Comprehensive Cognitive Disputing in RET

  • Raymond DiGiuseppe
Chapter
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

Disputing irrational beliefs has always been at the heart of RET. However, my 13 years’ experience in teaching therapists to do RET has revealed that disputing is the art of the science and the hardest thing about RET to teach. Most new therapists learn how to identify the activating event, the emotional consequences, and then the irrational belief. Once the client reveals his or her irrational belief, the therapist asks, “Where’s the evidence?” The client looks confused and says, “I guess there is none.” And the therapist assumes that the client has “got it” and responds, “What other problem would you like to discuss?” As therapists develop more experience, they spend more time disputing. They somehow develop a guide to all of the possible disputes that are available to use with a specific type of problem or a specific irrational belief.

Keywords

Cognitive Therapy Emotional Disturbance Irrational Belief Rational Belief Personal Epistemology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bard, J. (1980). Rational-emotive therapy in practice. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, A. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A., & Emory, G. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, A., Rush, A., Shaw, B., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess, P. (1986). Belief systems and emotional disturbance: An evaluation of the rational emotive model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  7. Burgess, P. (1990). Towards resolution of conceptual issues in the assessment of belief systems in rational-emotive therapy: Some preliminary results. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly. Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, I. (1985). The psychology of homosexuality. In A. Ellis & M. Bernard (Eds.), Clinical applications of rational-emotive therapy. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  9. Cormier, W., & Cormier, L. S. (1985). Interviewing skills for helpers: Basic skill and cognitive behavioral interventions. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  10. Demaria, T., Kassinove, H., & Dill, C. (1989). Psychometric properties of the survey of personal beliefs: A rational-emotive measure of irrational thinking. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(2), 329–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DiGiuseppe, R. (1986). The implications of the philosophy of science for rational-emotive theory and therapy. Psychotherapy, 23(4), 634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiGiuseppe, R., & Leaf, R. (in press). Endorsement of irrational beliefs in a general clinical population. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. Google Scholar
  13. DiGiuseppe, R., & Muran, C. (in press). The use of metaphor in rational-emotive therapy. Psychotherapy in Private Practice. Google Scholar
  14. DiGiuseppe, R., Robin, M., Leaf, R., & Gorman, B. (1989, June). A discriminative validation and factor analysis of a measure of irrational/rational thinking. Poster session presented at the World Congress of Cognitive Therapy, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  15. DiGiuseppe, R., Leaf, R., Exner, T., & Robin, M. (1988, Sept.). The development of a measure of irrational and rational thinking. Poster session presented at the World Congress of Behavior Therapy, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
  16. Dryden, W, & DiGiuseppe, R. (1990). A primer on rational-emotive therapy. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, A. (1958). Rational psychotherapy. Journal of General Psychology, 59, 37–49.Google Scholar
  18. Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart.Google Scholar
  19. Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy: The rational-emotive approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Ellis, A. (1977). Fun as psychotherapy. Rational Living, 12(1), 2–6.Google Scholar
  21. Ellis, A. (1985). Overcoming resistance: Rational-emotive therapy with difficult clients. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ellis, A. (1989a). Comments on my critics. In M. Bernard & R. DiGiuseppe (Eds.), Inside rational-emotive therapy: A critical appraisal of the theory and therapy of Albert Ellis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ellis, A. (1989b, June). Is rational-emotive therapy “rationalist” or “constructivist”? Paper presented at the World Congress of Cognitive Therapy, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  24. Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (1987). The practice of rational-emotive therapy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Ellis, A., McInerney, DiGiuseppe, R., & Yeager, R. (1988). Rational-emotive therapy with alcoholics and substance abusers. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ellis, A., Sichel, J., DiMattia, D., Yeager, R., & DiGiuseppe, R. (1989). Rational-emotive couples therapy. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ellis, A., & Whitely, J. (1979). Theoretical and empirical foundations of rational-emotive therapy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  28. Gould, S. J. (1988). Freud’s phylogenetic fantasy. Natural History. Google Scholar
  29. Grieger, R., & Boyd, J. (1980). Rational-emotive therapy: A skills-based approach. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  30. Kassinove, H. (1986). Self-reported affect and core irrational thinking: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Rational-Emotive Therapy, 4(2), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity. San Francisco: International Society for General Semantics.Google Scholar
  32. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and changes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mahoney, M. (1976). The scientist. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  35. Mahoney, M. (1988). The cognitive sciences and psychotherapy: Patterns in a developing relationship. In K. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of the cognitive behavior therapies (pp. 357-386). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Maultsby, M. (1984). Rational behavior therapy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Muran, C., & DiGiuseppe, R. (1990). A cognitive formulation of the use of metaphor in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 10(1), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Polyani, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  39. Prochaska, J., & DiClemente, C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing traditional boundaries of psychotherapy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  40. Walen, S., DiGiuseppe, R., & Wessler, R. (1980). The practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive therapy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wessler, R. A., & Wessler, R. L. (1980). The principles and practice of rational-emotive therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Wein, K., Nelson, R., & Odom, J. (1975). The relative contribution of reattribution and verbal extinction to the effectiveness of cognitive restructuring. Behavior Therapy, 6, 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woolfolk, R., & Sass, T. (1989). Rational-emotive philosophy. In M. Bernard & R. DiGiuseppe (Eds.), Inside rational-emotive therapy: A critical appraisal of the theory and therapy of Albert Ellis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond DiGiuseppe
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySt. John’s UniversityJamaicaUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Rational-Emotive TherapyNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations