Interpretative Model for Linguistic Quantifiers

  • Irena Bellert

Abstract

This paper attempts to give a model-theoretical account for the semantics of elementary English sentences (the basic units of the semantic structure of the entire language), as a necessary first step towards a compositional interpretive semantics of all the sentences of the language (see Bellert, 1983, for some applications of this proposal to complex sentences).

Keywords

Reference Class Universal Quantifier Feature Method Existential Quantifier Singular Proposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, K., 1982, Quantification and Pragmatics, Linguistics and Philosophy, 4:607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barwise, J. and Cooper, R., 1981, Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language, Linguistics and Philosophy, 4:159–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellert, I., 1983, Interpretive Model for Quantification Structure: I. Elementary Structures, II. Further Applications, typescript (80 pages).Google Scholar
  4. Bellert, I., 1984, Interpretive Rules for Pronouns (in preparation).Google Scholar
  5. van Benthem, J., 1983, A Linguistic Turn: New Directions in Logic, paper presented at the 7th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Salzburg, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N., 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, MIT press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. Copi, I. M., 1967, “Symbolic Logic,” MacMillan, London and New York.Google Scholar
  8. Donnellan, K. S., 1978, Speaker Reference, Descriptions and Anaphora, in: “Syntax and Semantics,” P. Cole, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Dummett, M., 1973, “Frege, Philosophy of Language,” Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  10. Fodor, J. D., 1982, The Mental Representation of Quantifiers, in: “Processes, Beliefs, and Questions,” S. Peters and E. Saarinen, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. Geach, P. T., 1976, Back Reference, in: “Language and Focus,” A. Kasher, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Kempson, R. M. and Cormack, A., 1981, Ambiguity and Quantification, Linguistics and Philosophy, 4:259–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leibniz, G. W., 1966, Logical Papers, G. H. R. Parkinson, ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. May, R., 1977, “The Grammar of Quantification,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. (Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1980).Google Scholar
  15. Quine, W. V. O., 1970, “Philosophy of Logic,” Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  16. Sommers, F., 1982, “The Logic of Natural Language,” Clarendon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Vetulani, Z., 1983, Proof of some Theorems in Bellert’s Interpretive Model for Quantificational Structure, (typescript in Polish), Institute of Mathematics, UAM, Poznan, Poland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irena Bellert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations