Pollution pp 168-181 | Cite as

The Neo-Technological Landscape Degradation and Its Ecological Restoration

  • Zev Naveh
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 2)

Abstract

As stated by Dr. Kyle R. Barbehenn, a pest situation is one that degrades the quality of the human environment. Such pest situations are created in the industrial society through neotechnological denudation and destruction of the natural landscape with rapidly increasing speed and extent. As these pest situations do not have immediate discernible effects on human health and, as most of their damages cannot be evaluated in market priced cost/ benefit analyses, they are largely ignored by those who create them.

Keywords

Natural Landscape Outdoor Recreation Limestone Quarry Virgin Land Future Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Odum E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd Ed., Saunders Co., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashby W.R. 1956. An introduction to cybernetics, Chapman and Hall, London.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cantlon J.E. 1969. The stability of natural populations and their sensitivity to technology, Brookhaven Symp. in Biology 22, Diversity and stability in ecological systems: 197–205.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McHarg J.L. 1971. Design with nature, Doubleday and Co., New York (paperback), p. 53.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Odum H.T. 1971. Environment, power and society, Wiley and Son, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas W.L. Edit., 1956. Man’s role in changing the face of the earth, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darling F.F. and Milton J.P. Edit., 1966. Future environments of North America, The Natural History Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dorst J. 1965. Avant que la nature meurt, Delachaux et Niestle, Neuchatel.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Detwyler T.R. Edit., 1971. Man’s impact on environment, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nicholson M. 1970. The environmental revolution, Hodder and Stroughton, London.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fosberg F.R. 1966. Restoration of lost and degraded habitats, In: Future environments of North American: 503–515.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Riney T. 1963. A rapid field technique and its application in describing conservation status and trends in semi-pastoral areas, African Soils VIII /2.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McHarg J.L. 1966. Ecological determinism, In: Future environments of North America: 526–538.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Naveh Z. and Dan J. 1971. The human degradation of mediterranean landscapes in Israel, Intern. Symp. on Mediterranean Ecosystems, Valdivia, Chile 1971 (in press).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scheidt E. 1971. Environmental effects of highways, In: Man’s impact on the environment: 419–427.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leopold L.B. 1971. The hydrological effect of urban land use, In: Man’s impact on the environment: 205–216.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.S. Dept. of Interior. 1967. Surface mining and our environment, A special report to the nation.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buchwald K. 1970. Die Industriegesellschaft und die Landschaft, Naturschutz und Landschaft, 8: 23–41.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Albrecht W.A. 1956. Physical, chemical and biochemical changes in the soil community, In: Man’s role in changing the face of the earth: 648–676.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Commoner B. 1968. Threats to the integrity of the nitrogen cycle: Nitrogen compounds in soil, water, atmosphere and precipitation, In: S.F. Singer, Ed., Global effects of environmental pollution, Symp. Dallas, Texas, 1968: 70–94.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Philips J. 1961. Agriculture and Ecology, London.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naveh Z. 1970. Ecology and development. 2nd World Congress of Engineers and Architects: Dialogue in Development. Tel Aviv, 1970.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hursch C.R. 1948. Local climates in the Copper Basin of Tennessee as modified by the removal of vegetation, U.S.D.A. Cir. 774.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Treshow M. 1970. Environment and plant response. McGraw Hill Co., New York.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hepting G.H. 1964. Damage to forests from air pollution. J. of Forestry, 62: 630–634.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    First European Congress on the influence of air pollution on Plants and animals. 1969. Proceedings, Wageningen, 1969.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berge H. 1970. Immisionsschaeden. In:die nichtparasitaeren Krankheiten, Edit. B. Rademacher, Paul Parey, Berlin.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scurfield G. 1960. Air pollution and tree growth, Forestry Abst. 21: 1–20.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tinker J. 1971. One flower in ten faces extinction. New Scientist and Science Journal, 50:1408–414.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schultz A.M. 1967. The ecosystem as a conceptual tool in the management of natural resources. In: Natural Resources - Quality and Quantity, Ed. Ciriacy-Wantrup:139–161.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mumford L. 1966. Closing statement in: The future environments of North America,:727.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ardley R. 1970. The social contract,: Collins, London.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boulding K.E. 1966. The economics of the coming spaceship earth, in: Environmental quality in a growing economy, Ed. H. Jarett, John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Egler F. 1971. The way of science, a philosophy of ecology for the layman, Hafner Publ., New York.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Christian C.S. 1958. The concept of land units and land systems, Proc. 9th Pacific Sci. Congr., Bankok, 1957, 20: 74–80.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Benthem R.J. 1966. Erholung im laendlichen Raum, Der Landschaftsaufbau in den Niederlanden, Garten und Landschaft, 8: 124–135.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Westhoff V. 1971. The dynamic structure of plant communities in relation to the objectives of conservation, Proc. llth symposium Brit. Ecol. Soc, July 1970:3–14, Blackwell Scientific Publisher, Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stamp D. 1969. Nature conservation in Britain, Collins, London.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Knabe W. 1965. Observations on worldwide efforts to reclaim industrial waste land. In 5th Symp. Brit. Ecol. Soc., 1964: 263–296, Blackwell Scientific Publ. Oxford.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Krysmanski R. 1970. Die Nuetzlichkeit der Landschaft, Bertelsmann Universitaetsverlag, Duesseldorf.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Egler F. 1968. Vegetation management (right of way) McGraw Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, 14:287–288a, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Naveh Z. 1969. Adaptation of drought resistant plants to vegetation engineering in Israel. 2nd Symp. on sedimentation problems,:166–177, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tzuriel A.D. 1969. Sand dune stabilization research in Israel, Symp. on vegetation engineering, Tel Aviv, 1968 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Naveh Z. and Elan S. 1970. Biological protection of waterways and drainage canals in mediterranean and semi-arid conditions, in: Hydrology of Drainage Canals, A. Kinori: 180–207, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kalvariski J. 1969. Preparation of slopes for planting and seeding, Symp. on vegetation engineering, Tel Aviv, 1968: 22–23 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Morin J. 1969. Mechanized biological stabilization of slopes, Symp. on vegetation engineering, Tel Aviv, 1968: 19–21 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Naveh Z. 1970. A dynamic ecosystem approach to vegetation engineering in Israel, Proc. XVII, Intern. Hort. Congr. Tel Aviv, 1970: 94.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Naveh Z., Morin J. and Danziger J. 1972. Progress report on the “Nesher” limestone quarry reclamation project, Technion, Haifa (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zev Naveh
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, TechnionIsrael Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations