Ultrasonic Characterization of Tensile Overload Effects and Stress Intensity Shielding

  • D. K. Rehbein
  • O. Buck
  • R. B. Thompson

Abstract

The growth of a fatigue crack is modified by the development of contacts between the crack faces1, 2, creating shielding and thus canceling a portion of the applied load. These contacts develop through a number of mechanisms, including plastic deformation, sliding of the faces with respect to each other and the creation and collection of debris such as oxide particles3. Compressive stresses are created on either side of the partially contacting crack faces resulting in opening loads that must be overcome in order to apply a driving force to the crack tip for growth. In this way, the crack tip is shielded from a portion of the applied load, thus creating the need for modification1 of the applied stress intensity range from ΔK = KImax − KImin to ΔK = KImax − KIsh. Determination of the contact size and density in the region of closure from ultrasonic transmission and diffraction experiments4 has allowed estimation of the magnitude of KIsh on a crack grown under constant ΔK conditions. The calculation has since5 been extended to fatigue cracks grown with a tensile overload block. The calculation was also successful in predicting the growth rate of the crack after reinitiation had occurred. This paper reports the results of attempts to define the amount of retardation remaining before reinitiation of crack growth in terms of the parameters used by the distributed spring model. In addition, this paper reports on the acoustic response of a crack grown using a decreasing ΔK and the subsequent implications for determination of the threshold stress intensity factor.

Keywords

Fatigue Crack Crack Opening Displacement Acoustic Response Threshold Stress Intensity Factor Retardation Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Elber, in Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures. ASTM STP 486 (Am. Soc. Test. Mat., Philadelphia, PA), 230 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Q. Bowles and J. Schijve, in Fatigue Mechanisms-Advances in Quantitative Measurement of Physical Damage. ASTM STP 811 (Am. Soc. Test, Mat., Philadelphia, PA), 400 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie, Scripta Met. 17, 595 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Buck, D. K. Rehbein and R. B. Thompson, Eng. Frac. Mech. 28, 413 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. K. Rehbein, L. Van Wyk, R. B. Thompson and O. Buck, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE 8B, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York and London, 1787 (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. A. Auld, Wave Motion 1, 3 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.-M. Baik and R. B. Thompson, J. Nondes. Eval. 4, 177 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. B. Thompson, C. J. Fiedler and O. Buck, in Nondestructive Methods for Materials Property Determination, edited by C. O. Ruud and R. E. Green, Plenum Press, New York and London, 161 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. B. Thompson and C. J. Fiedler, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE 3A. edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York and London, 207 (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Buck, R. B. Thompson and D. K. Rehbein, J. Nondes. Eval. 4, 203 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. K. Rehbein, R. B. Thompson and O. Buck, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE 4A. edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York and London, 61 (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. K. Rehbein, L. Van Wyk, R. B. Thompson and O. Buck, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE 9B, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York and London, 1589 (1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Kendall and D. Tabor, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A232, 231 (1971).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Welsch, D. Eifler, B. Scholtes and B. Maucherach, in Residual Stresses in Science and Technology, DGM Informationsgesellschaft Verlag, Oberursel, 785 (1987).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. Buck, D. K. Rehbein, and R. B. Thompson, in Effects of Load and Thermal Histories on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, edited by P. K. Liaw and T. Nicholas, Met. Soc. of AIME, Warrendale, 49 (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. M. Van Wyk, A Study on Ultrasonic Detection and Characterization of Partially Closed Fatigue Cracks. M. S. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. K. Rehbein
    • 1
  • O. Buck
    • 1
  • R. B. Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Ames Laboratory — USDOE, Materials Science and Engineering DepartmentIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations