Ability Grouping and Student Learning

  • Maureen T. Hallinan

Abstract

Grouping students by ability for instruction is a common pedagogical practice. In elementary schools it appears most frequently in the form of within-class ability grouping, that is, the assignment of students in a class to instructional groups based on their ability or achievement. In secondary schools it generally occurs in the form of tracking, or the assignment of students to different classes at the same grade level on the basis of their ability.

Keywords

Student Learn Student Achievement High Group Student Motivation Ability Grouping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, Carole and Russell Ames. 1984. “Systems of student and teacher motivation: toward a qualitative definition” Journal of Educational Psychology 76(4) 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, Linda, Carolyn Evertson, and Jere Brophy. 1979. “An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups.” Elementary School Journal 79: 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, Albert. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, Rebecca and Robert Dreeben. 1983. How Schools Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beckerman, Terrill and Thomas Good. 1981. “The classroom ratio of high-and-low aptitude students and its effect on achievement.” American Educational Research Journal 18: 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom, Benjamin S. 1976. Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Brophy, Jere and Thomas L. Good. 1974. Teacher-Student Relationships: Causes and Consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll. 1963. “A model of school learning.” Teachers College Record 64(8): 723–733.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, James. 1961. The Adolescent Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, Harris and David Tom. 1984. “Teacher expectation research: a review with implications for classroom instruction.” Elementary School Journal 85(1): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cusick, Philip. 1973. Inside High School. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  12. Dunkin, Michael and Bruce Biddle. 1974. The Study of Teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  13. Eder, Donna. 1981. “Ability grouping as a self-fulfilling prophecy: a microanalysis of teacher-student interaction.” Sociology of Education 54 (July): 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evertson, Carolyn. 1982. “Differences in instructional activities in average-and low-achieving junior high English and math classes.” Elementary School Journal 82:329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, Charles, Nikola Filby, Richard Marliave, Leonard Cahen, Marilyn Dishaw, Jeffrey Moore, and David Berliner. 1978. Teaching Behaviors, Academic Learning Time and Student Achievement. Final Report of Phase III-B, Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study. Technical Report V-l. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
  16. Flanders, Ned. 1965. Teacher Influence, Pupil Avtitudes and Achievement. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Cooperative Research Monograph No. 12.Google Scholar
  17. Gage, Nathaniel. 1972. Teacher Effectiveness and Teacher Education. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific.Google Scholar
  18. Gamoran, Adam. 1984. “Instructional, institutional and social effects of ability grouping.” Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  19. Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  20. Good, Thomas and Susan Marshall. 1984. “Do students learn more in heterogeneous or homogeneous groups?” Pp. 15–51 in Penelope Peterson, Louise Cherry Wilkinson, and Maureen T. Hallinan (eds.), The Social Context of Instruction. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hallinan, Maureen T. and Aage B. Sørensen. 1985. Class size, ability group size and student achievement. American Journal of Education 94, 1:71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hallinan, Maureen T. and Aage B. Sørensen. 1983. “The formation and stability of ability groups.” American Sociological Review 48(6): 838–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hallinan, Maureen T. and Ray Teixeira. 1987. “Students’ interracial friendships: individual characteristics, structural effects and racial differences. American Journal of Education 95 (4).Google Scholar
  24. Hilgard, Ernest and Gordon Bower. 1966. Theories of Learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  25. Karweit, Nancy. 1976. “Quality of schooling: a major educational factor?” Educational Researcher 5(2): 15–17.Google Scholar
  26. Kelley, Harold H. 1947. “Two functions of reference groups.” Pp. 410–414 in Swanson, Newcomb, and Hartley (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  27. Kemper, Theodore. 1968. “Reference groups, socialization and achievement.” American Sociological Review 33: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewin, Kurt, Ronald Lippitt, and Ralph White. 1939. “Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates.” Journal of Social Psychology 1: 271–279.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, John and Carolyn Evertson. 1980. Teachers’ Interactions with Reading Groups of Differing Ability Levels. Technical Report No. R4093. Austin: University of Texas, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  30. Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, Neal and John Dollard. 1941. Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Newcomb, Theodore. 1961. The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenthal, Robert and Lenore Jacobson. 1968. Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils’ Intellectual Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  34. Slavin, Robert E. 1977. “Classroom reward structure: an analytical and practical review.” Review of Educational Research 47(4): 633–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sørensen, Aage B. and Maureen T. Hallinan. 1977. “A reconceptualization of school effects.” Sociology of Education 50(4): 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sørensen, Aage B. and Maureen T. Hallinan. 1984. “Race effects on assignment to ability groups.” Pp. 85–103 in Peterson, Wilkinson, and Maureen T. Hallinan (eds.), The Social Context of Instruction. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Spady, William G. 1973. “The impact of school resources on students.” Pp. 135–177 in Kerlinger (ed.), Review of Research in Education. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.Google Scholar
  38. Stern, Paula and Richard Shavelson. 1981. “The relationship between teachers’ grouping decisions and instructional beahviors: an ethnographic study of reading instruction.” Paper presented at the meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  39. Stodolsky, Susan. 1984. “Frameworks for studying instructional processes in peer work-groups.” Pp. 107–124 in Penelope Peterson, Louise Cherry Wilkinson, and Maureen T. Hallinan (eds.), The Social Context of Instruction. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tannenbaum, Frank. 1938. Crime and Community. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
  41. Wiley, David. 1976. “Another hour, another day: quantity of schooling, a potent path for policy.” Pp. 225–265 in Sewell, Robert M. Hauser, and David L. Featherman (eds.), Schooling and Achievement in American Society. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wiley, David and Annegret Harnischfeger. 1974. “Explosion of a myth: quantity of schooling and exposure to instruction, major educational vehicles.” Educational Researcher 3(4): 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maureen T. Hallinan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations