–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rice, C.G. and Zepler, E. E. (1967) Loudness and Pitch Sensations of an Impulse Sound of Very Short Duration J. Sound Vibration 5:285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schomer, P. D., Goff, R. J. and Little, L. M. (1978) Statistics of Amplitude and Spectrum of Blasts Propagated in the Atmosphere, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 63:1431–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ward, W D., Selters, W and Glorig, A. (1961) Exploratory Studies on Temporary Threshold Shift from Impulses, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 33:781–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Warren, C. H. E (1972) A Significant Single Quantity That Typifies a Sonic Bang, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 51:418–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Hollien
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations