Measurement of Neurobehavioral Responses to Renal Failure, Dialysis, and Transplantation

  • Paul E. Teschan

Abstract

The psychological factors to be considered in this chapter are likely to have two general orientations: (1) inward, toward self, and (2) outward, toward interactions with persons and things in the world—with components of thought and fantasy embracing both. There would be enough psychological factors for us to consider even if our patients were “simply” confronted with the coping stresses of a catastrophic illness. But in this presentation, your attention is invited to the fact that in patients with renal failure the problem is more complicated: the brain, the instrument of coping, of thought, fantasy, and interaction, is itself poisoned. And the treatment which relieves the poisoning itself creates both internal and external coping stresses at both physical and psychological levels.

Keywords

Renal Failure Choice Reaction Time Nervous System Function Continuous Performance Test Verbal Descriptor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schreiner, G. E. Mental and personality changes in the uremic syndrome. Medical Annals of the District of Columbia, 1959, 28, 316–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Teschan, P. E. On the pathogenesis of uremia. American Journal of Medicine, 1970, 48, 671–677.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teschan, P. E., and Ginn, H. E. In S. G. Massey and A. L. Seller (Eds.), Clinical aspects of uremia and dialysis. Springfield, 111.: Charles C Thomas, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourne, J. R., Ward, J. W., Teschan, P. E., Musso, M. F., Johnston, J. B. Jr., and Ginn, H. E. Quantitative assessment of the electroencephalogram in renal disease. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1975, 39, 377–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamel, B., Bourne, J. R., Ward, J. W., and Teschan, P. E. Visually evoked cortical potentials in renal failure: transient potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1978, 44, 606–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamel, B., Bourne, J. R., Ward, J. W. and Teschan, P. E. Transient and steady-state visually evoked cortical potentials in renal disease. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1976, 40, 316.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ginn, H. E. Neurobehavioral and clinical responses to hemodialysis. Proceedings, 10th and 11th Contractors Conferences, AKP, NIAMDD, DHEW Pub. No. 77-1442, Jan. 17–19, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., Sarason, I., Branscome, E. B. Jr., and Veck, L. H. A continuous performance test of brain damage. Journal of Consult Psychology, 1956, 20, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul E. Teschan
    • 1
  1. 1.Vanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations