The Analysis of Sequence in Social Interaction

  • Thomas N. Bradbury
  • Frank D. Fincham
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

Although all behaviors occur over time, it is relatively uncommon for the temporal order or sequence of behaviors to be a matter of great interest in psychological research. Thus sequence, an intrinsic feature of all behavioral phenomena, has been largely ignored in attempts to explore and understand these phenomena. It is particularly noteworthy that this oversight occurs in research on social interaction, where investigators often claim to study reciprocity, patterns, processes, systems, and cycles. Rather than examine the sequential dependencies among behaviors that are strongly implied by these terms, simple rates of behavior are often studied instead. This practice is deficient because it fails to capture the dynamic qualities of social interaction and also promotes inferential error: A behavior that emerges from the combined actions of two individuals is often viewed as being solely determined by the one individual exhibiting the behavior. More generally, “efforts to analyze given actions while ignoring their interactive context seem misdirected, error prone, and noise generating” (Duncan, Kanki, Mokros, & Fiske, 1984, p. 1346).

Keywords

Marital Satisfaction Likelihood Ratio Statistic Attributional Style Unconditional Probability Target Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison, P. D., & Liker, J. K. (1982). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, T. W., & Goodman, L. A. (1957). Statistical inference about Markov chains. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, M. B. (1976). Screening effects in multidimensional contingency tables. Applied Statistics, 25, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1979). The analysis of behavior sequences. In R. B. Cairns (Ed.), The analysis of social interactions: Methods, issues, and illustrations (pp. 81–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Catalano, R. A., Dooley, D., & Jackson, R. (1983). Selecting a time-series strategy. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 506–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatfield, C. (1980). The analysis of time series: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Duncan, S., Jr., Kanki, B. G., Mokros, H., & Fiske, D. W. (1984). Pseudounilaterality, simple-rate variables, and other ills to which interaction research is heir. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1335–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fincham, F. D., & O’Leary, K. D. (1983). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in maritally distressed and nondistressed couples. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 1, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. & Nelson, G. (1987). Attributional processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 3. Causal and responsibility attributions for spouse behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1991). Cognition in marriage: A program of research on attributions. In D. Perlman & W. Jones (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 2, pp. 159–203). London: Kingsley Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series analysis: A comprehensive introduction for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  14. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1985). A valid procedure for obtaining self-report of affect in marital interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 151–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottman, J. M., Markman, H., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1985). Causal attributions of married couples: When do they search for causes? What do they conclude when they do? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1398–1412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 220–266). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  21. Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 587–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1985). Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 85–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Margolin, G., & Wampold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 554–567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCain, L. J., & McCleary, R. (1979). The statistical analysis of the simple interrupted time-series quasi-experiment. In T. D. Cook & D. T. Campbell (Eds.), Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings (pp. 233–293). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  25. McCleary, R., & Hay, R. A. (1980). Applied time series analysis for the social sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Notarius, C. I. (1981). Assessing sequential dependency in cognitive performance data. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 343–357). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Phelps, R. E., & Slater, M. A. (1985). Sequential interactions that discriminate high- and low-problem single mother-son dyads. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 684–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Revenstorf, D., Vogel, B., Wegener, C., Hahlweg, K., & Schindler, L. (1980). Escalation phenomena in interaction sequences: An empirical comparison of distressed and nondistressed couples. Behavior Analysis and Modification, 4, 97–115.Google Scholar
  29. Sackett, G. P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 623–649). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Schaap, C. (1982). Communication and adjustment in marriage. The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
  31. Ting-Toomey, S. (1983). An analysis of verbal communication patterns in high and low marital adjustment groups. Human Communication Research, 9, 306–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wampold, B. E., & Margolin, G. (1982). Nonparametric strategies to test the independence of behavioral states in sequential data. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 755–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appendix I: Further Reading in Log-Linear Analysis and Related Topics

  1. Baker, F. B. (1981). Log-linear, logit-linear models: A didactic. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 75–102. [IL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [AL]Google Scholar
  3. Bonett, D. G., & Bentler, P. M. (1983). Goodness-of-fit procedures for the evaluation and selection of log-linear models. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 149–166. [ST]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brier, S. S. (1982). Analysis of categorical data. In G. Keren (Ed.), Statistical and methodological issues in psychology and social sciences research (pp. 347–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [AL]Google Scholar
  5. Budescu, D. V. (1984). Tests of lagged dominance in sequential dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 402–414. [ST]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feick, L. F., & Novak, J. A. (1985). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: Log-linear models exploiting the order in variables. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 600–611. [ST]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [AL]Google Scholar
  8. Gilbert, G. N. (1981). Modelling society: An introduction to loglinear analysis for social researchers. London: George Allen & Unwin. [IL]Google Scholar
  9. Goodman, L. A. (1978). Analyzing qualitative/categorical data. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books. [AL]Google Scholar
  10. Gottman, J. M. (1987). The sequential analysis of family interaction. In T. Jacob (Ed.), Family interaction and psychopathology: Theories, methods, and findings (pp. 453–478). New York: Plenum Press. [IL]Google Scholar
  11. Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. (1990). Temporal form: Detecting sequences in social interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press. [AL]Google Scholar
  12. Green, J. A. (1988). Loglinear analysis of cross-classified ordinal data: Applications in developmental research. Child Development, 59, 1–25. [IL]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data, Vol. 1: Introductory topics. New York: Academic Press. [AL]Google Scholar
  14. Haberman, S. J. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data, Vol. 2: New developments. New York: Academic Press. [AL]Google Scholar
  15. Hawes, L. C., & Foley, J. M. (1976). Group decisioning: Testing a finite stochastic model. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 237–254). Beverly Hüls: Sage. [EA]Google Scholar
  16. Lacobucci, D., & Wasserman, S. (1988). A general framework for the statistical analysis of sequential dyadic interaction data. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 379–390. [AL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy, J. J. (1983). Analyzing qualitative data: Introductory log-linear analysis for behavioral research. New York: Praeger. [IL]Google Scholar
  18. Knoke, D., & Burke, P. J. (1980). Log-linear models. Beverly Hills: Sage. [AL]Google Scholar
  19. Marascuilo, L. A., & Busk, P. L. (1987). Loglinear models: A way to study main effects and interactions for multidimensional contingency tables with categorical data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 443–455. [IL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Notarius, C. T., Benson, P. R., Sloane, D., Vanzetti, N. A., & Hornyak, L. M. (1989). Exploring the interface between perception and behavior: An analysis of marital interaction in distressed and nondistressed couples. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 39–64. [EA]Google Scholar
  21. Shaffer, J. P. (1973). Defining and testing hypotheses in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 127–141. [AL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sillars, A. L., Pike, G. R., Jones, T. S., & Murphy, M. A. (1984). Communication and understanding in marriage. Human Communication Research, 10, 317–350. [EA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Upton, G. J. G. (1978). The analysis of cross-tabulated data. New York: Wiley. [AL]Google Scholar

Appendix II: Further Reading On Lag Sequential Analysis and Related Topics

  1. Bakeman, R. (1978). Untangling streams of behavior: Sequential analyses of observational data. In G. P. Sackett (Ed.), Observing behavior, Vol. 2: Data collection and analysis methods (pp. 63–78). Baltimore: University Park Press. [IL]Google Scholar
  2. Bakeman, R. (1983). Computing lag sequential statistics: The ELAG program. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 15, 530–535. [ST]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakeman, R., & Adamson, L. B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development, 55, 1278–1289. [EA]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakeman, R., & Dabbs, J. M. Jr. (1976). Social interaction observed: Some approaches to the analysis of behavior streams. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 335–345. [IL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1990). Applying observational methods: A systematic view. In J. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed.; pp. 181–223). New York: Wiley. [IL]Google Scholar
  6. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. [IL]Google Scholar
  7. Biglan, A., Hops, H., Sherman, L., Friedman, L. S., Arthur, J., & Osteen, V. (1985). Problem-solving interactions of depressed women and their husbands. Behavior Therapy, 16, 431–451. [EA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cousins, P. C., & Power, T. G. (1986). Quantifying family process: Issues in the analysis of interaction sequences. Family Process, 25, 89–105. [IL]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gottman, J. M. (1980). Consistency of nonverbal affect and affect reciprocity in marital interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 711–717. [EA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gottman, J. M. (1983). How children become friends. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48(3, Serial No. 201). [EA]Google Scholar
  11. Gottman, J. M., & Bakeman, R. (1979). The sequential analysis of observational data. In M. E. Lamb, S. J. Suomi, & G. R. Stephenson (Eds.), Social interaction analysis: Methodological issues (pp. 185–206). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. [AL]Google Scholar
  12. Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. (1978). Sequential analysis of observational data using Markov chains. In T. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change (pp. 237–285). New York: Academic Press. [AL]Google Scholar
  13. Hahlweg, K., Goldstein, M. J., Nuechterlein, K. H., Magana, A. B., Mintz, J., Doane, J. A., Miklowitz, D. J., & Snyder, K. S. (1989). Expressed emotion and patient-relative interaction in families of recent onset schizophrenics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 11–18. [EA]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kienapple, K. (1987). The microanalytic data analysis package. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 19, 335–337. [ST]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lichtenberg, J. W., & Heck, E. J. (1986). Analysis of sequence and pattern in process research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 170–181. [IL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lytton, H., & Zwirner, W. (1975). Compliance and its controlling stimuli observed in a natural setting. Developmental Psychology, 11, 769–779. [EA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacTurk, R. H., McCarthy, M. E., Vietze, P. M., & Yarrow, L. J. (1987). Sequential analysis of mastery behavior in 6- and 12-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 199–203. [EA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maxim, P. E., Bowden, D. M., & Sackett, G. P. (1976). Ultradian rhythms of solitary and social behavior in rhesus monkeys. Physiology and Behavior, 17, 337–344. [EA]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Notarius, C. I., Krokoff, L. J., & Markman, H. J. (1981). Analysis of observational data. In E. E. Filsinger & R. A. Lewis (Eds.), Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches (pp. 197–216). Beverly Hills: Sage. [IL]Google Scholar
  20. Sackett, G. P. (1978). Measurement in observational research. In G. P. Sackett (Ed.), Observing behavior, Vol. 2: Data collection and analysis methods (pp. 25–43). Baltimore: University Park Press. [IL]Google Scholar
  21. Sackett, G. P. (1980). Lag sequential analysis as a data reduction technique in social interaction research. In D. B. Sawin, R. C. Hawkins, L. O. Walker, & J. H. Penticuff (Eds.), Exceptional infant, Vol. 4: Psychosocial risks in infant-environment transactions (pp. 300–340). New York: Brunner/Mazel. [IL]Google Scholar
  22. Sackett, G. P., Holm, R., Crowley, C., & Henkins, A. (1979). A FORTRAN program for lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction data. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 11, 366–378. [ST]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1989). Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [AL]Google Scholar
  24. Wampold, B. E. (1984). Tests of dominance in sequential categorical data. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 424–429. [ST]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wampold, B. E. (1986). State of the art in sequential analysis: Comment on Lichtenberg and Heck. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 182–185. [IL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williamson, R. N., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1985). Two approaches to marital interaction: Relational control patterns in marital types. Communication Monographs, 52, 236–252. [EA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas N. Bradbury
    • 1
  • Frank D. Fincham
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations