Mushrooms and Mercuries

Cases of Noncompliance
  • Joseph F. DiMento
Part of the Environment, Development, and Public Policy book series (EDPE)

Abstract

James and Guido Frezzo are mushroom farmers in Avondale, Pennsylvania. They inherited this business from their father, who began it in the 1930s after he decided to give up quarrying in western Pennsylvania. Since then all family members have been mushroom farmers or have been married to mushroom farmers.

Keywords

United States Supreme Carbon Monoxide Concentration County Health Department Legislative History Technical Violation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1311(c), (1970 ed. Supp. IV).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Interview with James Frezzo, Dec. 28, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Interview with Bruce Chasan, Jan. 8, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    United States v. Frezzo Brothers, 602 F.2d 1123, 1127 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Interview with James Frezzo, Dec. 28, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    United States v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc., 461 F. Supp. 266 (1978) at 270.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    461 F. Supp. 266 (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Interview with James Frezzo, Dec. 28, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Interview with Bruce Chasan, Jan. 8, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Interview with Bruce Chasan, Jan. 8, 1985.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    United States v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc., 461 F. Supp. 266 (1978), n. 4.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Letter from Bruce J. Chasan to Joseph F. DiMento, July 9, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    461 F. Supp. 269 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Interview with James Frezzo, Dec. 28, 1981.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Interview with Bruce Chasan, Jan. 8, 1985.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Interview with Bruce Chasan, Jan. 8, 1985. The plea bargain would have involved a fine only.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    United States v. Frezzo Brothers, No. 82–1494, 703 F. 2d 62 (3rd Cir. Mar. 29, 1983), 13 ELR 20584; and No. 82–2136, 13 ELR 10382 (Oct. 4, 1983).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    United States v. Distler, 671 F.2d 954 (1981), at 756.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Specifically, two violations of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Interview with Donald E. Distler, Apr. 22, 1985.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quoted in The Louisville Courier Journal, Dec. 27, 1978, at E7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    United States v. Distler, 671 F.2d 954 (1981), at 963.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    United States v. Distler, 671 F.2d 954 (1981).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quoted in The Louisville Courier Journal, Sept. 15, 1979, at 7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Louisville Times, Mar. 6, 1979, at E4.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Letter of Donald E. Distler to Joseph F. DiMento, Sept. 22, 1982, and interviews with Donald E. Distler, Apr. 19 and Apr. 22, 1985.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Letter of Donald E. Distler to Joseph F. DiMento, Sept. 22, 1982.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Interview with Donald E. Distler, Apr. 22, 1985.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
    Interview with Fred Latham, Assistant City Manager, Santa Fe Springs, Apr. 21, 1982.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
    Written testimony by J. Lash. Hearings before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, 98th Cong., First Sess., Feb. 15, 1983, 46–50 at 265. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1983. As a result of information gathered in this affair and of inspections of two other sites which Stankovich occupied, a criminal action was brought against Stankovich. He was charged with violations of California hazardous waste statutes, and was convicted and sentenced to serve three years in prison. Telephone conversation with Fred Latham, Assistant City Manager, Santa Fe Springs, Sept. 17, 1985.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Interview with Angus MacBeth, Feb. 2, 1985.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chrysler had equipped some cars with air pumps in 1973 for comparison purposes. Brief for Respondents, Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, at 23, n.31 (hereinafter cited as Respondents’ Brief).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, 1652 (fn. omitted).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    In the Matter of Chrysler Corporation, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Before the Administrator, pp. 99–100.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    This was the figure, before maintenance, reached in the Olson Program. Other figures ranged from 25% to 100% of vehicles that were out of compliance.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Respondents’ Brief, at 59.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    42 U.S.C. § 202(a)(1), (d)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 7541(a)(1), (d)(1).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Respondent’s Brief, at 35.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 631 F. 2d 865, 893.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, 1657 (quoting JA 111:912–913).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, 1651.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    The New York Times, Dec. 11, 1976, at A-1.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    The Wall Street Journal, Dec. 13, 1976, A-4, col. 2.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, at 1651, n.21 (Freer statement).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, at 1651, n.21 (Heinen statement).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, at 1651, n.21 (Brubacher testimony).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chrysler interview, Aug. 27, 1981.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
  58. 58.
    Respondents’ Brief at 3–5.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    In the Matter of Chrysler Corporation, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Before the Administrator, at 14.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Id., at 12.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, 1665.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Respondents’ Brief, at 71.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Chrysler interview, Aug. 27, 1981.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    42 U.S.C. §§7541(c)(l), 207(c)(1).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chrysler interview, Aug. 27, 1981.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Specifically, EPA, citing a 1968 HEW report, legislative history of the Clean Air Act and reports of the Council on Environmental Quality, noted that carbon monoxide impairs the oxygen carrying ability of the blood; that it can affect visual acuity, motor ability and mental performance in levels found in cities and that its effects can be severe. Respondents’ Brief, at 3–5.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, at 1652, n.31 (quoting JA V:2001). Memorandum from A. T. Weibel to W. S. Fagley.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, at 1652 (quoting Brief of Petitioner at 65).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, at 1654, n.56.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 14 ERC 1647, 1659, n.84.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    The case was finally concluded with the United States Supreme Court denying a writ of certiorari, 49 LW 3410 (Dec. 2, 1980).Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Chrysler interview, Aug. 27, 1981.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Comment, “Chrysler Corporation v. EPA, 631 F.2d 865 D.C. Cir. 1980,” 11 Environmental Law 784 (1981).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chrysler interview, Aug. 27, 1981.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Interview with Angus MacBeth, Feb. 2, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph F. DiMento
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations