Denial and Objectivity in Hemodialysis Patients

Adjustment by Opposite Mechanisms
  • Bruce H. Beard
  • Tom F. Sampson

Abstract

Patients with end-stage renal disease are treated with hemodialysis to extend their lives and maintain their physical status so they may function as effective and productive family and community members. Patients generally attempt to adjust to their illness and treatment as though they were in an improving state and often as though they were hardly ill at all. One of the mechanisms of defense they use is denial which makes it appear as though they see themselves as being only marginally ill and marginally handicapped while also appearing to negate the fact they have a serious and usually irreversible disease. The use of denial has been widely documented1–5 and has been accepted as an almost universal defense in dialysis patients. This study revealed evidence which indicated that patients in addition to denial make equal use of the adaptive process of objectivity facing reality in an undistorted manner. By believing and yet denying they have a serious illness, dialysis patients use two diametrically opposite adjustment mechanisms. Furthermore, this study revealed one other significant phenomenon, specifically, that patients shift back and forth from denial to objectivity in a rapid and never-ending fashion. It is believed that this balanced shifting between these two divergent strategies is essential for harnessing the adaptive strengths of both defenses for use in surviving the prolonged ordeal of life on dialysis.

Keywords

Dialysis Patient Hemodialysis Patient Productive Family Chronic Hemodialysis Untimely Death 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams, H. S. Psychiatric reflections on adaptation to repetitive dialysis. Kidney International, 1974, 6, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glassman, B. M., and Siegel, A. Personality correlates of survival in a long-term hemodialysis program. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1970, 22, 566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beard, B. H. Fear of death and fear of life. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1969, 21, 373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Short, M. J., and Wilson, W. P. Roles of denial in chronic hemodialysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1969, 20, 433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De-Nour, A. Kaplan, Shaltiel, J., and Czaczkes, J. W. Emotional reactions of patients on chronic hemodialysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1968, 30, 521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fishman, D. B., and Schneider, C. J. Predicting emotional adjustment in home dialysis patients and their relatives. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1972, 25, 99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McKegney, F. P., and Lange, P. The decision to no longer live on chronic hemodialysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1971, 128, 267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lefebvre, P., Norbert, A., and Crombez, J. C. Psychological and psychopathological reactions in relation to chronic hemodialysis. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 1972, 17, 9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce H. Beard
    • 1
  • Tom F. Sampson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Texas Southwestern Medical SchoolDallasUSA
  2. 2.Southwestern Dialysis CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations