Stuttering as an Expression of Inefficient Language Development

  • Jon Eisenson
Chapter
Part of the Cognition and Language: A Series in Psycholinguistics book series (CALS)

Abstract

In the beginning there was the Word, and shortly after this beginning came the stuttered word. If we seek an answer as to the genesis of stuttering, we are probably only a little better informed today than we were in the biblical days. Then, for reasons known only to God, Moses spoke in a manner that may be described as dysfluent and very likely as stuttering.

Keywords

Sentence Type Complex Sentence Semantic Constraint Late Acquisition Linguistic Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    The interested reader might wish to compare West’s “Ten-Factor Yardstick” with recently established “facts” about stuttering (see Andrews, Craig, Feyer, Hoddinotts, Howie, and Neilson, 1983; Wingate, 1983).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Single-base transformations involve simple sentences (e.g., “we will not go”) whereas double-base transformations involve complex sentences (e.g., “we heard him call”). Muma’s analysis of transformational grammar is based on the model of 1965 and earlier (e.g., Chomsky, 1965).Google Scholar

References

  1. Andrews, G., & Harris, M. The syndrome of stuttering. London, Heinemann, 1964.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, A. Craig, A., Feyer, A. M., Hoddinott, S., Howie, P., & Neilson, M. Stuttering: A review of research findings and theories, circa 1982. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1983, 48 (3), 226–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beech, H. R., & Fransella, F. Research and experiments in stuttering. New York: Pergamon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, M., & Eisenson, J., Speech disorders. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1956.Google Scholar
  5. Bloodstein, O. Stuttering as tension and fragmentation. In J. Eisenson, (Ed.), Stuttering: A second symposium. New York: Harper and Row, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Bluemel, C. The riddle of stuttering. Danville, Ill.: Interstate Publishing, 1957.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenson, J. Stuttering as perseverative behavior. In J. Eisenson (Ed.), Stuttering: A second symposium. New York: Harper and Row, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenson, J., Stemach, G., & Lindenstein, M. Unpublished, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. Emrick, C. Language performance of stuttering and nonstuttering children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1972, 32(9-B), 5509–5510.Google Scholar
  11. Haynes, W., & Hood, S. Language and dysfluency variables in normal speaking children from discrete chronological age groups. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 1977, 2, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howie, P. M. Concordance for stuttering in monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1981, 24, 317–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingram, D., & Eisenson, J. Therapeutic approaches. III: Establishing and developing language in congenitally aphasic children. In J. Eisenson (Ed.), Aphasia in children. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. Jonas, G. Stuttering: The disorder of many theories. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, L. Developmental sentence analysis. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  16. Morehead, D., & Ingram, D. The development of base syntax in normal and linguistically deviant children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1973, 16, 330–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Muma, J. Syntax of preschool fluent and dysfluent speech: A transformational analysis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971, 14, 428–441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Perkins, W. Speech pathology (2nd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby, 1977.Google Scholar
  19. Pratt, J. Comparisons of linguistic perception and production in preschool stutterers and nonstutterers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973, 34(2-B), 913.Google Scholar
  20. Records, M. A., Kidd, K. K., & Kidd, J. K. Stuttering among relatives of stutterers. Address to the annual meeting of the American Speech and Hearing Association, Houston, Texas, November 1976.Google Scholar
  21. Silverman, E., & Williams, D. A. A comparison of stuttering and nonstuttering children in terms of five measures of oral language development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 1967, 1, 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tyack, D., & Gottsleben, R. Language sampling, analysis, and training. Palo Alto, Cal.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  23. Van Riper, C. The natures of stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. West, R. An agnostic’s speculations about stuttering. In J. Eisenson (Ed.), Stuttering: A symposium. New York: Harper & Row, 1958.Google Scholar
  25. Wingate, M. E. Speaking unasserted: Comments on a paper by Andrews et al. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1983, 48(3), 255–163.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Eisenson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hearing and Speech ScienceStanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations